Etiket: Turkish citizenship family members

  • Turkish Citizenship by Investment 2026 | Requirements & Risks

    Turkish Citizenship by Investment 2026 | Requirements & Risks

    DOLĞUN AKADEMİ | TURKISH CITIZENSHIP LAW | 2026

    Turkish Citizenship by Investment in 2026: Requirements, Legal Safeguards, Property Investments and Citizenship Revocation Risks

    Author: Attorney Murat Can Dolğun – Istanbul Bar Association

    Publication: TD Law Firm & Legal Consultancy – Dolğun Akademi

    Original Publication: October 22, 2026

    Legal Fields: Turkish Citizenship Law, Immigration Law, Administrative Law, Real Estate Law, Banking and Financial Regulations, Foreign Investment Law and Private International Law.

    Abstract

    Turkish citizenship through investment remains legally available in 2026. Nevertheless, criminal investigations and administrative reviews conducted during 2025 and 2026 concerning previously approved citizenship applications have raised important legal questions for prospective foreign investors.

    Can a foreign investor still acquire Turkish citizenship by purchasing real estate worth USD 400,000? Is depositing USD 500,000 in a Turkish bank sufficient? Does an investment certificate of conformity guarantee naturalisation? What happens if a property appraisal report is subsequently found to be inaccurate?

    Answering these questions requires examination of Turkish Citizenship Law No. 5901, the Regulation on the Implementation of the Turkish Citizenship Law, Land Registry Law No. 2644 and the applicable regulations and administrative instructions issued by the General Directorate of Land Registry and Cadastre.

    Citizenship by investment is not a system in which every person who makes a qualifying financial investment automatically becomes a Turkish citizen.

    The investment must satisfy the applicable statutory conditions, the competent institution must determine compliance, the application must be examined and the authorised state authority must issue a positive naturalisation decision.

    This article examines the investment alternatives available in 2026, the USD 400,000 property requirement, USD 500,000 alternative investment routes, the Property Investment Amount Determination Certificate (TTB), foreign-exchange purchase certificates, due diligence, three-year holding requirements, family members’ eligibility and the possibility of subsequent citizenship cancellation or withdrawal.

    The central argument is that legal protection should begin before the investment is made rather than only after a dispute arises.

    Independent legal verification, transparent payment arrangements, proper valuation procedures and enforceable contractual safeguards may substantially reduce the risk of future disputes.

    This research reflects the legislation and official information available as of October 22, 2026.

    I. Does Turkish Citizenship by Investment Still Exist in 2026?

    Yes. Acquisition of Turkish citizenship through qualifying investment remains legally possible in 2026.

    Article 12 of Turkish Citizenship Law No. 5901 and Article 20 of the Regulation on the Implementation of the Turkish Citizenship Law provide the legal framework for exceptional naturalisation based on specified investment criteria.

    The continued availability of the programme is also reflected in current information published by the Directorate General of Population and Citizenship Affairs, the General Directorate of Land Registry and Cadastre and Invest in Türkiye.

    However, administrative and criminal investigations into historical investment transactions have created some misunderstanding concerning whether the programme has been abolished.

    Two different matters must be distinguished: the continuing legal availability of citizenship through investment and retrospective investigations involving particular individuals who obtained Turkish citizenship in previous years.

    The administrative re-examination of historical appraisal reports, investigations concerning allegedly sham transactions or decisions withdrawing citizenship from particular individuals do not, by themselves, repeal the statutory mechanism for investment-based naturalisation.

    Conversely, the programme’s continued availability does not guarantee approval of every qualifying investment or citizenship application.

    Prospective investors should therefore assess the legal eligibility of the relevant property or other investment, the authenticity of payment records, applicable security requirements and the risk of subsequently discovered deficiencies.

    The correct starting point is not merely whether an investment exceeds a financial threshold, but whether the complete transaction meets the legal requirements for exceptional naturalisation.

    Official source: Invest in Türkiye – Acquiring Property and Citizenship.

    II. What Is the Legal Basis of Turkish Citizenship by Investment?

    Citizenship through investment is not an independent nationality category. It constitutes one method of exceptional acquisition of Turkish citizenship under Article 12 of Law No. 5901.

    The relevant provisions permit certain foreign nationals who satisfy statutory conditions to acquire Turkish citizenship by decision of the President, provided that there is no relevant obstacle concerning national security or public order.

    The investment requirements are principally detailed in Article 20 of the implementing Regulation.

    It is essential to understand that property developers, banks, financial intermediaries, investment consultants and private legal service providers cannot themselves grant Turkish citizenship.

    A developer may sell real estate. A bank may accept a deposit. An investment institution may execute a qualifying financial transaction. An attorney may provide legal advice and representation.

    However, the final nationality decision belongs to the competent Turkish state authority.

    Consequently, commercial expressions such as “guaranteed citizenship”, “automatic Turkish passport” or “certain approval” cannot lawfully replace the statutory citizenship decision.

    The certificate confirming that an investment satisfies the applicable financial requirements and the final naturalisation decision are separate administrative stages.

    Even where a certificate of conformity is issued, the nationality application remains subject to the relevant legal examination.

    III. How Much Must a Foreign Investor Invest to Qualify for Turkish Citizenship in 2026?

    Turkish law provides several routes to exceptional naturalisation through investment.

    Investment Category Minimum Requirement Principal Condition
    Real estate acquisition USD 400,000 Three-year non-sale undertaking
    Fixed capital investment USD 500,000 Determination by competent ministry
    Bank deposit USD 500,000 Three-year maintenance
    Government debt instruments USD 500,000 Three-year holding period
    Real estate or venture capital investment funds USD 500,000 Three-year holding period
    Private pension system USD 500,000 Three years in the designated system
    Employment creation 50 employees Official determination of employment

    Different investment categories are subject to different regulatory authorities and compliance procedures.

    For example, the Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency is relevant to the qualifying bank deposit route. The Capital Markets Board supervises the investment-fund route, while the Ministry of Industry and Technology is responsible for determining compliance with the fixed-capital investment requirement.

    For real estate investments, the applicable procedures of the General Directorate of Land Registry and Cadastre are particularly important.

    The financial figures above represent minimum qualifying investments. They do not necessarily include taxes, government charges, notarial fees, translation costs, technical assessments or professional service fees.

    Foreign-exchange conversion requirements and documentation rules also differ according to the investment mechanism.

    Therefore, compliance with the payment procedure applicable to one investment type should not automatically be assumed to establish compliance with another.

    Official source: Directorate General of Population and Citizenship Affairs – Citizenship Services FAQ.

    IV. Is Purchasing Real Estate Worth USD 400,000 Sufficient for Turkish Citizenship?

    In 2026, qualifying real estate with an accepted value of at least USD 400,000 may support an exceptional naturalisation application, subject to the statutory requirements.

    However, merely stating a price of USD 400,000 in a sale agreement does not establish compliance.

    The property must be legally eligible for acquisition by the foreign investor and suitable for the citizenship investment procedure.

    Payment documentation, valuation procedures, the official purchase instrument and the applicable land registry restrictions must also comply with the relevant rules.

    4.1. The Sale Price and Officially Recognised Investment Amount

    Consider an apartment marketed at USD 450,000.

    If the contractual price is USD 450,000 but the officially accepted investment amount reflected in the Property Investment Amount Determination Certificate is USD 360,000, the contractual price alone should not be treated as satisfying the USD 400,000 requirement.

    Likewise, a valuation establishing a figure above USD 400,000 may not suffice if the officially recognised payment documents show a lower amount.

    Under the applicable procedure, the officially declared sales price and documented payment amounts must independently satisfy the relevant threshold and be supported by the TTB.

    4.2. Legal Suitability Before Payment

    A foreign investor should therefore examine the property’s legal status and the relevant valuation process before transferring substantial funds.

    Failure to do so may create both citizenship eligibility risks and potential financial disputes with the seller.

    A transaction that is genuine in economic terms may still fail to satisfy a mandatory citizenship requirement.

    V. Which Types of Real Estate Cannot Be Used for Citizenship by Investment?

    Foreign ownership of real estate and eligibility of a particular property for investment-based citizenship are separate legal issues.

    Following the regulatory amendments effective from December 12, 2023, agricultural properties and undeveloped land without the required buildings cannot be used as qualifying property investments under the relevant citizenship mechanism.

    Current provisions emphasise independent units with condominium ownership or condominium easement rights, or other property meeting the specified building-related requirements.

    5.1. Agricultural Property and Undeveloped Land

    Purchasing a valuable undeveloped plot does not automatically create eligibility for Turkish citizenship.

    The land registry classification and the actual legal characteristics of the property are decisive.

    5.2. Restrictions Based on Previous Ownership

    Additional restrictions may arise from the property’s ownership history, the characteristics of the seller and whether the property has previously been involved in investment-based citizenship procedures.

    5.3. Foreign Ownership Restrictions

    Article 35 of Land Registry Law No. 2644 and other relevant provisions govern foreign real estate ownership and applicable limitations.

    The ability to acquire a particular property may depend on the investor’s nationality, property location and other legal restrictions.

    It would therefore be incorrect to assume that all foreign nationals may purchase every category of property anywhere in Türkiye.

    Official source: Your Key Türkiye – Citizenship Acquisition Through Real Estate.

    VI. Why Should Investors Investigate the Property’s Ownership History and the Seller?

    A proper legal examination should extend beyond obtaining the property’s current title deed.

    The history of previous transfers and the identity of former owners may be important in determining whether the property qualifies for citizenship purposes.

    Restrictions may arise where property was previously used for an exceptional citizenship investment or transferred through a transaction chain involving individuals who acquired nationality through that procedure.

    Accordingly, the fact that the current seller is a Turkish national or a Turkish company does not necessarily prove that the property is eligible.

    6.1. The Chain of Ownership

    Investors should examine relevant previous transfers, including their dates and relationships between the parties, in accordance with the applicable administrative guidance.

    Particular attention should be paid to restrictions affecting properties involved in previous citizenship transactions and changes of ownership within relevant periods.

    6.2. Encumbrances and Legal Claims

    The land registry should be examined for mortgages, attachments, injunctions, preliminary sale agreements, usufruct rights, litigation annotations and other encumbrances.

    These matters may affect the investor’s ownership rights, ability to transfer the property and economic interests.

    6.3. Corporate Sellers

    Where the seller is a company, its commercial registry records, powers of representation and authority to dispose of the property should be verified.

    The legal status of the company and the relevant transaction should be evaluated independently from marketing materials supplied by brokers or sales representatives.

    The purpose of due diligence is not only to support a future citizenship application but also to protect the investor’s property and financial rights.

    VII. How Are Property Valuation Reports and the TTB Certificate Issued in 2026?

    One of the most important issues in current property-based citizenship applications is the Property Investment Amount Determination Certificate, known in Turkish as the Taşınmaz Edinim Sureti ile Vatandaşlık Kazanımına Esas Tutar Tespit Belgesi (TTB).

    Under the relevant circulars and procedures of the General Directorate of Land Registry and Cadastre, the TTB establishes the amount that may be accepted for citizenship purposes in relation to the particular real estate transaction.

    7.1. The Electronic Valuation System

    Valuation requests for citizenship-related transactions are made through the WebTapu and TADEBİS systems.

    The TTB is prepared as part of the relevant electronic process and transmitted to the land registry system.

    A sales brochure, privately prepared price estimate or unsigned PDF supplied by the seller cannot substitute for a properly issued TTB.

    7.2. September 2026 Changes to Valuation Rules

    The amendments to Circular No. 2024/4 adopted in September 2026 are particularly important.

    Under the updated official guidance, the valuation report supporting a TTB may be prepared by a valuation company authorised by the Capital Markets Board and satisfying the applicable system requirements.

    Accordingly, valuation for citizenship purposes is not necessarily restricted to a single designated appraisal company.

    7.3. Twelve-Month Validity

    Under the official guidance applicable in October 2026, the period between issuance of the TTB and the application for the relevant citizenship-related land registry transaction must not exceed twelve months.

    Where that period has expired, the underlying valuation report may need to be renewed.

    Separate considerations may apply to a transaction already completed while the certificate was valid.

    7.4. Special Circumstances Involving Real Estate Investment Trusts

    September 2026 amendments also address specific valuation arrangements for transactions involving real estate investment trusts and relevant appraisal reports published on the Public Disclosure Platform.

    Such exceptions require examination of the applicable special procedure rather than reliance on a general sales representation.

    Official source: Your Key Türkiye – TTB and Valuation Procedures.

    The central concern for an investor is to establish the officially acceptable investment amount before committing substantial funds.

