Etiket: Citizenship by Investment Turkey

  • Military Service in Türkiye 2026: Fees, Exemptions & Citizenship

    Military Service in Türkiye 2026: Fees, Exemptions & Citizenship

    DOLĞUN AKADEMİ | MILITARY SERVICE LAW | 2026

    Military Service in Türkiye 2026: Types of Military Service, Paid Military Service Fees, Foreign Currency Military Service, Exemptions, and the Rights of Newly Naturalized Turkish Citizens

    Author: Attorney Murat Can Dolğun
    Publication: Dolğun Akademi – TD Law Firm
    Practice Areas: Administrative Law, Constitutional Law, Military Service Law, Turkish Citizenship Law, Immigration Law, and Human Rights Law
    Last Updated: October 23, 2026

    ABSTRACT

    Military service in Türkiye is a constitutional public obligation governed primarily by Article 72 of the Constitution of the Republic of Türkiye and Military Recruitment Law No. 7179. However, the obligation to perform military service does not apply identically to every Turkish citizen. A person’s age, medical condition, educational background, nationality status, residence abroad, previous military service, and the legal method through which Turkish citizenship was acquired may substantially affect the existence, duration, and manner of fulfilling this obligation.

    The year 2026 has been particularly significant for the Turkish military service system because of legislative amendments affecting paid military service fees. Through Law No. 7577, published in the Official Gazette on April 17, 2026, the statutory coefficient used to calculate the paid military service fee was increased from 240,000 to 300,000. Following the adjustment of the civil servant monthly salary coefficient in July 2026, the paid military service fee for the second half of the year was established at TRY 472,653.60.

    Nevertheless, Turkish military service law encompasses far more than the payment of a fee. The existing legal framework provides for six months of compulsory service as a private or non-commissioned enlisted soldier, twelve months of service as a reserve officer or reserve non-commissioned officer, paid military service, foreign currency military service, educational and overseas deferments, medical exemptions, and various circumstances in which military service is legally considered to have been completed.

    One of the most important subjects examined in this article concerns foreign nationals who subsequently acquire Turkish citizenship. In particular, male individuals who become Turkish citizens through real estate investment, exceptional naturalization, or ordinary naturalization procedures may benefit from specific exemptions or deferments under Article 43 of Military Recruitment Law No. 7179.

    This study also addresses the legal position of dual nationals, recognition of military service performed in foreign countries, the consequences of annulment or loss of Turkish citizenship, military service obligations following reacquisition of citizenship, failure to undergo military registration, failure to report for military service, administrative fines, medical assessments, administrative appeals, judicial review, and the protection of fundamental rights.

    The purpose of this article is not merely to explain military service procedures. It is to provide a comprehensive legal analysis of how military service obligations arise, how they may be postponed or discharged, and which legal remedies are available when administrative authorities incorrectly determine an individual’s military status.

    I. CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL FOUNDATIONS OF MILITARY SERVICE IN TÜRKİYE

    Article 72 of the Constitution of the Republic of Türkiye establishes national service as both a right and a duty of every Turkish citizen. The same constitutional provision states that the manner in which national service shall be performed, or deemed to have been performed, either within the Armed Forces or in the public sector, shall be regulated by law.

    This constitutional provision establishes three fundamental principles governing military service obligations.

    First, military service is a public law obligation. Administrative decisions concerning military registration, classification, deferment, exemption, and deployment derive their legal authority from legislation rather than from private contractual relationships.

    Second, the scope and conditions of military service must be determined by legislation. Although the Constitution establishes national service as a general constitutional duty, it does not directly identify every category of persons required to perform military service or every individual entitled to exemption.

    Third, administrative decisions concerning military service remain subject to the rule of law and judicial review. Article 125 of the Constitution establishes the principle that administrative acts and decisions are subject to judicial review, subject to constitutionally recognized exceptions.

    Under Article 2 of Military Recruitment Law No. 7179, the legislation applies to male citizens of the Republic of Türkiye. Therefore, the general constitutional concept of national service must be distinguished from the personal scope of compulsory military service under existing statutory law.

    Women are not subject to the same general compulsory military service obligation applicable to men. However, women may serve in the Turkish Armed Forces as professional military personnel under the applicable recruitment and employment regulations.

    The general statutory military service age also requires clarification. Under Law No. 7179, military age begins on January 1 of the calendar year in which a male citizen turns 20 and ends on January 1 of the year in which he turns 41.

    Nevertheless, reaching the end of the statutory military service age does not necessarily eliminate every legal consequence arising from previous administrative violations or criminal proceedings.

    II. WHAT TYPES OF MILITARY SERVICE EXIST IN TÜRKİYE IN 2026?

    The modern Turkish military service framework was substantially reorganized through Military Recruitment Law No. 7179, which entered into force in 2019.

    The duration and legal characteristics of military service depend on the individual’s classification and applicable statutory conditions.

    Type of Service Duration Financial Conditions in 2026
    Regular enlisted military service 6 months No paid military service fee
    Reserve officer service 12 months Remuneration and benefits under applicable law
    Reserve non-commissioned officer service 12 months Remuneration and benefits under applicable law
    Paid military service 1 month TRY 472,653.60
    Foreign currency military service Distance education; no compulsory in-person basic training Foreign currency equivalent of TRY 472,653.60
    Voluntary additional six-month service Additional 6 months Allowance of at least the net minimum wage

    The table identifies the principal methods of performing military service. Other legal mechanisms include exemptions based on medical conditions, military service deemed completed following naturalization, and special exemptions prescribed by law.