    Investments very close to the statutory threshold may be particularly vulnerable to differences between the purchase price, payment evidence and officially accepted valuation.

    VIII. Why Are Genuine Bank Transfers and Foreign-Exchange Purchase Certificates Important?

    Payment procedures must comply with the requirements applicable to real estate investments intended for Turkish citizenship.

    Where required, the relevant foreign-currency amount must be sold to a bank operating in Türkiye for onward sale to the Central Bank of the Republic of Türkiye, and the transaction must be documented through the appropriate foreign-exchange purchase certificate, commonly called the DAB.

    The relationship between the investor, originating bank account, foreign-exchange transaction, seller and land registry transaction should be clear.

    8.1. Documentary Consistency

    Payment receipts, SWIFT records, bank account statements, foreign-exchange certificates, the sales contract and land registry records should be consistent.

    An unidentified or inadequately explained payment may create legal difficulties even where substantial funds were transferred.

    8.2. Genuine Payment Versus Circular Transfers

    Suppose an investor transfers USD 400,000 to a seller but subsequently receives a concealed repayment of part of the purchase price.

    The apparent payment may then become the subject of examination concerning whether the investment was genuinely completed.

    By contrast, an investor who genuinely paid the contractual price and received no refund may occupy a materially different legal position.

    8.3. Payment Through Third Parties

    Payments from corporate accounts, payments made by third parties and transactions involving more than one currency require individual legal analysis.

    The use of an intermediary should not be assumed to satisfy every statutory requirement without examination of the applicable banking rules.

    8.4. Warning Signs

    Investors should exercise caution where intermediaries propose undocumented cash arrangements, fictitious payment receipts or financial records that do not correspond to actual bank transactions.

    A foreign-exchange purchase certificate is important evidence, but it does not automatically establish the property’s true historical value or disprove all allegations of a sham transaction.

    IX. Can a Foreign Investor Acquire Turkish Citizenship by Purchasing Multiple Properties?

    Yes. Under the applicable rules, it may be possible to satisfy the required property investment amount through more than one eligible property.

    There is no general requirement that the entire investment amount must be represented by a single apartment.

    For example, an investor may purchase two eligible independent units with qualifying values of USD 220,000 and USD 210,000.

    However, the combined contractual amounts are not sufficient by themselves.

    Each property must satisfy the applicable eligibility rules, and its relevant price, official valuation, banking records and holding restrictions must be properly documented.

    9.1. Properties Acquired on Different Dates

    Where properties were acquired at different times, the applicable rules governing each transaction and the conditions for combining those investments must be evaluated.

    9.2. Shared Ownership

    Shared ownership must be distinguished from the full ownership of several separate units.

    According to the General Directorate of Land Registry and Cadastre’s guidance, properties acquired in shared ownership after February 1, 2023, cannot be used for exceptional citizenship applications through the relevant real estate investment route.

    Thus, purchasing a fractional interest in an apartment does not necessarily create eligibility even where that interest has a substantial economic value.

    Official source: Your Key Türkiye – Frequently Asked Questions.

    X. Can a Notarised Preliminary Real Estate Sale Agreement Qualify for Citizenship?

    Turkish citizenship legislation permits certain qualifying real estate sale-promise arrangements, subject to specific requirements.

    However, an ordinary reservation agreement, informal preliminary protocol or simple written promise is not equivalent to a sale-promise contract satisfying the citizenship rules.

    The required formalities, legal status of the property, documented payment and relevant land registry annotation must be examined.

    10.1. Properties Under Construction

    For properties under construction, the legal position of the independent unit is particularly important.

    Condominium easement rights, building permits, approved plans and the seller’s legal authority should be examined before payment.

    10.2. Payment and Registration Requirements

    A qualifying preliminary sale arrangement may require full payment of the applicable amount and registration of the prescribed undertaking concerning transfer or cancellation of the annotated right for the statutory period.

    Those requirements must be distinguished from the payment terms of an ordinary private commercial agreement.

    10.3. Risk of Uncompleted Developments

    Where an independent unit is not properly identified in the land registry or the project does not satisfy the relevant requirements, making substantial advance payments may expose the investor to financial and legal risks.

    For such projects, payment conditions, construction completion obligations, cancellation provisions and citizenship-related documentation should be addressed before signing.

    XI. What Is the Legal Meaning of the Three-Year Non-Sale Undertaking?

    Property-based citizenship investments require the investment to be maintained for the statutory period.

    For qualifying completed property purchases, the land registry records must contain the required three-year non-sale undertaking.

    The relevant dates must be determined from the actual transaction and the applicable rules.

    An investor cannot assume that obtaining citizenship immediately permits unrestricted sale of the qualifying property.

    Sale or other conduct inconsistent with the undertaking during the prescribed period may give rise to serious administrative consequences.

    11.1. Sale After Three Years

    Once the statutory undertaking has been duly fulfilled, the investor may consider selling the property subject to the applicable land registry procedures.

    Sale following lawful completion of the holding period does not automatically mean that Turkish citizenship must be lost.

    11.2. Historical Irregularities

    Nevertheless, expiry of the three-year period does not necessarily prevent subsequent examination of allegations that the original citizenship acquisition was based on fraudulent or legally non-compliant transactions.

    The lawful completion of a holding obligation and the legality of the original investment are separate questions.

    XII. Alternative Routes to Turkish Citizenship Through USD 500,000 Investments

    Foreign investors who do not wish to purchase real estate may consider other investment options, each subject to its own eligibility and verification requirements.

    A. Bank Deposits

    A qualifying deposit of at least USD 500,000 or the legally recognised equivalent may support exceptional citizenship where the amount is maintained for at least three years in a bank operating in Türkiye and the competent authority confirms compliance.

    The Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency is relevant to the conformity determination.

    The bank’s willingness to open an account should not be confused with a final finding that the citizenship investment requirements have been fulfilled.

    The three-year maintenance undertaking, applicable restrictions, banking arrangements, currency conversion rules and early withdrawal consequences should be clarified before the transaction.

    B. Real Estate Investment Funds and Venture Capital Investment Funds

    An investor may qualify by acquiring eligible real estate investment fund or venture capital investment fund participation shares of at least USD 500,000 or the applicable foreign-currency equivalent and retaining those shares for at least three years.

    This investment route is supervised through procedures involving the Capital Markets Board of Türkiye and the Central Securities Depository, known as MKK.

    Compliance requires the relevant investment, ownership records, documentation and applicable blocking or holding arrangements.

    Purchasing fund shares through a financial intermediary does not automatically complete the entire certification process.

    The fund’s investment strategy, liquidity, management expenses, market risks and holding conditions should also be evaluated.

    The Capital Markets Board’s official guidance distinguishes voluntary reductions of holdings from changes in the fund’s value arising independently of the investor’s decision.

    A reduction below the initial USD 500,000 reference amount caused solely by exchange-rate movements does not necessarily have the same consequence as an investor voluntarily disposing of part of the qualifying holding.

    Official source: Capital Markets Board – Exceptional Citizenship Through Investment Funds.

    C. Government Debt Instruments

    Purchasing eligible Turkish government debt instruments with a minimum qualifying amount of USD 500,000 or its legally recognised equivalent may support an application where the instruments are held for the required three-year period.

    The nature of the instruments and compliance determination by the Ministry of Treasury and Finance must be examined.

    Investment risk, maturity and other financial considerations are separate from the nationality eligibility process.

    D. Fixed Capital Investment

    A fixed capital investment of at least USD 500,000 may qualify where the Ministry of Industry and Technology determines that the statutory requirements have been fulfilled.

    However, merely establishing a company or transferring funds to its bank account does not automatically establish that an eligible fixed capital investment has been completed.

    The nature of the investment, acquired assets, financial records and the competent ministry’s examination are relevant.

    E. Employment Creation

    Creating employment for at least 50 persons constitutes another qualifying route under the statutory framework.

    The relevant ministry must determine compliance with the requirements.

    Merely signing employment contracts with 50 people is not necessarily sufficient without examining the actual employment arrangements and official employment records.

    F. Private Pension System

    The private pension investment route requires a qualifying contribution of at least USD 500,000 or its legally recognised equivalent and maintenance of the investment in the prescribed funds and system for three years.

    The Insurance and Private Pension Regulation and Supervision Agency is relevant to the applicable certification process.

    The chosen pension arrangement, investment risks, fund eligibility and conditions governing continued participation should be reviewed.

    Comparative assessment: Property ownership, bank deposits, investment funds, government debt instruments, fixed capital and employment creation involve different financial risks, liquidity conditions and administrative verification requirements.

    The most appropriate investment route depends not only on the minimum amount but also on the investor’s financial circumstances, objectives and legal position.

    XIII. Which Legal and Technical Checks Should Be Completed Before Investing?

    One of the most effective forms of investor protection is comprehensive due diligence conducted before executing the investment.

    In a real estate transaction, this should extend beyond examining a copy of the current title deed.

    13.1. Ownership and Land Registry Examination

    The property’s legal owner, registered characteristics, encumbrances and relevant previous transfers should be verified.

    13.2. Planning and Construction Records

    Depending on the property, zoning records, construction permits, occupancy permits, development plans and the actual physical condition should be considered.

    13.3. The Seller’s Legal Authority

    Where the seller is a construction company, its commercial registry records and authorised representatives should be examined.

    It is necessary to determine whether the person signing the agreement is entitled to dispose of the property.

    13.4. Uncompleted Developments

    For ongoing construction projects, delivery deadlines, construction obligations, contractual remedies, the financial standing of the developer and insolvency-related risks should be considered.

    13.5. Independent Assessment

    Due diligence should not depend exclusively on representations supplied by the seller or marketing company.

    The seller’s commercial interest in completing the transaction may not fully coincide with the investor’s legal interest in obtaining a compliant and secure qualifying investment.

    Independent legal and technical assessments can identify potential inconsistencies before they become disputes.

    XIV. How Does the Turkish Citizenship-by-Investment Application Process Work in 2026?

    Exceptional naturalisation through investment involves several administrative stages.

    14.1. Completion of the Qualifying Investment

    The investor must first complete one of the investment types permitted under Article 20 of the implementing Regulation in accordance with the applicable conditions.

    14.2. Investment Conformity Determination

    The relevant public authority must determine that the investment satisfies the prescribed requirements and issue the appropriate conformity documentation.

    For property investments, land registry transactions, valuation, holding restrictions and the Property Investment Determination Certificate are particularly important.

    14.3. Residence Permit Stage

    The applicant’s short-term residence permit status is examined under Article 31(1)(j) of Law No. 6458 on Foreigners and International Protection.

    The relevant administrative procedure should be assessed according to the applicant’s circumstances and the current implementation rules.

    14.4. Nationality Application

    The investor subsequently submits the citizenship application to the competent population and citizenship authority through the prescribed process.

    Relevant documentation may include identification records, passport information, civil-status documents, information concerning family members and other supporting materials.

    14.5. Security and Public-Order Examination

    The administrative evaluation also includes the applicable national-security and public-order considerations.

    14.6. Final Decision

    The competent state authority issues the decision concerning acquisition of citizenship.

    The completion of a qualifying investment and the issuance of the final citizenship decision are not the same event.

    Investors should not assume that all applications are completed within a guaranteed period. Requests for additional documentation or other administrative examinations may affect processing times.

    Official source: Citizenship Application Procedures – Directorate General of Population and Citizenship Affairs.

    XV. Can the Investor’s Spouse and Children Also Acquire Turkish Citizenship?

    Exceptional naturalisation through investment may include certain qualifying family members, subject to the applicable legal conditions.

    These may include the investor’s foreign spouse and children who meet the relevant statutory requirements.

    However, it should not be assumed that every family member automatically has the same legal status or qualifies independently of their personal circumstances.

    15.1. Age and Dependency

    The child’s age, dependency status and the dates of application and decision may be important.

    For example, special questions may arise where a child is 17 when the family application begins but reaches the age of 18 before the procedure is concluded.

    The applicable administrative rules and the child’s individual legal position must be examined.

    15.2. Marriage and Family Documentation

    Marriage certificates, birth records, custody arrangements and other relevant civil-status documents may need to be submitted in the required authenticated form.

    Differences in names, dates or civil-status records between jurisdictions can create complications.

    15.3. Family Changes During the Application

    Marriage, divorce, the birth of a child or changes in custody during the application period may require further documentation or separate legal consideration.

    A properly prepared family application should address these issues before they delay the process or create future nationality disputes.

    XVI. Can an Investor Complete the Procedures Without Travelling to Türkiye?

    Many prospective investors reside outside Türkiye and wish to conduct part of the investment and application process through an authorised representative.

    Turkish law permits certain transactions and applications to be completed through a valid power of attorney.

    However, property purchases, investment documentation, residence permits and nationality procedures are governed by different requirements.

    16.1. Powers of Attorney

    For transactions undertaken by an attorney-in-fact, the power of attorney must contain the authority required for the relevant legal act.

    A general authorisation for legal representation may not be sufficient for every property transaction or administrative application.

    16.2. Powers of Attorney Issued Abroad

    Foreign powers of attorney may require an apostille or another form of legalisation, depending on the issuing country and applicable international treaties.

    Certified Turkish translations and additional formalities may also be required.

    16.3. Procedures Requiring Personal Attendance

    Certain stages, including biometric enrolment or fingerprinting, may require the individual’s personal presence.

    Accordingly, the ability to purchase property through a representative does not automatically establish that the entire nationality process can be completed without any personal attendance.

    Before issuing the power of attorney, the proposed wording should be reviewed against the requirements of the specific transaction and competent authority.

    XVII. Is Turkish Citizenship Guaranteed After Investing USD 400,000?

    No. The satisfaction of the prescribed investment requirement does not create an unconditional guarantee that Turkish citizenship will be granted.

    Exceptional naturalisation under Article 12 of Law No. 5901 requires a decision by the competent state authority.

    For example, an investor may lawfully purchase qualifying property worth USD 400,000, provide all relevant financial documents and obtain the investment conformity certificate.

    Nevertheless, additional questions may arise during the citizenship examination, including matters relating to security and public order.

    Therefore, completion of the investment documentation is not equivalent to guaranteed approval.

    Private developers, intermediaries, consultancy firms and attorneys should not promise a certain outcome in relation to a decision reserved to the state.

    The proper function of legal advice is to examine compliance, identify risks, assist with the application and protect the applicant’s rights where disputes arise.

    XVIII. What Do the 2025 and 2026 Citizenship Investigations Mean for New Investors?

    Investigations and administrative reviews conducted in 2025 and 2026 have brought attention to earlier citizenship applications involving allegedly irregular property transactions.

    Publicly reported allegations include inflated valuation reports, payments that were not genuinely completed and banking arrangements allegedly structured to simulate investment compliance.

    However, these investigations do not establish that all investment-based citizenship acquisitions were unlawful or that prospective investors are no longer eligible to apply.

    The principal lesson for new investors concerns the importance of understanding how documentary or financial irregularities may arise at different transaction stages.

    The greater the consistency between the actual payment, property valuation, land registry transaction and official conformity certificate, the more transparent the investment’s legal position becomes.

    Investors considering a development linked to a previous investigation should examine whether the relevant circumstances affect the property or transaction under consideration.

    The existence of an investigation concerning a company does not necessarily mean that all its properties are legally ineligible.

    Equally, the absence of a known investigation concerning a seller does not guarantee that a proposed transaction contains no legal risk.

    For further analysis, see our study concerning the investigation involving 1,070 individuals and our review of official figures and international media coverage.

    XIX. Can a New Investor’s Turkish Citizenship Be Cancelled or Withdrawn in the Future?

    Acquisition of Turkish citizenship does not mean that the original decision is necessarily immune from all subsequent legal examination.

    Articles 31 and 40 of Turkish Citizenship Law No. 5901 provide distinct legal mechanisms.

    19.1. Article 31: Cancellation Based on False Declarations or Concealment

    Article 31 concerns cancellation where the individual acquired citizenship through false declarations or concealment of material circumstances forming the basis of the decision.

    The nature of the individual’s conduct and its connection with the original acquisition must be examined.

    19.2. Article 40: Withdrawal Because the Statutory Conditions Were Absent

    Article 40 addresses withdrawal where the citizenship decision was issued without the required legal conditions or as a duplicate.

    It therefore raises a different legal question concerning whether the objective requirements for acquisition were present at the time.

    19.3. The Importance of Good Faith

    Suppose an investor genuinely pays the purchase price but the developer is subsequently accused of deliberately inflating the appraisal.

    The investor’s knowledge of the irregularity and the actual value of the property on the relevant date are distinct questions.

    Even if the investor prepared no forged document, a separate administrative dispute may arise if the property’s genuine historical value failed to satisfy the applicable minimum requirement.

    Accordingly, avoiding fraudulent conduct is essential, but the investor should also ensure that the transaction objectively satisfies the statutory conditions.

    For detailed discussion, see Can a Genuine Investor Lose Turkish Citizenship? Property Valuation Errors, Banking Evidence and Judicial Protection.

    XX. Which Contractual Safeguards Should Protect a Foreign Investor?

    A real estate sale agreement intended to support Turkish citizenship should do more than identify the property and purchase price.

    The parties’ obligations relating to the citizenship investment transaction should be expressly addressed where appropriate.

    20.1. Representations Concerning Legal Eligibility

    The seller may provide contractual representations concerning the property’s legal characteristics, disclosed encumbrances, previous ownership and information known to affect its suitability for the intended investment.

    20.2. Conditions Precedent to Payment

    Where the official valuation or legal eligibility has not yet been confirmed, it may be appropriate to link payment obligations to specified preliminary conditions, provided that the arrangement remains consistent with the relevant citizenship investment requirements.

    20.3. Remedies for Contractual Non-Compliance

    The agreement may address the consequences of failure to transfer the property, defects in title, inaccuracies in contractual representations and breaches of the seller’s obligations.

    Depending on the transaction, withdrawal rights, repayment conditions, agreed contractual remedies and compensation arrangements may be considered.

    20.4. Secure Payment Arrangements

    Transferring the entire purchase price before obtaining the relevant protections may expose an investor to substantial financial risk.

    Any escrow, staged payment or alternative protection arrangement must be structured consistently with the banking and payment documentation required for a qualifying citizenship investment.

    20.5. The Limits of Contractual Guarantees

    A seller cannot contractually bind the Turkish state to grant citizenship.

    However, the seller may accept enforceable private-law obligations concerning its own representations, contractual performance and the consequences of its misconduct.

    The distinction between guaranteeing the state’s nationality decision and assuming contractual liability for the seller’s own conduct is fundamental.

    XXI. What Legal Remedies Are Available If a Citizenship Application Is Rejected?

    Where an investment-based citizenship application is rejected, the first task is to identify the legal nature and reasons for the adverse decision.

    For example, refusal to issue an investment certificate of conformity is not necessarily the same administrative act as a final refusal of naturalisation.

    The issuing authority, applicable legal rules, procedural requirements, filing deadline and competent court may differ.

    21.1. Administrative Judicial Review

    Under Article 7 of Administrative Judicial Procedure Law No. 2577, the general filing period in administrative litigation is 60 days unless another applicable statutory period is prescribed.

    However, the starting date, competent judicial authority and available remedies must be examined in the context of the actual decision.

    21.2. Contractual and Financial Remedies

    An investor may also consider rights arising from the property purchase contract where the seller failed to fulfil its own obligations.

    These may involve restitution, termination or compensation under the applicable private-law rules.

    Such claims are distinct from an administrative action challenging a citizenship decision.

    21.3. The State Is Not Automatically Responsible for Refunding a Property Purchase

    Rejection of a nationality application does not automatically require the Turkish state to refund the price paid to a private seller.

    Any claim for repayment or damages must be based on the relevant contractual or statutory grounds and assessed according to the facts.

    A single standard lawsuit should not be assumed to address every consequence of a rejected investment-based citizenship application.

    XXII. Frequently Asked Questions About Turkish Citizenship by Investment in 2026

    1. Has Türkiye closed its citizenship-by-investment programme?

    No. As of October 22, 2026, the relevant legal framework and official public guidance continue to recognise exceptional naturalisation through qualifying investment.

    2. Does investing USD 400,000 guarantee Turkish citizenship?

    No. The investment must satisfy all relevant legal conditions, and the competent authority must issue a positive naturalisation decision.

    3. Can I qualify by purchasing undeveloped land?

    Undeveloped land without the required buildings and agricultural property cannot be used as qualifying property investments under the relevant rules applicable in 2026.

    4. Can I buy two apartments worth USD 200,000 each?

    Multiple eligible properties may be combined. However, each transaction must satisfy the relevant legal and documentation requirements, and the officially accepted aggregate amount must reach the required threshold.

    5. Can I sell my property after three years?

    Sale may be possible after lawful completion of the holding requirement and the necessary land registry procedures. Historical irregularities in the original investment may nevertheless remain subject to lawful examination.

    6. Does depositing USD 500,000 in a Turkish bank guarantee citizenship?

    No. The qualifying deposit and official conformity determination form part of the process. The final nationality decision is separate.

    7. Can I complete the process without visiting Türkiye?

    Certain transactions may be conducted through a valid representative. However, some residence or citizenship stages, including biometric procedures, may require personal attendance.

    8. How long does the citizenship application take?

    There is no universal guaranteed processing period. The relevant investment, documentation, security examination and administrative procedures may affect the timeline.

    9. Can my spouse and children obtain citizenship?

    Eligible family members may be included under the applicable conditions. Age, dependency, civil status and documentation must be assessed individually.

    10. Can a new investor’s citizenship later be cancelled?

    Possible future cancellation or withdrawal depends on the statutory grounds and the individual facts. The mere existence of investigations concerning earlier investors does not establish that every new application is at risk.

    11. Is relying on the official valuation company sufficient?

    Proper official valuation is important, but independent verification of the property’s legal and economic characteristics may provide additional protection.

    12. If my citizenship application is rejected, will the government refund my investment?

    Not automatically. Reimbursement or compensation may depend on the relevant contract and the legal responsibility of the parties involved.

    XXIII. Conclusion: Legal Security Should Be the Priority in Citizenship-by-Investment Transactions

    Exceptional acquisition of Turkish citizenship through investment remains legally possible in 2026.

    Qualifying routes include real estate purchases, bank deposits, fixed capital investment, investment funds, government debt instruments, private pension investments and employment creation.

    Nevertheless, the legality of a citizenship application cannot be determined solely by the amount invested.

    For property-based naturalisation, the property’s legal characteristics, historical ownership, genuine market value, banking records, foreign-exchange procedures, TTB documentation and three-year holding obligations must be examined together.

    The administrative reviews and criminal investigations of 2025 and 2026 demonstrate why prospective investors should not focus exclusively on obtaining an initial citizenship approval.

    The relevant legal conditions must actually exist when the citizenship decision is granted, and the investment should be capable of being substantiated through reliable documentation if subsequently examined.

    Accordingly, investor protection should not depend solely on a certificate of conformity or on promises made by a developer, broker or intermediary.

    Independent examination of the investment’s legal and economic characteristics, transparent banking procedures, appropriate valuation, properly prepared contracts and an accurate understanding of the administrative process are essential.

    The existence of cancellation and withdrawal mechanisms under Articles 31 and 40 of Turkish Citizenship Law No. 5901 further demonstrates the importance of legal due diligence before the investment is completed.

    The fundamental objective for a prospective investor in 2026 should not be merely to make a sufficiently large investment, but to complete a genuine, legally compliant, verifiable investment supported by reliable official records.

    The authority to grant Turkish citizenship belongs to the Turkish state. At the same time, protecting the investor’s ownership rights, financial interests and legal security must remain a central concern from the very beginning of the transaction.

    Legislation, Official Sources and Academic References

    1. Turkish Citizenship Law No. 5901. Particularly Articles 12, 31 and 40. Official legislation.
    2. Regulation on the Implementation of the Turkish Citizenship Law. Particularly Article 20 and the relevant amendments.
    3. Land Registry Law No. 2644. Particularly Articles 35 and 36.
    4. Law No. 6458 on Foreigners and International Protection. Particularly Article 31(1)(j).
    5. General Directorate of Land Registry and Cadastre. Circular No. 2024/4, including amendments applicable in September and October 2026, concerning citizenship through real estate acquisition and investment amount determination. Your Key Türkiye.
    6. General Directorate of Land Registry and Cadastre. Circular No. 2024/2 and relevant valuation procedures. Official TTB information.
    7. Directorate General of Population and Citizenship Affairs. Citizenship Services – Frequently Asked Questions. Official information.
    8. Invest in Türkiye. Acquiring Property and Citizenship – Investment Guide. Official English-language guide.
    9. Capital Markets Board of Türkiye. Exceptional Acquisition of Turkish Citizenship Through Investment. Official regulatory guidance.
    10. Özgür, Çiçek. “Yatırım Yoluyla Kazanılan Türk Vatandaşlığının İptali ve Geri Alınması” [Cancellation and Withdrawal of Turkish Citizenship Acquired Through Investment]. Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Vol. 75, No. 1, 2026, pp. 741–779. DOI: 10.33629/auhfd.1710185.
    11. Dülger, Ahmet. “Taşınmaz Satın Alınmasıyla Türk Vatandaşlığının İstisnai Yoldan Kazanılmasında Değerleme Raporu ve Uygunluk Belgesi Alınması” [Valuation Reports and Certificates of Conformity in Exceptional Turkish Citizenship Acquisition Through Property Purchase]. İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2025, pp. 167–180. DOI: 10.21492/inuhfd.1600688.
    12. Administrative Judicial Procedure Law No. 2577. Particularly Articles 7, 11 and 27, concerning filing periods, administrative applications and suspension of execution.