    Such exemptions must not be confused with independent categories of military service. They concern circumstances in which the obligation does not arise, is discharged by operation of law, or is legally regarded as satisfied.

    Professional military careers, including commissioned officers, non-commissioned officers, specialist enlisted personnel, and contracted military personnel, are subject to separate rules concerning recruitment, employment, contractual obligations, and service benefits.

    III. HOW MUCH IS THE PAID MILITARY SERVICE FEE IN TÜRKİYE IN 2026?

    The paid military service fee applicable between July 1 and December 31, 2026, is TRY 472,653.60.

    This amount was officially announced by the Turkish Ministry of National Defence on July 7, 2026.

    3.1. How is the paid military service fee calculated?

    Under Article 9 of Military Recruitment Law No. 7179, the fee is calculated by multiplying the statutory indicator by the civil servant monthly salary coefficient applicable on the date of payment.

    For the second half of 2026, the calculation is as follows:

    300,000 × 1.575512 = TRY 472,653.60

    The Ministry of Treasury and Finance established the relevant monthly coefficient as 1.575512 through its circular dated July 3, 2026.

    3.2. What changed in April 2026?

    Law No. 7577, adopted on April 2, 2026, and published in Official Gazette No. 33227 on April 17, 2026, amended the statutory calculation method.

    Article 12 of that legislation increased the indicator used to determine the paid military service fee from 240,000 to 300,000.

    This constituted a 25% increase in the statutory indicator.

    Following the amendment, the Ministry of National Defence announced the April 2026 fee as TRY 416,361.30. The amount subsequently increased to TRY 472,653.60 in July following the adjustment of the civil servant salary coefficient.

    The legislative amendment also addressed the allocation of revenues collected through paid military service, including arrangements concerning the central budget and the Defence Industry Support Fund.

    Accordingly, the increase in paid military service fees during 2026 should not be attributed exclusively to ordinary salary coefficient adjustments. It resulted from the combination of a statutory legislative amendment and a subsequent coefficient adjustment.

    3.3. How much will paid military service cost in 2027?

    As of October 23, 2026, this study does not adopt any definitive paid military service amount for 2027.

    Under the existing legal framework, the amount is linked to the applicable civil servant monthly salary coefficient and is therefore subject to further adjustment.

    Any exact prediction concerning future fees must be distinguished from an officially determined amount.

    Applicants should also understand that the amount payable is linked to the legally applicable rate on the date of payment, rather than merely the date of submitting an application.

    IV. WHO CAN APPLY FOR PAID MILITARY SERVICE?

    Paid military service, commonly referred to in Turkish as bedelli askerlik, is available to eligible male Turkish citizens who satisfy the requirements established by Law No. 7179 and the Military Recruitment Regulation.

    Applicants must generally have entered military service age, must not have commenced actual military service, and must meet the applicable administrative and medical conditions.

    There is no general upper age limit for paid military service. However, the individual’s status as a person legally subject to military service must first be established.

    Applicants who have not completed their military registration and medical examination procedures must complete the necessary formalities before their applications can be properly processed.

    Individuals legally determined to be medically unfit for military service should not be required to pay a fee merely to obtain an exemption to which they are already entitled.

    4.1. Where can an application be submitted?

    Depending on the applicant’s circumstances, applications may be submitted through the Turkish e-Government system or at a military recruitment office.

    However, persons classified as draft evaders, unregistered military-age persons, or individuals who have failed to report for military service may be subject to a different procedure and may be required to apply directly to a military recruitment office.

    4.2. What is the payment deadline?

    As a general rule, the applicable paid military service fee must be paid within two months following the application date.

    Payment is made in a single installment. The statutory paid military service system does not provide an ordinary installment payment arrangement.

    Particular caution is required where an applicant has previously been classified as a draft evader or has failed to report for service.

    Failure to pay within the prescribed period may affect the person’s ability to benefit from paid military service in the future, depending on the relevant statutory restrictions and the applicant’s history.

    4.3. Is attendance at a military training facility compulsory?

    Yes. Payment of the fee alone does not ordinarily complete paid military service.

    Applicants must generally participate in one month of basic military training.

    Therefore, payment of the fee and the legal completion of military service are distinct stages.

    4.4. Can an applicant withdraw from paid military service?

    Withdrawal may be possible at certain stages of the application process.

    However, withdrawal after obtaining a place through classification or selection procedures may have consequences for the individual’s ability to apply again.

    For this reason, applicants should assess the refund rules, classification timetable, training dates, and possible consequences of withdrawal before making a final decision.

    V. FOREIGN CURRENCY MILITARY SERVICE: REQUIREMENTS, FEES, AND THE 1,095-DAY RULE

    Foreign currency military service, known in Turkish as dövizle askerlik, is a special mechanism available to certain Turkish citizens residing abroad.

    Although the financial calculation is connected to paid military service, the two systems are legally distinct.

    They differ in eligibility requirements, residence and employment conditions, and obligations concerning military training.

    5.1. Foreign currency military service fee in 2026

    For the second half of 2026, the underlying Turkish lira amount is TRY 472,653.60.

    The foreign currency equivalent is calculated using the applicable foreign exchange buying rate of the Central Bank of the Republic of Türkiye on the payment date.