    Author and Contact Information

    Attorney Murat Can Dolğun
    Istanbul Bar Association
    TD Law Firm & Legal Consultancy
    Lecturer in Law – Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa

    Practice Areas: Turkish Citizenship Law, Immigration Law, Administrative Litigation, Criminal Defence, Private International Law, Real Estate Law and Foreign Investment.

    Office: Istanbul World Trade Center (IDTM), Block A2, Floor 5, Office 206, Yeşilköy, Bakırköy, Istanbul, Türkiye.

    Telephone: +90 212 299 44 22
    WhatsApp: +90 507 475 44 22
    Website: dolgun.av.tr

    Legal Disclaimer: This article is intended for general academic and legal information. It does not constitute individual legal or financial advice, nor does it guarantee Turkish citizenship, a particular investment result or the outcome of administrative proceedings. Laws, investment requirements, valuation procedures and administrative practices may change. The current legal framework and the relevant investor’s individual circumstances should be verified before completing any transaction.

    © 2026 DOLĞUN AKADEMİ | ATTORNEY MURAT CAN DOLĞUN

  • REVOCATION AND WITHDRAWAL OF TURKISH CITIZENSHIP IN 2026: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS, CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS, LITIGATION AND FILE REVIEW

    REVOCATION AND WITHDRAWAL OF TURKISH CITIZENSHIP IN 2026: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS, CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS, LITIGATION AND FILE REVIEW

    Updated: 28 September 2026

    In recent months, the questions most frequently raised by foreign nationals who acquired Turkish citizenship through real estate investment have changed significantly.

    Investors are no longer asking only:

    “Can my Turkish citizenship be revoked?”

    They are now asking:

    “Has my Turkish citizenship already been cancelled?”

    “Am I involved in a criminal investigation?”

    “Could I be detained if I enter Türkiye?”

    “My e-devlet account still works. Does that mean I am still a Turkish citizen?”

    “I did not prepare the valuation report. Can I still face consequences?”

    “Can a Turkish lawyer investigate my case before I issue a power of attorney?”

    “I live abroad and have received no notice at all. How can I find out what has happened to my citizenship?”

    These questions have become particularly important because of the criminal investigations and administrative reviews concerning citizenship-by-investment files that began attracting significant public attention in 2025 and expanded considerably during 2026.

    We previously examined the legal framework in detail in our article dated 19 September 2026, titled:

    “Revocation and Withdrawal of Turkish Citizenship Acquired Through Investment: False Valuation Reports, Sham Transactions, Good-Faith Investors and Judicial Protection.”

    In that article, we addressed in particular the distinction between revocation under Article 31 of Turkish Citizenship Law No. 5901 and withdrawal under Article 40, as well as property valuation reports, good faith of the investor, genuine financial transfers and relevant Council of State case law.

    Following the second major investigation announced on 21 September 2026, we also published a separate article on 26 September 2026 titled:

    “The 2026 Turkish Citizenship Cancellation Process Affecting 1,070 Persons.”

    That article examined the investigation concerning 263 principal investors and 807 family members in greater detail.

    This article complements those two studies and provides an updated guide to the questions that should be asked immediately by any person whose Turkish citizenship has been revoked, whose investment is under investigation, or who suspects that his or her citizenship may be at risk.

    WHAT CHANGED IN 2026 AND WHY ARE SO MANY CITIZENSHIP FILES BEING REVIEWED?

    Large-scale reviews of Turkish citizenship acquired through investment began receiving significant public attention in 2025.

    In an investigation announced on 24 September 2025, transactions involving 451 foreign investors and citizenship acquisitions covering 1,198 persons together with their family members were examined.

    Authorities alleged, among other matters, that the required foreign currency had not actually entered Türkiye, fictitious financial transactions had been created, certain real estate sales were sham transactions and some properties had been shown at values exceeding their actual market value.

    Publicly announced allegations in that investigation included offences such as establishing an organisation for the purpose of committing crimes, migrant smuggling, laundering of assets derived from crime, aggravated fraud and forgery of private documents.

    A further investigation was announced on 4 August 2026 under the coordination of the Organised Crime Investigation Bureau of the Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office.

    The Ministry of Justice stated that legal proceedings had been initiated concerning the citizenship status of 687 persons in connection with allegations that low-value properties had been shown at substantially higher values through false valuation reports and that Turkish citizenship had been obtained through sham real estate transactions.

    Authorities also alleged that approximately TRY 2.5 billion that should have entered Türkiye in connection with these investment transactions had not in fact entered the country.

    A second major operation was announced on 21 September 2026.

    Authorities stated that real estate sales to 734 foreign nationals had been examined, that 274 sales were considered to be sham transactions, and that 1,070 persons had acquired citizenship when family members were included.

    Of these individuals, 263 were principal investors and 807 were family members.

    It was also reported that 1,015 persons acquired citizenship at the time of the principal citizenship decisions, while 55 children acquired Turkish citizenship subsequently.

    According to the investigating authorities, transactions amounting to USD 72.25 million were considered to involve sham arrangements.

    By 25 September 2026, 33 suspects detained in connection with this second investigation had been remanded in custody, while 20 persons were reportedly subjected to judicial control measures requiring them to remain at their residences.

    During the same period, the Ministry of Interior announced considerably broader figures.

    According to the Ministry, investment eligibility certificates of 1,150 investors had been cancelled in connection with false or irregular valuation reports, and the citizenship decisions concerning those investors and their family members, totalling 5,391 persons, had been cancelled.

    In addition, citizenship decisions concerning 263 investors and their family members, totalling 743 persons, were reportedly withdrawn following assessments relating to public order and national security.

    The total number announced was therefore 6,134 persons.

    It is essential to understand that these figures do not necessarily relate to one investigation, one legal ground, one developer or one group of investors.

    Each investor’s individual file must be examined separately.

    1. CAN TURKISH CITIZENSHIP BE REVOKED AFTER IT HAS BEEN GRANTED?

    Yes.

    The fact that Turkish citizenship has already been acquired does not mean that the citizenship decision can never subsequently be reviewed.

    Article 31 of Turkish Citizenship Law No. 5901 provides for revocation where citizenship was acquired as a result of a false declaration by the person concerned or the concealment of important matters affecting the acquisition of citizenship.

    Article 40 regulates withdrawal of a citizenship decision where it is subsequently established that the legal requirements for acquisition were not actually satisfied or that the decision was issued repetitively.

    Revocation and withdrawal are not the same legal mechanism.

    One of the first matters that must therefore be determined in a citizenship case is the precise legal basis relied upon by the administration.

    2. WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN REVOCATION OF CITIZENSHIP AND WITHDRAWAL OF THE CITIZENSHIP DECISION?

    This distinction is central to the case.

    Under Article 31, the principal question is:

    Was Turkish citizenship acquired because of the investor’s own false declaration or concealment of an important fact?

    Under Article 40, a different question arises:

    Were the objective legal conditions for the acquisition of citizenship actually satisfied at the time the citizenship decision was issued?

    Accordingly, the absence of fraudulent conduct by the investor does not necessarily resolve every issue that may arise under Article 40.

    Conversely, the fact that the objective investment criteria appear to have been satisfied does not necessarily eliminate an Article 31 issue where the investor knowingly relied upon false documentation or misleading declarations.

    We discussed this distinction in greater detail in our previous article dated 19 September 2026.

    3. HAVE THE CITIZENSHIPS OF ALL 1,070 PERSONS ALREADY BEEN CANCELLED?

    The publicly available information should not be interpreted in that manner.

    The announcement made on 21 September 2026 stated that 1,070 persons had been identified within the scope of the investigation and that the necessary administrative process concerning their citizenship status had been initiated.

    Several stages must therefore be distinguished.

    Identification of a person or transaction in a criminal investigation is one stage.

    Cancellation of the investment eligibility certificate is another administrative measure.

    Revocation or withdrawal of the citizenship decision is a separate administrative act.

    Notification of that act to the person concerned is another stage.

    Judicial proceedings challenging the administrative measure constitute a further stage.

    Therefore, merely learning that an investor may be included among the group of 1,070 persons is not sufficient to determine his or her current legal status.

    4. WHAT DOES THE ANNOUNCEMENT CONCERNING 6,134 PERSONS MEAN?

    The Ministry of Interior announced that citizenship acquisition decisions concerning a total of 6,134 persons, including investors and their family members, had been cancelled or withdrawn.

    Different legal grounds were involved within that overall figure.

    According to the publicly announced information, 5,391 persons were affected by cancellation measures associated with investment eligibility certificates and irregularities in the investment process.

    A further 743 persons were affected by withdrawal decisions connected with assessments relating to public order and national security.

    The figure of 6,134 therefore does not represent one criminal investigation or the customers of one developer.

    5. DOES THE EXISTENCE OF A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION MEAN THAT MY CITIZENSHIP HAS ALREADY BEEN REVOKED?

    No.

    A criminal investigation and an administrative decision concerning Turkish citizenship are legally separate processes.

    However, given the structure of the investigations conducted in 2025 and 2026, learning that an investor or the transaction through which citizenship was obtained is being investigated may be a significant indication that the citizenship file is also being reviewed.

    For example, where investigating authorities allege that a particular sale was fictitious, that the investment amount was never genuinely paid, or that the valuation report was inaccurate, those same facts may also become relevant to an administrative citizenship review.

    Nevertheless, the existence of a criminal investigation and the existence of an individual administrative decision terminating citizenship must not be treated as the same thing.

    Both files should be checked separately.

    6. I LIVE ABROAD AND KNOW NOTHING ABOUT THE CASE. COULD THE EXISTENCE OF AN INVESTIGATION INDICATE THAT MY CITIZENSHIP MAY ALREADY HAVE BEEN CANCELLED?

    Yes. In the current environment, that possibility should be taken seriously.

    A person who has lived abroad for several years, no longer communicates with the former developer or real estate company in Türkiye, and does not actively monitor his or her Turkish address records may remain unaware of administrative and criminal proceedings for a considerable period.

    This is particularly relevant where the property, developer, intermediary company or valuation report used in the citizenship application is connected with one of the investigations currently being conducted.

    The existence of such a criminal investigation may indicate that an administrative review, revocation procedure or withdrawal procedure has also been initiated in relation to the citizenship file.

    However, a possible risk must be distinguished from an actual citizenship decision already issued against the individual.

    For a person living abroad, it may therefore be necessary to examine separately:

    whether a criminal investigation exists;

    the person’s procedural status in that investigation;

    the current status of the citizenship file;

    the status of the investment eligibility certificate;

    whether an individual revocation or withdrawal decision has been issued;

    whether such a decision has been served;

    and whether there is any arrest warrant, summons, judicial control measure or other restriction relevant to entry into Türkiye.

    These checks may be particularly important before booking travel to Türkiye.

    7. COULD I BE DETAINED AT THE AIRPORT IF I RETURN TO TÜRKİYE?

    The answer cannot be determined from citizenship status alone.

    If a criminal investigation exists, it is also necessary to determine whether there is an arrest warrant, detention order, instruction to obtain a statement, judicial control measure, travel restriction or another criminal procedural measure.

    If Turkish citizenship has already ceased, the conditions applicable to the individual’s entry into Türkiye as a foreign national may also need to be examined.

    Accordingly, at least three separate matters should be reviewed before travel:

    the person’s citizenship status;

    the criminal investigation and any procedural measures;

    and the conditions applicable to entry into Türkiye as a foreign national.

    A person living abroad should not rely solely on the fact that a Turkish passport remains physically in his or her possession.

    8. WHY CAN A CITIZENSHIP FILE LEAD TO A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION?

    Because the allegations raised in the current investigations are not limited to whether the administrative requirements for citizenship were satisfied.

    Investigating authorities have alleged in various files that fictitious financial movements were created, real estate transactions were structured as sham transactions, property values were misrepresented and false or misleading documents were used.

    Where authorities allege that a person knowingly participated in such conduct, a criminal investigation may arise independently of the citizenship proceedings.

    9. WHICH CRIMINAL OFFENCES MAY BE INVESTIGATED IN CONNECTION WITH CITIZENSHIP-BY-INVESTMENT CASES?

    Different criminal allegations have appeared in publicly announced investigations conducted during 2025 and 2026.

    Depending on the facts of the individual file, the offences under investigation may include:

    establishing, managing or participating in a criminal organisation;

    migrant smuggling;

    fraud or aggravated fraud, including allegations involving public authorities;

    forgery of official documents;

    forgery of private documents;

    false declaration in the preparation of an official document;

    and laundering of assets derived from criminal activity.

    The fact that such offences appear in a criminal investigation does not mean that every foreign investor is suspected of all or any of these offences.

    Criminal responsibility is personal.

    A person who merely purchased a property from a particular developer is not in the same legal position as a person alleged to have knowingly participated in the preparation of false valuation reports or fictitious financial transfers.

    The precise conduct attributed to the individual investor must therefore be identified.

    10. IF THE DEVELOPER IS UNDER CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION, AM I ALSO A SUSPECT?

    That conclusion cannot be drawn merely from the commercial relationship.

    A company may have sold properties to hundreds of foreign nationals.

    Certain transactions may be alleged to have been irregular while other investors may have genuinely paid the full investment amount.

    Indeed, in the second investigation announced on 21 September 2026, authorities stated that 734 foreign purchasers had been examined but referred to 274 sales as allegedly involving sham transactions.

    This itself demonstrates that each transaction must be assessed individually.

    11. I DID NOT PREPARE THE VALUATION REPORT. CAN MY CITIZENSHIP STILL BE AFFECTED?

    The distinction between Articles 31 and 40 is again important.

    For Article 31 purposes, the investor’s own false declaration or concealment of important information is highly relevant.

    If a valuation report was prepared by an authorised valuation professional and the investor had no knowledge that the report was inaccurate, this may be significant when assessing the investor’s personal conduct.

    However, under Article 40, the administration may argue that the objective investment criteria were never actually satisfied when citizenship was granted.

    Accordingly, “I did not prepare the valuation report” may be an important part of the defence, but it should not be treated as the entire defence.

    The actual historical value of the property must also be examined.

    12. CAN THE ACTUAL VALUE OF THE PROPERTY HELP PROTECT MY CITIZENSHIP?

    Depending on the facts, it may be extremely important.

    Assume, for example, that the applicable citizenship threshold at the time of investment was USD 250,000.

    An old valuation report may have stated that the property was worth USD 400,000, but authorities may now allege that the report was inaccurate.

    The relevant economic question is then:

    What was the real market value of the property on the relevant historical date?

    Was it USD 150,000?

    USD 280,000?

    USD 400,000?

    If the genuine historical value exceeded the legal investment threshold applicable at the time, that fact may be important to the legal defence.

    For this reason, an independent retrospective valuation may be appropriate in certain cases.

    13. DOES TODAY’S USD 400,000 INVESTMENT REQUIREMENT APPLY TO MY OLD CITIZENSHIP APPLICATION?

    An old investment file must be examined under the legislation applicable at the time of the investment.

    The required investment amount has changed over the years.

    A person who acquired citizenship during a period in which the applicable threshold was USD 250,000 should not have the historical investment tested against the present USD 400,000 threshold.

    The investment date, title deed date, eligibility certificate date, citizenship application date and citizenship decision date must all be identified.

    14. I REALLY SENT THE MONEY THROUGH THE BANK. DOES THIS PROTECT ME?

    A genuine bank transfer may be one of the most important pieces of evidence in the investor’s file.

    However, one payment receipt may not be sufficient.

    The current investigations frequently focus on the economic reality of the entire money flow.

    It may therefore be necessary to examine:

    the source of the funds;

    the transfer from the investor’s account;

    the entry of the funds into Türkiye;

    payment to the seller;

    the date and currency of the transfer;

    and whether any part of the funds was subsequently returned directly or indirectly to the investor or a related person.

    The legal position of an investor who genuinely paid the investment amount is materially different from that of a person alleged to have knowingly participated in a merely apparent transfer.

    15. WHAT IF PART OF THE PURCHASE PRICE WAS LATER RETURNED TO ME?

    This may constitute one of the most sensitive issues in the case.

    If authorities allege that the required investment amount was transferred only for appearance and that a significant part of the money was subsequently returned pursuant to a prior arrangement, the genuine economic nature of the investment may be questioned.

    However, not every repayment has the same legal significance.

    The date, amount, purpose, contractual basis and parties involved in any repayment must be examined carefully.

    Investors should therefore retain complete bank statements and supporting documentation.

    16. I ACTED IN GOOD FAITH. IS THAT ENOUGH?

    Good faith may be highly significant, particularly under Article 31.

    An investor may have genuinely paid the full investment amount, received no concealed refund, completed the official title deed transaction, relied on a valuation report prepared within the authorised system, obtained an investment eligibility certificate and submitted no false document or false declaration.

    That investor is not in the same legal position as a person alleged to have knowingly participated in an artificial citizenship scheme.

    Nevertheless, where authorities argue that the objective statutory requirements were never satisfied, Article 40 must also be considered.

    17. DOES THE FACT THAT I RECEIVED AN INVESTMENT ELIGIBILITY CERTIFICATE PROTECT ME?

    The investment eligibility certificate is an important administrative document.

    A foreign investor does not obtain citizenship simply on the basis of his or her own statement.

    The investment is examined through official administrative procedures and an eligibility certificate is issued if the competent authority concludes that the statutory investment conditions have been satisfied.

    The fact that the investor relied upon an official state-supervised process may therefore be relevant to legal certainty, administrative stability and good faith.

    However, the previous issuance of an eligibility certificate does not prevent later administrative review.

    It is therefore important to determine whether the eligibility certificate has subsequently been cancelled.

    18. IF MY INVESTMENT ELIGIBILITY CERTIFICATE WAS CANCELLED, DOES THAT MEAN MY CITIZENSHIP HAS ALSO BEEN CANCELLED?

    The cancellation of an investment eligibility certificate and the revocation or withdrawal of a citizenship decision are legally separate administrative acts.

    They may be closely connected, but they are not identical.

    The precise sequence of the administrative measures must therefore be established.

    19. MY E-GOVERNMENT ACCOUNT STILL WORKS. DOES THAT PROVE THAT I AM STILL A TURKISH CITIZEN?

    Not by itself.

    Different government databases may not necessarily be updated at precisely the same time.

    Access to an e-Government account should therefore not be treated as the sole method of determining current citizenship status.

    A person who becomes aware that his or her investment project or developer is involved in a current investigation should consider having the official citizenship status checked separately.

    20. I STILL PHYSICALLY HAVE MY TURKISH PASSPORT. DOES THAT MEAN I AM STILL A TURKISH CITIZEN?

    The physical possession of a Turkish passport is not, by itself, conclusive evidence of current citizenship status.

    This is especially important for investors living abroad.

    Before travelling, it may be appropriate to verify both current citizenship status and the status of the passport.

    21. WHAT HAPPENS TO MY SPOUSE AND CHILDREN IF MY CITIZENSHIP IS REVOKED?

    Article 32 of Turkish Citizenship Law provides that a revocation decision may also affect a spouse and children who acquired Turkish citizenship in connection with the person concerned.

    However, the legal basis and date on which each family member acquired citizenship should be examined separately.

    The investigation announced on 21 September 2026 involved 263 principal investors and 807 family members.

    It was also reported that 55 children acquired citizenship after the original citizenship decisions had already been issued.

    The legal position of children born or registered subsequently may therefore require separate analysis.

    22. IF MY CITIZENSHIP IS REVOKED, WILL I LOSE MY PROPERTY IN TÜRKİYE?

    Loss of citizenship and loss of ownership of real estate are not the same legal event.

    Article 33 of Turkish Citizenship Law contains special provisions concerning the liquidation of property belonging to persons whose citizenship has been revoked.

    Where liquidation of assets is considered necessary, this is required to be stated in the relevant decision.

    The law also provides that where the person challenges the revocation decision before the courts, liquidation of the assets is postponed until the conclusion of the proceedings.

    Accordingly, no reliable conclusion concerning the property should be reached without examining the full wording of the administrative decision.

    23. CAN I FILE A LAWSUIT AGAINST THE REVOCATION OR WITHDRAWAL OF MY TURKISH CITIZENSHIP?

    Yes.

    A decision revoking citizenship or withdrawing the citizenship acquisition decision is an administrative act and is subject to judicial review.

    The competent court depends on the authority that issued the challenged decision.

    Certain citizenship decisions issued by the President may fall within the jurisdiction of the Council of State acting as the court of first instance.

    It should also be remembered that cancellation of an investment eligibility certificate and termination of citizenship may constitute separate administrative measures.

    In some cases, more than one administrative act therefore needs to be examined.

    24. HOW LONG DO I HAVE TO FILE A CITIZENSHIP CANCELLATION CASE?

    Where no special period is prescribed, the general time limit for administrative proceedings before administrative courts and the Council of State is ordinarily 60 days.

    The period generally begins on the day following written notification.

    However, the method of service, the authority issuing the decision, any prior administrative application and the specific administrative act being challenged may affect the calculation.

    A person who has received a citizenship decision should therefore not calculate the litigation deadline on assumptions.

    25. CAN I REQUEST A STAY OF EXECUTION IN A CITIZENSHIP CASE?

    Yes, where the statutory requirements are satisfied.

    Loss of citizenship may affect the person’s passport, ability to enter Türkiye, family life, companies, bank relationships, real estate and other legal interests.

    For that reason, an application for a stay of execution should identify the concrete consequences that the administrative act creates for the individual concerned.

    Filing a lawsuit does not by itself suspend the implementation of the administrative decision.

    26. CAN A LAWYER CHECK WHETHER THERE IS A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION AGAINST ME?

    Yes, although the criminal investigation and the citizenship file must be examined through different channels.

    In relation to the criminal file, it may first be necessary to determine:

    the competent Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office;

    the investigation number;

    the person’s procedural status;

    the offences under investigation;

    and whether any criminal procedural measure exists.

    The citizenship file should separately be examined through the Directorate General of Population and Citizenship Affairs and other relevant administrative records.

    Information found in one file does not necessarily establish the status of the other.

    27. CAN A LAWYER INSPECT A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION FILE WITHOUT A POWER OF ATTORNEY?

    This question is particularly important for persons living abroad who have not yet issued a Turkish power of attorney.

    Article 2 of the Attorneys’ Act No. 1136 provides that judicial authorities, law-enforcement authorities and other public institutions are, subject to specific statutory restrictions, required to make available to lawyers the information and documents needed for the performance of their professional duties.

    Obtaining copies of documents may require presentation of a power of attorney.

    Article 46 of the Attorneys’ Act also provides that a lawyer or trainee lawyer may inspect court and enforcement files without submitting a power of attorney, while copies of documents are not provided to a lawyer who has not produced the relevant authority.

    In the context of criminal investigations, the Union of Turkish Bar Associations published Notice No. 2019/32 dated 10 April 2019 referring to a judicial decision confirming that a lawyer may inspect an investigation file without a power of attorney, formal appointment document or written or oral consent from a party to the investigation.

    An earlier Notice No. 2019/23 also addressed procedures applicable where a lawyer does not yet have a power of attorney or UYAP registration and seeks to inspect an investigation file after identifying the party concerned and presenting professional identification.

    Accordingly, the fact that a person living abroad has not yet issued a power of attorney does not necessarily mean that no preliminary investigation of the criminal file can be undertaken.

    However, full and continuing access to the file, obtaining copies, making applications on behalf of the person, accessing the file continuously through UYAP and performing comprehensive defence work may require the establishment of a formal attorney-client representation.

    28. IF THERE IS A RESTRICTION ORDER IN THE CRIMINAL FILE, DOES THAT MEAN THE LAWYER CANNOT SEE ANYTHING?

    No.

    Under Article 153 of the Turkish Code of Criminal Procedure, where access to the investigation file would jeopardise the purpose of the investigation, a judge may restrict file inspection upon the request of the public prosecutor in cases permitted by law.

    However, even where such a restriction exists, certain materials remain outside the restriction, including the statement of the arrested person or suspect, expert reports and records of judicial acts at which the suspect is entitled to be present.

    This distinction may be particularly important in citizenship-related investigations because expert reports may contain key findings concerning property valuations and financial transactions.

    29. CAN A LAWYER INSPECT MY CITIZENSHIP FILE WITHOUT A POWER OF ATTORNEY?

    The criminal investigation and the administrative citizenship file must again be distinguished.