    Consequently, there is no single fixed euro amount applicable throughout the entire year.

    For illustration only, if the applicable buying rate were TRY 50 per euro, the corresponding amount would be approximately EUR 9,453.07.

    This figure is an illustrative calculation and must not be interpreted as the actual exchange rate or an officially announced euro-denominated fee.

    5.2. The 1,095-day residence or employment requirement

    Eligible applicants generally must demonstrate at least three years, equivalent to 1,095 days, of qualifying residence or employment abroad under the statutory conditions.

    For individuals working abroad as employees, employers, or members of a profession or trade, employment and residence authorizations, contracts, and actual periods of work may be relevant.

    Different provisions may apply to persons working as seafarers aboard foreign-flagged vessels.

    For certain multiple nationals and individuals born and residing abroad who hold indefinite residence permits, the legislation may permit the relevant period of residence to be assessed without the ordinary employment requirement.

    Periods physically spent in Türkiye may have to be deducted from the qualifying period.

    In suitable circumstances, periods of employment in different countries may be combined, provided that the applicable legal conditions are satisfied and the relevant documentation is submitted.

    5.3. Must applicants travel to Türkiye for military training?

    No. Under the current foreign currency military service framework, eligible applicants are not generally required to travel to Türkiye to complete one month of physical basic military training.

    Instead, they must complete the distance education program established by the Ministry of National Defence.

    The official distance education portal is available at:

    https://dovizle.msb.gov.tr/

    It is important to distinguish completion of the online training program from final approval of the foreign currency military service application.

    Consular procedures, examination of supporting documents, confirmation of eligibility, and completion of payment obligations remain separate administrative stages.

    5.4. Is there an age limit?

    The former age limit of 38 for foreign currency military service has been abolished.

    Nevertheless, removal of that restriction does not create an unconditional right to complete military service through payment alone.

    Applicants must continue to satisfy the relevant statutory conditions.

    5.5. Important considerations for Turkish citizens living abroad

    Living outside Türkiye does not automatically establish eligibility for foreign currency military service.

    Applicants must examine the legal basis of their residence, employment status, actual time spent abroad, travel history, and consular records.

    Special restrictions may also apply to individuals who receive remuneration from Türkiye, work abroad in certain official capacities, or lack the relevant qualifying employment status.

    VI. REGULAR MILITARY SERVICE, RESERVE OFFICERS, AND RESERVE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICERS

    6.1. Six-month military service

    Under the present legal system, the standard period of compulsory military service for enlisted personnel is six months.

    Not every individual subject to military service must choose the paid military service option.

    Where the statutory requirements are satisfied, the military obligation may be discharged by completing ordinary military service.

    6.2. Reserve officer service

    Reserve officer service lasts twelve months.

    Eligibility and classification depend on factors such as educational qualifications, personnel requirements of the Turkish Armed Forces, and the relevant military classification procedures.

    An applicant’s personal preference to serve as a reserve officer does not automatically entitle the applicant to that classification.

    6.3. Reserve non-commissioned officer service

    Reserve non-commissioned officer service also lasts twelve months.

    This category is particularly relevant to individuals holding qualifying higher education degrees.

    However, the applicant’s degree alone does not conclusively determine military classification.

    6.4. Comparing different military service categories

    The legal and financial consequences of regular enlisted service, reserve officer service, and reserve non-commissioned officer service are not identical.

    They differ in duration, duties, responsibilities, remuneration, and service conditions.

    Accordingly, the choice or preference expressed by an eligible applicant should be assessed in light of educational qualifications, professional circumstances, and individual requirements.

    VII. VOLUNTARY ADDITIONAL SIX-MONTH MILITARY SERVICE

    Individuals who complete their initial six-month military service as enlisted personnel may, subject to the applicable conditions, apply to continue their service for an additional six months.

    Approval depends on matters including the evaluation of the applicant by military superiors and the relevant personnel requirements.

    When approved, the total military service period becomes twelve months.

    Individuals serving during the voluntary additional period receive an allowance that must not be lower than the applicable net minimum wage, subject to the statutory framework.

    Participation is not compulsory and must not be confused with an automatic entitlement to continued military employment.

    The relevant legislation also provides certain benefits concerning subsequent military personnel recruitment and social security arrangements.

    The scope and application of these benefits depend on the special rules governing each procedure.

    VIII. MUST NEWLY NATURALIZED TURKISH CITIZENS PERFORM MILITARY SERVICE?

    One of the most important questions in Turkish citizenship law is whether foreign men who acquire Turkish citizenship later in life become subject to compulsory military service.

    The answer requires particular attention to Article 43 of Military Recruitment Law No. 7179.

    The legislation does not subject all newly naturalized citizens to exactly the same military service obligations.

    Instead, the individual’s age at naturalization, previous military service, and the legal method through which citizenship was acquired are decisive.

    8.1. Naturalized citizens aged 22 or older

    Under Article 43, persons who acquire Turkish citizenship in the calendar year in which they are 22 years of age or older are generally considered to have fulfilled their military service obligation.

    This rule is subject to the statutory exception concerning persons who acquire Turkish citizenship through descent.

    Importantly, the exemption does not necessarily require the individual to have completed military service in another country.

    The statutory age requirement constitutes an independent legal basis for treating the military service obligation as fulfilled.