    Article 2 of the Attorneys’ Act provides a general basis for lawyers to request access to information and documents needed for professional duties, subject to special statutory restrictions.

    Obtaining copies generally requires presentation of authority.

    Citizenship files, however, may contain personal data, security assessments and information specific to the individual.

    For this reason, special legislation and the practice of the relevant administrative authority must also be considered.

    In practice, certain information may potentially be reviewed or preliminary enquiries may be made without a power of attorney.

    However, obtaining complete copies of the individual’s citizenship file, making formal applications on behalf of the person, requesting official records or performing transactions concerning population registers may require a valid power of attorney.

    Accordingly, a power of attorney becomes particularly important where an official confirmation of citizenship status or formal action before the Population and Citizenship authorities is required.

    30. I AM ABROAD. WHAT CAN A LAWYER CHECK BEFORE I ISSUE A POWER OF ATTORNEY?

    The answer depends on the type of case.

    In relation to a criminal investigation, it may be possible to identify the relevant investigation and inspect accessible portions of the file within the limits of Turkish law.

    Under Article 2 of the Attorneys’ Act, access to information and documents held by public institutions may also be requested where legally permissible.

    Existing court or enforcement files may be physically inspected without a power of attorney.

    Publicly available information concerning investigations, companies and projects may be examined.

    It may also be possible to determine whether the person’s transaction appears to be connected with a publicly announced investigation.

    However, making formal applications on behalf of the client, obtaining official copies, filing an administrative case, conducting formal transactions before population authorities or undertaking comprehensive defence work in a criminal investigation may require a power of attorney.

    For a client living abroad, the work may therefore proceed in two stages:

    first, preliminary identification of the investigation and the immediate legal risks;

    second, full representation under a power of attorney where required.

    31. CAN A STATEMENT TO THE PROSECUTOR OR POLICE BE ARRANGED BEFORE I TRAVEL TO TÜRKİYE?

    Depending on the stage of the investigation, contact may be established with the public prosecutor or the law-enforcement unit conducting the investigation in order to clarify or plan the taking of a statement.

    However, the position is different where an arrest warrant or another coercive measure has already been issued.

    The current procedural status should therefore be checked before travel arrangements are finalised.

    32. CAN I FIND OUT IN ADVANCE WHETHER THERE IS AN ARREST WARRANT AGAINST ME?

    Depending on the accessible portions of the investigation file and the nature of the proceedings, relevant information may be investigated.

    However, the confidentiality of criminal investigations, access restrictions and the nature of law-enforcement measures may mean that not every piece of information is available at every stage.

    For this reason, reliance solely on an e-Government screen may be insufficient.

    The criminal investigation should be examined separately by a lawyer.

    33. WHAT IF MY CITIZENSHIP WAS CANCELLED BUT I NEVER RECEIVED ANY NOTIFICATION?

    The first issue is to determine whether an individual decision actually exists.

    If a decision has been issued, the following questions become important:

    when was it issued;

    to which address was it sent;

    how was service attempted;

    what procedure was followed for a person living abroad;

    and when did the person actually become aware of the decision?

    These issues may directly affect the calculation of the litigation period.

    In such cases, the service documents may be as important as the citizenship decision itself.

    34. WHAT SHOULD I DO IF THE AUTHORITIES SAY MY CITIZENSHIP HAS BEEN CANCELLED BUT E-GOVERNMENT STILL SHOWS ME AS A TURKISH CITIZEN?

    Where there is a conflict between different sources of information, the formal administrative decision and official population records should be examined together.

    A person should not rely solely upon a digital screenshot before undertaking important legal actions such as international travel, passport renewal, title deed transactions or entry into Türkiye.

    35. I GAVE UP MY PREVIOUS NATIONALITY. COULD I BECOME STATELESS IF TURKISH CITIZENSHIP IS REVOKED?

    This question must be examined not only under Turkish citizenship law but also under the nationality law of the person’s former country.

    Some investors relinquished their previous citizenship after acquiring Turkish citizenship, while others may have lost their former citizenship under the law of their country of origin.

    If Turkish citizenship is subsequently terminated, it is necessary to determine whether the person currently possesses another nationality.

    The possibility of statelessness may make the case more complex from the perspective of both immigration law and international law.

    36. IF MY TURKISH CITIZENSHIP IS TERMINATED, CAN I REMAIN IN TÜRKİYE?

    If citizenship ceases, the legal basis for the person’s continued presence in Türkiye must be examined separately.

    Relevant factors may include the person’s previous nationality, passport status, residence rights, family connections, employment, property ownership and other legal ties with Türkiye.

    The citizenship proceedings and immigration-law consequences should therefore be assessed together.

    37. CAN I SUE THE DEVELOPER OR INTERMEDIARY IF MY CITIZENSHIP IS CANCELLED?

    Depending on the circumstances, yes.

    If the seller, developer or intermediary expressly represented that the property qualified for Turkish citizenship, the investor relied upon that representation, and it later emerges that the property or supporting documents did not satisfy the relevant requirements, contractual and compensation claims may arise.

    A citizenship cancellation case and a private-law claim against the developer, seller, intermediary or other responsible party are separate proceedings.

    38. WHAT ARE THE MOST IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS IN A CITIZENSHIP REVOCATION CASE?

    A citizenship case should not be analysed solely by looking at the citizenship decision.

    The initial review may require, among other documents:

    citizenship acquisition documents and subsequent administrative decisions;

    Turkish identity and passport records;

    title deeds;

    real estate sale agreements;

    property valuation reports;

    the investment eligibility certificate;

    bank payment receipts;

    SWIFT records and account statements;

    foreign currency purchase or transfer documents;

    communications with the seller, developer or intermediaries;

    invoices and payment receipts;

    citizenship application documents;

    citizenship records of the spouse and children;

    and any document received from the police, public prosecutor or court.

    In many cases, a complete legal assessment cannot be made by examining only the title deed or only the valuation report.

    39. MY CITIZENSHIP HAS NOT BEEN CANCELLED, BUT MY PROJECT IS UNDER INVESTIGATION. WHAT SHOULD I DO NOW?

    Evidence should be preserved before any decision is issued.

    Old bank statements, SWIFT records, valuation reports, sale agreements, eligibility certificates and communications with the developer may become more difficult to obtain as time passes.

    A person who believes that a genuine investment was made should therefore consider creating a complete personal citizenship file in advance.

    Where appropriate, the historical market value of the property may also be examined before any litigation begins.

    40. I SAW MY NAME ON A SOCIAL-MEDIA LIST. DOES THAT MEAN MY CITIZENSHIP HAS BEEN CANCELLED?

    A social-media list does not, by itself, establish the person’s legal status.

    There is no publicly released official list containing the names of all 1,070 persons referred to in the investigation announced on 21 September 2026.

    A person should therefore not rely upon an unofficial internet list.

    The individual citizenship file and any criminal investigation should be checked through official channels.

    41. CAN I WIN A TURKISH CITIZENSHIP REVOCATION CASE?

    A reliable legal assessment cannot be made without reviewing the individual file.

    However, there can be substantial differences between cases.

    An investor who genuinely paid the full investment amount from his or her own funds, received no concealed refund, acquired the property through a real transaction, purchased a property whose actual value met the investment threshold applicable at the time, relied on the official valuation system, obtained an eligibility certificate, submitted no false documents and made no false declarations is not in the same legal position as a person alleged to have knowingly participated in a sham arrangement.

    The purpose of the legal defence should therefore not be limited to making a general statement of “good faith.”

    The investor’s own transaction, own money flow, own property and own conduct should be documented and analysed individually.

    42. HOW DO WE REVIEW A TURKISH CITIZENSHIP REVOCATION CASE?

    A proper citizenship review requires more than examining a single administrative decision.

    First, the date and legal basis on which citizenship was acquired must be established.

    The legislation applicable at the time of investment must then be identified.

    The title deed, sale agreement, valuation report, eligibility certificate and citizenship application documents should be examined.

    The genuine money flow from the investor’s source account to the seller should be reconstructed.

    It should be determined whether any part of the money returned directly or indirectly to the investor after the sale.

    Where necessary, the actual historical value of the property should be reassessed.

    If the developer, seller, valuation company or intermediary is involved in a criminal investigation, the investor’s individual position in that investigation should be determined.

    If the investor personally appears in a criminal investigation, the alleged offence and the evidence relating specifically to that investor should be examined.

    The status of the investment eligibility certificate and citizenship decision should then be established.

    Where a revocation or withdrawal decision exists, its legal basis, date, service and litigation deadline should be checked.

    For clients living abroad, possible risks relating to entry into Türkiye, criminal procedure and immigration law should also be assessed.

    Until this analysis has been completed, it is difficult to provide a reliable legal opinion on the appropriate litigation strategy or the legal position of the individual investor.

    CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION AND CITIZENSHIP PROCEEDINGS MAY NEED TO BE REVIEWED TOGETHER

    The files emerging in 2026 should no longer be viewed solely as conventional citizenship-law disputes.

    Current investigations may involve expert reports, MASAK financial analyses, banking records, title deed records, valuation reports and corporate relationships.

    For some investors, two separate questions therefore need to be answered:

    First:

    Does the person’s Turkish citizenship legally continue, and what administrative action has been taken in the citizenship file?

    Second:

    In the criminal investigation, is the person merely an investor whose transaction is being reviewed, a witness or person with information, an alleged victim, or a suspect?

    These are separate questions and neither can replace the other.

    SPECIAL WARNING FOR INVESTORS LIVING OUTSIDE TÜRKİYE

    The position may be particularly sensitive for investors who live abroad and have not travelled to Türkiye for several years.

    The individual may never have seen a notification.

    The Turkish telephone number previously used may no longer be active.

    The registered address may be outdated.

    The person may not have communicated with the developer or intermediary company for years.

    The person may have no knowledge of a criminal investigation.

    The person may not know that the citizenship file has been reopened for administrative review.

    In such circumstances, it may be appropriate to examine both the citizenship status and the criminal investigation before travelling to Türkiye.

    This is particularly important for persons who purchased real estate from projects, companies or intermediaries now appearing in current investigations.

    TD LAW FIRM – TURKISH CITIZENSHIP REVOCATION AND CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION FILE REVIEW

    TD Law Firm advises on matters involving revocation and withdrawal of Turkish citizenship acquired through investment, cancellation of investment eligibility certificates, allegations concerning false or inaccurate valuation reports, sham transactions and financial transfers, criminal investigations involving foreign investors and legal risks associated with entry into Türkiye.

    For clients living abroad, where legally possible, an initial review may be conducted to identify the relevant investigation and the immediate legal position before determining which documents or formal power of attorney arrangements are required for the next stage.

    For an initial assessment, it is useful to provide:

    the year in which Turkish citizenship was acquired;

    the project or company through which the investment was made;

    property information;

    any available citizenship documents;

    the valuation report;

    the investment eligibility certificate;

    and bank payment records.

    Av. Murat Can Dolğun
    Istanbul Bar Association – Registration No. 75860
    TD Law Firm

    Office: +90 212 299 44 22
    WhatsApp / Mobile: +90 507 475 44 22
    Email: av.muratcandolgun@gmail.com
    Website: dolgun.av.tr

    Address: Istanbul World Trade Center (IDTM), A2 Block, Floor 5, No. 206, Yeşilköy Mah., Atatürk Cad., Bakırköy / Istanbul, Türkiye

    OUR PREVIOUS ARTICLES

    19 September 2026

    “Revocation and Withdrawal of Turkish Citizenship Acquired Through Investment: False Valuation Reports, Sham Transactions, Good-Faith Investors and Judicial Protection.”

    This article examines in detail the distinction between Articles 31 and 40 of Turkish Citizenship Law, good-faith investors, retrospective property valuation, administrative stability, legal certainty and relevant Council of State case law.

    Available on dolgun.av.tr.

    26 September 2026

    “The 2026 Turkish Citizenship Cancellation Process Affecting 1,070 Persons.”

    This article examines the investigation announced on 21 September 2026, including 263 investors, 807 family members, 274 allegedly sham property sales, valuation issues and financial transactions.

    Available on dolgun.av.tr.

    LEGAL NOTICE

    This article has been prepared for general legal information purposes based on publicly available official announcements, legislation, accessible judicial decisions and publicly reported developments as of 28 September 2026.

    References to “false valuation reports,” “sham transactions,” “irregular citizenship,” “criminal organisation,” “fraud,” “forgery” or similar expressions in relation to ongoing criminal investigations refer to allegations and assessments publicly attributed to the investigating authorities.

    The existence of a criminal investigation, detention or remand decision does not constitute a final criminal conviction.

    The presumption of innocence applies unless and until a final judgment of conviction is rendered.

    The existence of a criminal investigation concerning a company, developer or valuation professional does not mean that every investor who dealt with that person or company is in the same legal position.

    Similarly, the fact that an investor is not a criminal suspect does not by itself establish that all objective statutory requirements for the acquisition of Turkish citizenship were satisfied.

    Every citizenship case should be examined individually by reference to the date of investment, the legislation applicable at that time, the genuine value of the property, financial transfers, the investor’s personal conduct, the investment eligibility certificate, the citizenship file, any related criminal investigation and the individual administrative decision issued in respect of the person concerned.

    This article does not constitute a guarantee of outcome or an individual legal opinion concerning any particular person or dispute.

  • 1,070 PEOPLE FACING TURKISH CITIZENSHIP CANCELLATION PROCEEDINGS IN 2026:A COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL GUIDE FOR REAL ESTATE INVESTORS

    1,070 PEOPLE FACING TURKISH CITIZENSHIP CANCELLATION PROCEEDINGS IN 2026:A COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL GUIDE FOR REAL ESTATE INVESTORS

    Updated: 26 September 2026

    INTRODUCTION: WE HAD ALREADY WARNED ABOUT THE DEVELOPING CITIZENSHIP CANCELLATION ISSUE

    On 19 September 2026, we published a detailed legal analysis concerning the cancellation and withdrawal of Turkish citizenship acquired through investment.

    In that article, we examined false or allegedly inflated property valuation reports, sham real estate transactions, the legal position of good-faith investors, the distinction between cancellation under Article 31 of Turkish Citizenship Law No. 5901 and withdrawal under Article 40, and the judicial remedies available against citizenship-related administrative decisions.

    Our previous detailed analysis is available here:

    Only two days after that publication, a major new development substantially expanded the scope of the issue.

    On 21 September 2026, Turkish authorities announced a new investigation concerning real estate transactions through which 1,070 persons were stated to have acquired Turkish citizenship.

    According to the Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office, the investigation concerns allegations including sham property sales, financial transactions that did not reflect genuine investment payments, and property valuation reports allegedly showing values substantially higher than the actual value of the properties.

    Source:
    Anadolu Agency, 21 September 2026
    https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/gundem/istanbul-merkezli-usulsuz-vatandaslik-operasyonunda-73-zanli-yakalandi/4062988

    For investors potentially affected by this investigation, the most important question is now:

    “If I am one of the 1,070 people identified in this investigation, has my Turkish citizenship already been cancelled?”

    The answer requires a careful legal distinction.

    The public announcement did not state that all 1,070 persons had already received final individual decisions cancelling their Turkish citizenship.

    The Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office stated that the necessary administrative process had been initiated for the cancellation of citizenship considered to have been acquired irregularly.

    Source:
    https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/gundem/istanbul-merkezli-usulsuz-vatandaslik-operasyonunda-73-zanli-yakalandi/4062988

    This wording is legally significant.

    Being identified within a criminal investigation, being subjected to an administrative review, having an investment conformity determination reconsidered, receiving an individual administrative decision concerning citizenship, and challenging that decision before the administrative courts are separate legal stages.

    Accordingly, an investor who has been told that he or she is “among the 1,070 people” should not determine his or her legal status solely from general news reports.

    The individual citizenship file must be examined.

    I. WHAT EXACTLY IS THE 1,070-PERSON TURKISH CITIZENSHIP INVESTIGATION?

    The investigation is being conducted by the Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office.

    According to the official information reported by Anadolu Agency, the authorities evaluated Land Registry and Cadastre records, expert reports, MASAK financial analyses and other documents together.

    The Prosecutor’s Office stated that, in certain transactions:

    • the foreign currency required for Turkish citizenship had allegedly not genuinely entered Türkiye;
    • purchase and sale transactions had allegedly been structured using the financial resources of intermediary companies or sellers;
    • sham or collusive property transactions had allegedly been created;
    • and artificially high valuation reports had allegedly been prepared in relation to certain properties.

    Source:
    https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/gundem/istanbul-merkezli-usulsuz-vatandaslik-operasyonunda-73-zanli-yakalandi/4062988

    According to the same official statement, transactions totalling approximately USD 72.25 million were considered to have been carried out on a sham or collusive basis.

    The Minister of Justice also referred to transactions exceeding TRY 3.5 billion in the second phase of the investigation.

    Source:
    https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/gundem/istanbul-merkezli-usulsuz-vatandaslik-operasyonunda-73-zanli-yakalandi/4062988

    This demonstrates an important point:

    The current investigation is not limited to the question of whether a valuation report was accurate.

    For an affected investor, the legal review may require examination of:

    the title deed,

    the purchase agreement,

    the valuation report,

    the Certificate of Conformity,

    bank statements,

    SWIFT records,

    the source of the investment funds,

    the amount actually received by the seller,

    any subsequent repayment of funds,

    and the complete citizenship application file.

    The real economic and legal substance of each individual investment is therefore critical.

    II. THE 1,070 PEOPLE ARE NOT 1,070 PRINCIPAL INVESTORS

    One of the most important facts disclosed by the authorities concerns the composition of the 1,070-person group.

    According to the information released by the Ministry of Interior and reported by Anadolu Agency:

    263 persons are principal investors.

    807 persons are family members.

    This gives a total of 1,070 persons.

    The authorities further stated that 1,015 persons acquired Turkish citizenship at the time of the original citizenship decision, while 55 children acquired Turkish citizenship after that decision.

    Source:
    https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/gundem/istanbul-merkezli-usulsuz-vatandaslik-operasyonunda-73-zanli-yakalandi/4062988

    Accordingly, it would be inaccurate to describe the matter as involving “1,070 investors”.

    It concerns 263 principal investors together with 807 family members.

    This distinction has substantial legal importance because the status of the principal investor and the citizenship status of a spouse or child may require separate examination.

    III. HAS THE TURKISH CITIZENSHIP OF ALL 1,070 PEOPLE ALREADY BEEN CANCELLED?

    Based on the official information currently available, it would not be accurate to state that all 1,070 persons have already received final individual cancellation decisions.

    The wording publicly used by the authorities is that:

    the necessary administrative process for the cancellation of citizenship has been initiated.

    Source:
    https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/gundem/istanbul-merkezli-usulsuz-vatandaslik-operasyonunda-73-zanli-yakalandi/4062988

    This distinction should not be treated as a technicality.

    There may be several separate stages:

    1. Identification in the investigation.
    2. Administrative examination of the investment.
    3. Examination of the Certificate of Conformity.
    4. Examination of the citizenship file.
    5. Issuance of an individual administrative decision.
    6. Notification of that decision.
    7. Judicial review before the competent administrative court.

    Accordingly, a person who believes that he or she falls within the 1,070-person group should first determine the exact current stage of the individual file.

    IV. IS THERE AN OFFICIAL PUBLIC LIST OF THE 1,070 PEOPLE?

    This point requires particular caution.

    Various lists are currently circulating on social media and through private messaging groups, and some of these documents are being presented as lists of persons allegedly included in the 1,070-person investigation.

    However, in the official public statements referred to in this article, the authorities have not published a complete list containing the names of all 1,070 persons.

    The official announcements disclose the number of affected persons, the number of principal investors and family members, and general information concerning the investigation.

    They do not publish a complete official name list.

    Official source:
    https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/gundem/istanbul-merkezli-usulsuz-vatandaslik-operasyonunda-73-zanli-yakalandi/4062988

    Accordingly, lists circulating on social media should NOT be treated as an official confirmation that a particular person is or is not included in the investigation.

    The accuracy, completeness and source of such lists are not presently confirmed by the official announcements cited in this article.

    They may contain incomplete information, outdated information, spelling differences, duplicated names or persons who are not actually subject to an individual citizenship measure.

    For this reason, the existence of a person’s name on a social media list should be treated only as information requiring verification.

    Likewise, the absence of a name from an unofficial list does not prove that the person is outside the scope of the administrative investigation.

    The correct approach is to verify the individual’s position through official citizenship records, the relevant administrative file and, where necessary, the underlying investigation records.

    In short:

    A social media list is not an administrative decision.

    It is not an official citizenship record.

    It is not proof that citizenship has been cancelled.

    Each case must be verified individually.

    V. WHY THE ACTUAL BANK PAYMENT MAY BE ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUES

    One of the central allegations in the investigation concerns the reality of the investment payments.

    According to the Prosecutor’s Office, in certain transactions the required foreign currency allegedly did not genuinely enter Türkiye, and financial arrangements were allegedly created using resources belonging to sellers or intermediary entities.

    Source:
    https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/gundem/istanbul-merkezli-usulsuz-vatandaslik-operasyonunda-73-zanli-yakalandi/4062988

    This makes the actual movement of funds extremely important.

    A genuine investor may have:

    paid the full purchase price from his or her own bank account;

    used genuine personal or commercial funds;

    transferred the funds directly to the seller;

    received no undisclosed refund;

    genuinely acquired the property;

    and had no knowledge of or involvement in any allegedly irregular structure.

    That factual situation is materially different from a transaction in which the required investment capital was only made to appear to originate from the investor.

    Therefore, the analysis should not normally stop with one bank transfer receipt.

    The entire transaction may need to be reconstructed:

    source of funds
    → investor’s bank account
    → transfer to seller
    → receipt by seller
    → subsequent movement of funds.

    Complete bank statements, SWIFT documents and evidence of the source of funds may become highly important evidence.

    VI. “I DID NOT PREPARE THE VALUATION REPORT”

    This issue may be particularly important where Article 31 of Turkish Citizenship Law No. 5901 is relied upon.

    Article 31 concerns cancellation of the decision granting Turkish citizenship where citizenship was acquired as a result of a false statement by the person concerned or the concealment of material matters forming the basis of the acquisition.

    The Directorate General of Population and Citizenship Affairs similarly explains that an investigation is conducted and that citizenship may be cancelled where concealment of matters forming the basis of the acquisition is clearly established.

    Official source:
    T.C. Ministry of Interior
    Directorate General of Population and Citizenship Affairs
    https://www.nvi.gov.tr/kurumlar/nvi.gov.tr/mevzuat/nufusmevzuat/genelge/5901Sayili_Turk_Vatandasligi_Kanuna_Gore_Aciklama2009.pdf

    This distinction matters.

    An allegation that a valuation expert prepared a false or inaccurate valuation report does not, by itself, establish that the investor knew the report was false.

    Likewise, an allegation concerning acts by a seller, intermediary or third party does not, without further evidence, establish that every investor knowingly participated in those acts.

    Where Article 31 is relied upon, the following questions may therefore become important:

    What false statement did the investor personally make?

    What material fact did the investor conceal?

    Did the investor know that the valuation was allegedly inaccurate?

    Did the investor request that the stated value be increased?

    Did the investor receive any undisclosed return of the purchase price?

    Did the investor submit any document knowing that it was false?

    These questions concern the individual investor’s conduct.

    VII. GOOD FAITH IS IMPORTANT — BUT IT MAY NOT ANSWER EVERY LEGAL QUESTION

    A different legal issue arises under Article 40 of Turkish Citizenship Law No. 5901.

    Article 31 and Article 40 should not be treated as interchangeable provisions.

    Article 31 is primarily concerned with false statements or concealment attributable to the person concerned.

    Article 40 concerns the withdrawal of a citizenship decision where it is subsequently determined that the legal conditions for the decision were not satisfied.

    An investor may therefore have acted entirely in good faith.

    The investor may never have met the valuation expert.

    The investor may have relied upon the developer, advisers and official administrative documents.

    There may nevertheless be a separate legal question:

    Did the property genuinely satisfy the statutory investment requirement applicable at the relevant time?

    Accordingly, a complete defence should generally address two separate questions:

    1. Did the investor personally participate in any false statement, concealment or irregularity?
    2. Were the objective legal conditions for the acquisition of Turkish citizenship actually satisfied?

    We discussed the distinction between cancellation under Article 31 and withdrawal under Article 40 in greater detail in our previous article:

    VIII. THE HISTORICAL VALUE OF THE PROPERTY MAY BE CRITICAL

    Where the original valuation report is challenged, the relevant question is not necessarily:

    “What is this property worth today?”

    The relevant question may instead be:

    “What was the true market value of this property on the relevant investment date?”

    This distinction can be decisive.

    An allegedly inaccurate valuation report does not necessarily mean that the property itself was below the statutory investment threshold.

    A retrospective valuation may therefore become necessary.