    For example, a foreign man who acquires Turkish citizenship at the age of 30 and has never performed military service in any country may nevertheless be legally considered to have fulfilled his Turkish military service obligation, provided that the conditions of Article 43 are satisfied.

    In such circumstances, the individual does not obtain exemption by paying the paid military service fee.

    Instead, the relevant legislation treats the obligation itself as having been fulfilled.

    8.2. Why does the legal method of acquiring citizenship matter?

    Turkish citizenship may be acquired through birth, descent, ordinary naturalization, exceptional naturalization, or other procedures established by Turkish Citizenship Law No. 5901.

    The legal basis of citizenship acquisition may directly affect whether the military service exemption under Article 43 is applicable.

    In particular, individuals whose Turkish citizenship is established or registered through descent must not automatically be treated in the same manner as foreign nationals who subsequently acquire Turkish citizenship by a decision of the competent authorities.

    Failure to distinguish these categories may lead to serious legal errors in military registration and exemption decisions.

    IX. HOW IS THE AGE OF 22 CALCULATED FOR NEWLY NATURALIZED CITIZENS?

    The calculation of age is a particularly important issue under Article 43 of Military Recruitment Law No. 7179 and Article 90 of the Military Recruitment Regulation.

    According to the administrative rules explained by the Ministry of National Defence, the year of birth is taken into account rather than the precise day and month of birth.

    In practical terms, the relevant age is calculated by subtracting the person’s year of birth from the calendar year in which Turkish citizenship was acquired.

    Year of Birth Naturalization Year Calculated Age General Legal Result
    1990 2026 36 Military service deemed completed
    2000 2026 26 Military service deemed completed
    2004 2026 22 Military service deemed completed
    2005 2026 21 Military obligation and deferment must be examined
    2007 2026 19 Military service age and deferment rules must be examined

    These examples concern individuals acquiring Turkish citizenship for the first time, outside the statutory exception applicable to citizenship through descent.

    Different rules may apply to persons who lose and subsequently reacquire Turkish citizenship or who fall within the scope of special international agreements.

    Consider an individual born on December 31, 2004, who acquires Turkish citizenship on January 1, 2026.

    Although the individual has not yet reached his twenty-second birthday in the ordinary chronological sense, the difference between the naturalization year and birth year is 22.

    Accordingly, the statutory age requirement may be satisfied.

    This distinction may become particularly important when naturalization procedures are completed near the beginning or end of a calendar year.

    X. WHAT OPTIONS ARE AVAILABLE TO NATURALIZED CITIZENS AGED 21 OR YOUNGER?

    Men who acquire Turkish citizenship at an age that does not satisfy the statutory exemption under Article 43 may become subject to military service unless another legally recognized exemption or completed-service provision applies.

    However, Article 43 also provides an important deferment mechanism.

    Eligible individuals may request deferment of military service for two years from the date on which Turkish citizenship was acquired.

    This deferment should not be assumed to have been automatically entered into every individual’s military records.

    The applicant should verify the administrative status of the deferment and obtain confirmation from the relevant military recruitment office.

    10.1. What happens when the two-year deferment expires?

    Following expiry of the deferment period, the person may become subject to the applicable military registration and classification procedures.

    If the individual remains entitled to educational deferment or another statutory postponement, those possibilities must be separately examined.

    10.2. Newly naturalized university students

    University enrollment may provide an additional statutory basis for military service deferment.

    However, the two-year deferment associated with naturalization and a deferment based on educational status arise from different legal provisions.

    It should not be assumed that separate deferment periods can always be automatically added together.

    The date of university enrollment, age limits, earlier military registration history, and any draft evasion or failure-to-report status must be examined.

    XI. DOES MILITARY SERVICE COMPLETED IN ANOTHER COUNTRY COUNT IN TÜRKİYE?

    Article 43 of Law No. 7179 recognizes certain circumstances in which a person who subsequently acquires Turkish citizenship may be deemed to have fulfilled military service because of previous military service in the country of origin.

    Individuals who properly document that they completed military service, or were legally considered to have completed it, before acquiring Turkish citizenship may qualify under this provision.

    This rule is especially relevant to persons naturalized before reaching the age of 22.

    For example, a foreign national who acquires Turkish citizenship at the age of 21, having previously completed compulsory military service in his country of origin, should not automatically be classified as required to perform military service in Türkiye merely because he does not satisfy the age-based exemption.

    The recognition of previous military service must be assessed separately.

    11.1. What documents are required?

    According to the Ministry of National Defence’s explanations concerning naturalized citizens, documents establishing previous military service must be submitted in their original form, accompanied by Turkish translations prepared by a sworn translator and notarized as required.

    Depending on the country issuing the documents and the relevant international agreements, an apostille certificate or consular legalization may also be required.

    For persons whose previous foreign military service was legally regarded as completed without ordinary active duty, the relevant foreign authority’s decision and its legal basis should be examined.

    11.2. Foreign medical exemptions

    Some individuals may have commenced military service abroad but subsequently been discharged or exempted because of medical conditions.

    Under the relevant rules, such circumstances may qualify for recognition in Türkiye where the prescribed requirements are met.

    However, a foreign medical exemption certificate does not necessarily produce an identical exemption in Türkiye in every case.

    The previous military service history, the nature of the foreign decision, and the statutory recognition conditions remain important.