    Such an assessment may consider:

    historical comparable sales;

    other units sold in the same development;

    floor area;

    floor level;

    location;

    view;

    state of completion;

    historical exchange rates;

    Land Registry data;

    and market conditions prevailing on the relevant date.

    The investment should be assessed under the factual conditions existing when it was made.

    IX. THE CURRENT USD 400,000 THRESHOLD SHOULD NOT SIMPLY BE APPLIED TO HISTORICAL INVESTMENTS

    The real estate investment threshold for Turkish citizenship has changed over time.

    Accordingly, an investment made under an earlier legal regime must be assessed under the rules applicable to that investment at the relevant time.

    The current USD 400,000 requirement should not simply be applied retrospectively to every historical citizenship file.

    The following dates may therefore be important:

    the property purchase date;

    the payment date;

    the valuation report date;

    the Certificate of Conformity date;

    the citizenship application date;

    and the citizenship decision date.

    The applicable legislation must then be determined according to the chronology of the individual case.

    X. WHY THE CERTIFICATE OF CONFORMITY MATTERS

    Citizenship by investment is not based solely upon a private declaration by the investor.

    The investment must pass through administrative procedures and the relevant competent authority issues a Certificate of Conformity where the statutory investment requirements are considered satisfied.

    The Directorate General of Population and Citizenship Affairs expressly regulates the role of the conformity determination in exceptional citizenship applications made by foreign investors.

    Official source:
    https://nvi.gov.tr/kurumlar/nvi.gov.tr/mevzuat/nufusmevzuat/talimat/yabanci-yatirimcilarin-istisnai-olarak-turk-vatandasligini-kazanmalarina-iliskin-usul-ve-esaslar.pdf

    The existence of a Certificate of Conformity does not necessarily mean that the citizenship decision can never subsequently be reviewed.

    However, it is legally significant that the investment was previously examined within an official administrative process.

    A later review must therefore consider both:

    the new evidence now relied upon by the authorities;

    and the earlier administrative determinations on which the investor relied.

    XI. FAMILY MEMBERS: WHAT HAPPENS TO SPOUSES AND CHILDREN?

    This question is particularly important because 807 of the 1,070 persons identified by the authorities are family members.

    Source:
    https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/gundem/istanbul-merkezli-usulsuz-vatandaslik-operasyonunda-73-zanli-yakalandi/4062988

    Under Turkish citizenship legislation, cancellation of a citizenship acquisition decision may also have consequences for spouses and children who acquired citizenship in connection with the principal applicant.

    The official guidance issued by the Directorate General of Population and Citizenship Affairs addresses the effects of cancellation upon persons who acquired citizenship through the person concerned.

    Official source:
    https://www.nvi.gov.tr/kurumlar/nvi.gov.tr/mevzuat/nufusmevzuat/genelge/5901Sayili_Turk_Vatandasligi_Kanuna_Gore_Aciklama2009.pdf

    However, each family member’s citizenship history should still be examined.

    This is particularly important because the Ministry stated that 55 children within the relevant group acquired citizenship after the original citizenship decision.

    Therefore, the precise date and legal basis on which each spouse or child became a Turkish citizen should be established individually.

    XII. WHAT HAPPENED AFTER THE 21 SEPTEMBER OPERATION?

    The criminal investigation remains active.

    On 25 September 2026, Anadolu Agency reported that judicial procedures concerning 74 detained suspects had been completed.

    Thirty-three suspects were remanded in custody.

    Twenty suspects were subjected to a judicial-control measure requiring them not to leave their residence.

    Source:
    Anadolu Agency, 25 September 2026
    https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/gundem/istanbul-merkezli-usulsuz-vatandaslik-operasyonunda-yakalanan-33-supheli-tutuklandi/4068739

    These are criminal-procedure measures.

    A remand decision is not a final criminal conviction.

    Likewise, criminal proceedings involving sellers, intermediaries, valuation professionals or other suspects are legally distinct from an administrative determination concerning the citizenship status of an individual investor.

    Evidence from the criminal investigation may be relevant to the citizenship proceedings.

    However, the legal position of each investor must still be individually assessed.

    XIII. ASSET MEASURES DO NOT MEAN THAT EVERY INVESTOR’S PROPERTY HAS BEEN SEIZED

    The authorities announced measures involving:

    2,011 properties;

    one hotel;

    86 motor vehicles;

    two yachts;

    42 bank accounts;

    and 30 companies.

    Source:
    https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/gundem/istanbul-merkezli-usulsuz-vatandaslik-operasyonunda-73-zanli-yakalandi/4062988

    These figures should not be misunderstood.

    They do not establish that the property of every person within the 1,070-person group has been seized.

    Whether a particular investor’s property is subject to a restriction, seizure, annotation or another measure must be checked through that person’s own official records.

    A criminal asset-protection measure and an administrative citizenship decision are separate legal matters.

    XIV. WHAT SHOULD AN INVESTOR DO IF HE OR SHE MAY BE AMONG THE 1,070 PEOPLE?

    The first task should be to establish the exact legal and administrative status of the individual case.

    Questions to be answered include:

    Am I actually included in the relevant investigation?

    Is my citizenship file merely under examination?

    Has any action been taken concerning my Certificate of Conformity?

    Has an individual citizenship decision been issued?

    If so, what is its legal basis?

    Has the decision been formally notified to me?

    What specific transaction or document is the administration relying upon?

    Was my payment genuine and traceable?

    Did my property satisfy the required investment value at the relevant historical date?

    Was I personally involved in any alleged valuation or financial irregularity?

    What is the separate citizenship status of my spouse and children?

    XV. DOCUMENTS THAT SHOULD BE PRESERVED AND REVIEWED

    Potentially affected investors should consider assembling the complete investment and citizenship record.

    Important documents may include:

    title deed records;

    property sale contracts;

    valuation reports;

    Certificate of Conformity;

    bank transfer receipts;

    complete bank account statements;

    SWIFT records;

    foreign exchange documents;

    invoices;

    proof of source of funds;

    communications with sellers or intermediaries;

    citizenship application documents;

    the citizenship decision;

    and citizenship records relating to spouses and children.

    Particular attention should be given to historical banking records because such documents can become more difficult to obtain with the passage of time.

    XVI. WHAT IF THE INVESTOR IS CURRENTLY OUTSIDE TÜRKİYE?

    A citizenship review should not automatically be equated with a criminal restriction on travel.

    Being identified within a citizenship-related investigation does not, by itself, establish the existence of:

    an arrest warrant;

    a detention order;

    a judicial-control measure;

    or another individual criminal restriction.

    Accordingly, an investor abroad should not assess the risks of travelling to Türkiye solely on the basis of having been told that he or she is “one of the 1,070”.

    The following matters should be separately verified:

    current citizenship status;

    any individual administrative citizenship decision;

    any criminal investigation concerning the investor;

    any arrest or judicial restriction;

    and the immigration consequences if Turkish citizenship has already been affected.

    XVII. CAN A CITIZENSHIP CANCELLATION OR WITHDRAWAL DECISION BE CHALLENGED?

    Yes.

    A citizenship cancellation or withdrawal decision constitutes an administrative act and is subject to judicial review under Turkish administrative law.

    The precise legal remedy, competent court, time limit and any application for a stay of execution must be assessed according to the individual decision and the authority that issued it.

    This is another reason why the legal basis of the decision must first be established.

    A decision based on Article 31 and a decision based on Article 40 raise different legal questions.

    They should not simply be described by the single English word “revocation” without identifying the Turkish-law mechanism actually being used.

    XVIII. THE CENTRAL QUESTION FOR THE 1,070 PEOPLE

    The central legal question is not merely:

    “Was there irregularity somewhere within the wider transaction structure?”

    The relevant questions are individual:

    Was this investor’s payment genuine?

    Where did the money originate?

    Did the seller actually receive the money?

    Was any amount returned?

    What was the property’s true value at the relevant historical date?

    Did the investor know about any alleged valuation irregularity?

    Did the investor make a false statement?

    Did the investor conceal any material fact?

    Were the objective statutory investment conditions actually satisfied?

    What did the competent public authorities determine when the Certificate of Conformity was originally issued?

    What new evidence is now relied upon to alter the earlier administrative position?

    CONCLUSION: “1,070 PEOPLE” DOES NOT MEAN 1,070 IDENTICAL CASES

    The investigation announced on 21 September 2026 is one of the most significant recent developments concerning Turkish citizenship acquired through real estate investment.

    According to the information released by the authorities, the relevant group consists of:

    263 principal investors;

    807 family members;

    1,070 persons in total.

    Source:
    https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/gundem/istanbul-merkezli-usulsuz-vatandaslik-operasyonunda-73-zanli-yakalandi/4062988

    However, a large-scale investigation does not transform hundreds of separate investments into one single legal case.

    Each investor’s position must be examined individually.

    The analysis should include:

    the legislation applicable on the investment date;

    the genuine movement of funds;

    the historical value of the property;

    the valuation report;

    the Certificate of Conformity;

    the investor’s own declarations and conduct;

    any alleged return or circular movement of funds;

    the legal position of spouses and children;

    and the precise factual and statutory grounds relied upon by the administration.

    The existence of an investigation involving third parties does not, by itself, determine whether a particular investor acquired Turkish citizenship unlawfully.

    Equally, good faith alone may not resolve every possible issue where the authorities allege that an objective statutory investment requirement was not satisfied.

    The correct legal method is therefore to reconstruct the individual investment and citizenship file, determine the statutory basis relied upon by the administration and test the allegations against the investor’s actual documents.

    For our earlier comprehensive legal analysis concerning Turkish citizenship acquired by investment, cancellation, withdrawal, alleged false valuation reports, sham transactions and good-faith investors, see:

    TD LAW FIRM

    TD Law Firm advises and represents foreign investors in matters concerning Turkish citizenship by investment, administrative review of citizenship files, cancellation and withdrawal proceedings, Certificate of Conformity disputes, real estate valuation issues, alleged sham transactions and related administrative litigation.

    In cases potentially connected with the 1,070-person investigation announced on 21 September 2026, the legal assessment should be based on the investor’s individual citizenship, property, valuation and banking records rather than general media reports or unverified lists circulating on social media.

    Av. Murat Can Dolğun
    Istanbul Bar Association – Registration No. 75860

    TD Law Firm

    Tel: +90 212 299 44 22
    WhatsApp: +90 507 475 44 22
    E-mail: av.muratcandolgun@gmail.com
    Website: https://dolgun.av.tr

    Address:
    Istanbul World Trade Center (İDTM)
    A2 Block, No: 206
    Bakırköy / Istanbul, Türkiye

    LEGAL NOTICE

    This article is provided for general legal information only and does not constitute individual legal advice or a guarantee of any particular outcome.

    The legal position of each investor must be assessed by reference to the individual administrative file, investment documents, banking records, citizenship records and the legislation applicable at the relevant time.

    In particular, names appearing on lists circulated through social media, messaging applications or other unofficial channels should not be regarded as official confirmation of inclusion in the 1,070-person investigation unless and until the individual position is verified through official records.

    SOURCES

    1. Anadolu Agency – 21 September 2026
      Istanbul-centred investigation concerning allegedly irregular acquisition of Turkish citizenship:
      https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/gundem/istanbul-merkezli-usulsuz-vatandaslik-operasyonunda-73-zanli-yakalandi/4062988
    2. Anadolu Agency – 25 September 2026
      33 suspects remanded in custody:
      https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/gundem/istanbul-merkezli-usulsuz-vatandaslik-operasyonunda-yakalanan-33-supheli-tutuklandi/4068739
    3. T.C. Ministry of Interior – Directorate General of Population and Citizenship Affairs
      Official guidance concerning Turkish Citizenship Law No. 5901:
      https://www.nvi.gov.tr/kurumlar/nvi.gov.tr/mevzuat/nufusmevzuat/genelge/5901Sayili_Turk_Vatandasligi_Kanuna_Gore_Aciklama2009.pdf
    4. T.C. Ministry of Interior – Directorate General of Population and Citizenship Affairs
      Procedures and Principles Regarding Exceptional Acquisition of Turkish Citizenship by Foreign Investors:
      https://nvi.gov.tr/kurumlar/nvi.gov.tr/mevzuat/nufusmevzuat/talimat/yabanci-yatirimcilarin-istisnai-olarak-turk-vatandasligini-kazanmalarina-iliskin-usul-ve-esaslar.pdf
    5. Previous detailed legal analysis – Av. Murat Can Dolğun
      https://dolgun.av.tr/2026/09/19/yatirim-yoluyla-turk-vatandasliginin-iptali-geri-alinmasi/