    XII. DUAL CITIZENSHIP, CITIZENSHIP BY DESCENT, AND TURKISH CYPRIOT NATIONALS

    12.1. Are all dual nationals exempt from Turkish military service?

    No. Dual nationality alone does not create an automatic exemption from compulsory military service in Türkiye.

    The decisive considerations include when Turkish citizenship was acquired, how it was acquired, when the other nationality was obtained, and whether an applicable bilateral agreement exists.

    12.2. Turkish citizens by birth

    A male individual who has been a Turkish citizen since birth and also possesses a foreign nationality generally remains subject to the ordinary Turkish military service rules.

    The age-based exemption under Article 43 cannot be applied merely because the individual holds more than one nationality.

    12.3. Citizenship acquired through descent

    Article 43 contains a specific exception regarding individuals who subsequently acquire Turkish citizenship through descent.

    Consequently, delayed registration of Turkish citizenship acquired through family lineage must be distinguished from naturalization by a decision of the competent Turkish authorities.

    The date on which citizenship was entered into the population register does not necessarily establish that citizenship was first acquired on that date.

    12.4. Dual nationals who completed military service abroad

    Following the entry into force of the new military recruitment framework in June 2019, military service performed in a foreign state by dual nationals is no longer recognized under an unrestricted general rule.

    Nevertheless, applicable bilateral agreements concerning mutual recognition of military service and legally protected transitional arrangements may remain relevant.

    The Ministry of National Defence has referred to arrangements involving Tunisia in its official explanations.

    Therefore, a man who has held both Turkish and German nationality since birth cannot necessarily rely solely on military service completed in another country as proof that his Turkish military service obligation has been discharged.

    12.5. Citizens of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus

    The legal situation of persons who acquire Turkish citizenship while holding citizenship of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus requires separate analysis.

    Article 42 of Turkish Citizenship Law No. 5901 and the applicable military service provisions must be considered together.

    Any special rules relating to the recognition of military service or the acquisition of Turkish citizenship must be assessed in the context of the particular individual’s circumstances.

    XIII. MILITARY SERVICE OBLIGATIONS OF TURKISH CITIZENS NATURALIZED THROUGH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT

    Foreign nationals may acquire Turkish citizenship through qualifying investment under the exceptional naturalization provisions of Article 12 of Turkish Citizenship Law No. 5901 and the relevant implementing legislation.

    However, obtaining Turkish citizenship through real estate investment does not itself constitute a special military service exemption.

    The applicant’s age and legal method of citizenship acquisition must be assessed under Article 43 of Law No. 7179.

    For example, a male investor who acquires Turkish citizenship through a qualifying real estate investment at the age of 40 in 2026 will generally be regarded as having fulfilled his military service obligation, provided that the relevant statutory conditions apply.

    The legal position of the investor’s family members may be different.

    Suppose the same investor has a 19-year-old son who also acquires Turkish citizenship.

    The son’s military status cannot automatically be assumed to be identical to that of his father.

    The relevant questions include the son’s citizenship acquisition procedure, the date of the naturalization decision, his age, previous military service, and any applicable deferment or exemption.

    For this reason, citizenship-by-investment applications should address the military service status of male family members as part of the overall legal planning process.

    The conditions and legal risks associated with Turkish citizenship by investment are examined in our related publication:

    Turkish Citizenship by Investment in 2026: Requirements and Legal Risks.

    XIV. HOW DO ANNULMENT, LOSS, OR REACQUISITION OF TURKISH CITIZENSHIP AFFECT MILITARY SERVICE?

    The annulment, loss, withdrawal, and reacquisition of Turkish citizenship may create substantial legal consequences concerning military service.

    However, these legal concepts must be distinguished carefully.

    Annulment of a citizenship acquisition decision, deprivation of citizenship, permitted renunciation, and the various statutory mechanisms for loss of nationality do not necessarily have identical legal grounds or effects.

    14.1. What happens to military records when citizenship is annulled?

    When a person’s Turkish citizenship status changes, the relevant population and citizenship records may need to be reflected in the military recruitment system.

    The Ministry of National Defence’s administrative explanations refer to the electronic transfer of relevant citizenship information from the Directorate General of Population and Citizenship Affairs to the Directorate General of Recruitment.

    Nevertheless, it would be legally unsafe to conclude that the entire issue has been conclusively resolved merely because a particular status appears in an e-Government record.

    The legal basis of the citizenship decision, its effective date, any pending judicial challenge, population records, and military recruitment records should be examined together.

    14.2. Does loss of citizenship eliminate previous military liabilities?

    There is no universally applicable answer.

    The legal consequences depend on the statutory basis for loss of citizenship, the temporal effect of the relevant decision, and the previous military history of the individual.

    For example, determining whether an obligation to perform future military service continues after loss of citizenship is legally distinct from determining the validity of an administrative fine imposed during an earlier period.

    It should therefore not be assumed that every previously issued administrative decision or penalty automatically disappears when citizenship is lost.

    14.3. Reacquisition of Turkish citizenship

    Article 43(2) of Military Recruitment Law No. 7179 provides a special rule concerning persons who lose Turkish citizenship and subsequently reacquire it.

    Their military recruitment procedures are carried out by taking their previous military service history into account.

    This rule is particularly important for individuals whose citizenship previously ended through renunciation or another legally recognized mechanism and who later become Turkish citizens again.

    Consider a person who was subject to military service during an earlier period of Turkish citizenship, subsequently lost Turkish citizenship, and reacquired it many years later.

    The fact that the individual is older than 22 when citizenship is reacquired does not necessarily create a new exemption under the first paragraph of Article 43.

    Instead, the individual’s previous military record must be examined under the provision governing reacquisition.

    14.4. Judicial protection in citizenship and military service disputes

    Where a citizenship annulment or withdrawal decision is challenged before an administrative court, military registration and classification issues may also arise.

    The outcome of the citizenship proceedings may have consequences for the individual’s underlying military status.

    However, filing a citizenship lawsuit does not automatically suspend every related military service decision.

    Separate administrative applications, annulment proceedings, and requests for suspension of execution may be necessary depending on the nature of the contested military decision.

    Further analysis concerning citizenship withdrawal, investment valuation disputes, and judicial remedies can be found in our related article:

    Annulment and Withdrawal of Turkish Citizenship Acquired Through Investment.

    XV. MILITARY SERVICE DEFERMENT FOR STUDENTS

    Military service deferment is legally distinct from exemption.

    An exemption generally removes or discharges the relevant obligation under applicable law, whereas deferment postpones the date on which the obligation must be fulfilled.

    Article 20 of Military Recruitment Law No. 7179 and the relevant regulations provide deferment mechanisms for qualifying educational circumstances.

    Educational Category General Maximum Age
    High school or equivalent education 22
    University or higher education 28
    Master’s degree and qualifying postgraduate education 32
    Doctoral studies, qualifying specialization, or proficiency in arts 35

    These ages represent general upper limits. The existence of educational enrollment does not necessarily establish an unconditional right to deferment until the relevant age.

    The actual legal assessment must also take into account enrollment dates, previous educational qualifications, graduation, termination of studies, and any earlier military registration violations.

    Additional deferment opportunities may be available following graduation or termination of certain educational programs.

    For example, graduates of university programs lasting four years or longer may qualify for a two-year post-graduation deferment, subject to the applicable age limits and other statutory conditions.

    For newly naturalized citizens, the interaction between the naturalization-related deferment and education-based deferment requires careful examination.

    XVI. MEDICAL EXEMPTIONS FROM MILITARY SERVICE

    Individuals who are medically unfit for military service may qualify for exemption under the relevant legislation.

    However, an individual cannot obtain a final military exemption merely by declaring himself medically unfit or submitting an ordinary medical opinion from an unauthorized healthcare institution.

    The relevant statutory provisions include Articles 15, 16, and 17 of Military Recruitment Law No. 7179 and the Regulation on the Health Competence of the Turkish Armed Forces, Gendarmerie General Command, and Coast Guard Command.

    16.1. How does the medical examination process work?

    The initial medical assessment may be carried out by a family physician or another authorized healthcare institution as part of the military registration process.

    Where necessary, the individual is referred to an authorized medical board.

    A final medical determination that a person is unfit for military service is subject to the procedures governing the relevant medical board report and its official approval.

    16.2. Can a medical decision be challenged?

    Yes. The relevant legislation provides a procedure for challenging military medical determinations.

    According to the Ministry of National Defence’s published guidance, an objection to an approved medical report may be submitted through the military recruitment office within 30 days following notification or delivery of the report.

    The administrative medical objection procedure must be distinguished from possible judicial review of an administrative decision based on the medical findings.

    16.3. Psychiatric conditions and chronic illnesses

    Chronic diseases, physical disabilities, psychiatric disorders, and other medical conditions may be relevant to determining eligibility for military service.

    Nevertheless, the mere existence of a medical diagnosis does not automatically establish an exemption.

    The relevant legal assessment depends on the nature and severity of the condition, its functional consequences, and the applicable medical classification rules.

    Obtaining or submitting fraudulent medical documentation may also give rise to separate legal and criminal liability.

    XVII. DRAFT EVASION, FAILURE TO REPORT FOR SERVICE, AND ADMINISTRATIVE FINES IN 2026

    Turkish military service law distinguishes among several forms of non-compliance, including failure to undergo military registration, remaining unregistered, and failure to report for service after being called up.

    The Turkish legal terms yoklama kaçağı, saklı, and bakaya refer to different administrative situations.

    A person classified as yoklama kaçağı has failed to complete the required military registration procedures within the applicable period.

    A person classified as bakaya has failed to report for military service despite being subject to a call-up or deployment obligation.

    These classifications may result in administrative penalties and, under the conditions prescribed by law, criminal consequences.

    17.1. Administrative fines in 2026

    The Ministry of National Defence has published the following daily administrative fine amounts for 2026:

    Circumstance Daily Administrative Fine
    Voluntary reporting TRY 58.13
    Apprehension by the authorities TRY 116.27

    These administrative fines must not be confused with the additional fee imposed on certain applicants seeking paid military service after periods of draft evasion or failure to report.

    The two financial obligations arise from different statutory provisions.

    17.2. Additional paid military service fee

    For the second half of 2026, the applicable additional monthly fee is TRY 5,514.29.

    The amount is calculated by reference to qualifying periods during which the person remained a draft evader, unregistered, or absent after call-up, subject to legally recognized excuses.

    Under the relevant calculation method, a period of between one and thirty days may count as one calculation month.

    For example, four applicable calculation months would produce an additional fee of TRY 22,057.16 at the second-half 2026 rate.

    Combined with the standard paid military service fee, the illustrative total would be TRY 494,710.76.

    This is an example only. The actual calculation must take into account the individual’s complete record, relevant periods, legal excuses, and the rate applicable when payment is made.

    17.3. Does payment of an administrative fine complete military service?

    No.

    Payment of an administrative fine does not constitute performance of compulsory military service.

    The individual’s substantive military obligation must still be resolved under the relevant legislation.

    Likewise, payment of an additional fee required for paid military service does not necessarily cancel a previously imposed administrative fine.

    17.4. Administrative penalties incorrectly imposed on naturalized citizens

    Incorrect military records may create particularly serious difficulties for newly naturalized Turkish citizens.

    For example, a male individual who acquires Turkish citizenship at the age of 30 may incorrectly appear in the military recruitment system as having failed to complete registration.

    Before determining whether the individual has violated military service legislation, it is necessary to establish whether he was legally subject to the relevant obligation at all.

    If Article 43 applies and the person should be considered to have fulfilled military service, the administrative and legal basis of any penalty must be reconsidered.

    The Ministry of National Defence’s guidance also addresses circumstances in which administrative fines may be cancelled following the determination that a person was legally exempt or entitled to a relevant deferment.

    XVIII. LEGAL REMEDIES AGAINST TURKISH MILITARY SERVICE DECISIONS

    Disputes concerning military service may involve administrative registration, exemption refusals, medical decisions, classification, deployment, administrative fines, or criminal proceedings.

    These matters are not necessarily subject to the same appeal procedure or judicial deadline.

    18.1. Administrative application to the military recruitment office

    Where a military record contains incorrect citizenship information, an incorrect birth year, missing exemption information, or another administrative error, the individual may submit a written application to the competent military recruitment office.

    The application should identify the relevant legal basis and include supporting documents such as:

    • Turkish identification and civil registry records;
    • Naturalization decisions and supporting citizenship records;
    • Documents establishing the date and method of citizenship acquisition;
    • Previous military service certificates;
    • Medical decisions or educational records where relevant;
    • Copies of disputed administrative decisions.

    18.2. Objections to administrative fines

    Under Article 27 of Misdemeanours Law No. 5326, an administrative fine may generally be challenged before the competent Criminal Judgeship of Peace within fifteen days following notification or pronouncement of the decision.

    Depending on the facts, the objection may address the absence of a legal military service obligation, an applicable exemption, a valid deferment, procedural irregularities, or the absence of the alleged violation.

    The deadline for challenging an administrative fine must not be confused with the ordinary deadline for bringing an administrative annulment action against a different military service decision.

    18.3. Annulment proceedings before administrative courts

    Where an administrative authority unlawfully refuses an exemption, incorrectly determines military service status, or adopts an unlawful deployment decision, judicial review before an administrative court may be available.

    Under Article 7 of Administrative Judicial Procedure Law No. 2577, the ordinary period for filing an annulment action before an administrative court is sixty days.

    However, the legal nature of the administrative decision, notification requirements, and any special statutory deadline must be examined in each case.

    The effect of an administrative application on the limitation period must also be assessed under the relevant provisions of Law No. 2577.

    18.4. Suspension of execution

    An unlawful military service decision may expose the affected individual to consequences that are difficult or impossible to remedy.

    For example, a person who is legally entitled to exemption but is nevertheless ordered to report for military service may require urgent judicial protection.

    Under Article 27 of Law No. 2577, the court may order suspension of execution where the applicable statutory conditions are satisfied, including manifest unlawfulness and the risk of irreparable or difficult-to-compensate harm.

    However, filing an administrative lawsuit or an application to the authorities does not automatically suspend the challenged decision.

    The existence and effect of an actual suspension order are decisive.

    18.5. Criminal investigations concerning military service violations

    In certain circumstances, violations involving draft evasion or failure to report may give rise to criminal proceedings following the administrative sanction process or under special statutory provisions.

    Different rules may also apply during mobilization or wartime.

    Criminal liability must be distinguished from the legality of the underlying administrative military service decision.

    The existence of a criminal investigation does not, by itself, establish that the administrative determination of military status was lawful.

    XIX. CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION, CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, AND THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS

    Compulsory military service is not merely a matter of administrative regulation. It also raises significant constitutional and international human rights questions.

    Conscientious objection refers to an individual’s refusal to perform military service because of genuinely held religious, ethical, moral, or philosophical convictions.

    As of October 23, 2026, Turkish legislation does not establish a general and independent statutory exemption from compulsory military service based exclusively on conscientious objection.

    Nevertheless, the European Court of Human Rights has addressed conscientious objection under Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protects freedom of thought, conscience, and religion.

    The Court’s judgment in Bayatyan v. Armenia is particularly important because it recognized that opposition to military service arising from sufficiently serious and compelling convictions may fall within the protection of Article 9.

    Other judgments, including Ülke v. Türkiye, demonstrate the importance of assessing repeated penalties and the wider legal consequences experienced by conscientious objectors.

    The judgment in Kanatlı v. Türkiye also raises significant questions concerning conscientious objection in the context of reserve military obligations.

    However, developments in international human rights jurisprudence must not be confused with the existence of an unconditional administrative exemption under current Turkish domestic legislation.

    An individual who refuses to comply with military service requirements solely on the basis of conscientious objection may still face administrative or criminal consequences under domestic law.

    The fundamental legal question concerns the balance between the state’s authority to regulate national service and the individual’s protected freedom of conscience.

    XX. LATEST DEVELOPMENTS IN TURKISH MILITARY SERVICE LAW IN 2026

    20.1. April 17, 2026: Legislative increase in paid military service fees

    Following publication of Law No. 7577 in the Official Gazette, the statutory indicator used to calculate the paid military service fee increased.

    The Ministry of National Defence subsequently announced a fee of TRY 416,361.30 for the relevant April 2026 period.

    20.2. June 5, 2026: Warning concerning the July fee adjustment

    The Ministry of National Defence announced that the paid military service amount would change on July 1, 2026, following adjustment of the civil servant monthly salary coefficient.

    Applicants wishing to benefit from the earlier fee were advised to complete the necessary application and payment procedures before the adjustment.

    20.3. July 7, 2026: New paid military service amount announced

    The paid military service fee for the second half of 2026 was announced as TRY 472,653.60.

    The additional monthly fee applicable to certain applicants with previous periods of draft evasion or failure to report was announced as TRY 5,514.29.

    Application procedures were resumed in accordance with the official announcement.

    20.4. July 27, 2026: November 2026 military classification period

    The Ministry of National Defence published an announcement concerning the November 2026 classification period.

    According to that announcement, relevant registration and service preference procedures were required to be completed by August 31, 2026.

    As of the publication date of this article, classification results were scheduled to be announced on October 27, 2026.

    20.5. Upcoming deployment dates

    Military Service Category Scheduled Deployment Date
    Reserve officer and reserve NCO candidates; enlisted personnel Group 1 November 5, 2026
    Enlisted personnel Group 2 December 3, 2026
    Enlisted personnel Group 3 January 7, 2027

    According to the relevant official announcement, deployment documents may be obtained through the e-Government system or military recruitment offices starting ten days before the relevant deployment date.

    Individual classification and deployment information should always be checked through official records.

    Official source: Ministry of National Defence – November 2026 Classification Period Announcement.

    XXI. PRACTICAL LEGAL CASES AND POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS

    Case 1: Foreign investor naturalized at the age of 35

    A foreign national born in 1988 acquires Turkish citizenship through qualifying real estate investment in 2026.

    He has never performed military service in any country. Nevertheless, the authorities indicate that he may be required to perform military service in Türkiye.

    Legal assessment: If this is the individual’s first acquisition of Turkish citizenship and the statutory exception concerning citizenship through descent does not apply, Article 43 of Law No. 7179 should be considered.

    Because the individual was older than 22 in the year of naturalization, he may be legally deemed to have fulfilled his military service obligation.

    Proposed legal solution: Submit the naturalization decision and supporting citizenship records to the competent military recruitment office and request correction of the military service record. If an unlawful refusal or penalty exists, consider the applicable administrative or judicial remedies.

    Case 2: A 21-year-old newly naturalized university student

    A male foreign national born in 2005 acquires Turkish citizenship in 2026 and is enrolled at a Turkish university.

    Legal assessment: The individual does not satisfy the age-based exemption under Article 43. However, the two-year naturalization-related deferment and the education-based deferment rules may be relevant.

    Proposed legal solution: Examine the naturalization decision, student enrollment records, and military registration data. Determine which deferment provisions may apply and ensure that the administrative record accurately reflects the individual’s legal status.

    Case 3: An Afghan national who completed military service before naturalization

    A 21-year-old Afghan national acquires Turkish citizenship after having completed military service in his country of origin.

    Legal assessment: Although the individual does not satisfy the age-based exemption, previous military service may qualify for recognition under Article 43.

    Proposed legal solution: Obtain the original foreign military service documents, arrange the required authentication and Turkish translations, and submit the application to the competent military recruitment authority.

    Case 4: A dual Turkish-German citizen residing in Germany

    A male individual has held Turkish citizenship since birth and also possesses German nationality.

    He resides in Germany and has never completed military service in Türkiye.

    Legal assessment: Dual nationality does not automatically activate the naturalization exemption under Article 43.

    However, the individual may qualify for overseas deferment or foreign currency military service, depending on residence, employment, and other statutory requirements.

    Proposed legal solution: Examine residence permits, employment records, entry and exit history, and the 1,095-day requirement. Determine the appropriate consular and military recruitment procedures.

    Case 5: Reacquisition of Turkish citizenship following previous loss

    An individual who was previously a Turkish citizen and subject to military service later loses Turkish citizenship. Several years afterward, he reacquires Turkish nationality.

    Legal assessment: The individual cannot automatically be treated as someone acquiring Turkish citizenship for the first time.

    His previous military service history must be taken into consideration under Article 43(2).

    Proposed legal solution: Examine the earlier citizenship records, the military service status at the time citizenship was lost, and the subsequent reacquisition decision.

    Case 6: An administrative fine imposed despite an existing exemption

    A man acquires Turkish citizenship for the first time at the age of 28 in 2026.

    His military records do not reflect an exemption, and an administrative fine for failure to complete military registration is imposed.

    Legal assessment: Before assessing any alleged violation, it must be determined whether the individual was legally subject to military service.

    If Article 43 applies, the legal basis of the administrative fine may be contested.

    Proposed legal solution: Request correction of the military registration record and consider an objection against the administrative fine within the applicable fifteen-day period.

    XXII. LEGAL ACTION PLAN FOR NEWLY NATURALIZED TURKISH CITIZENS

    Before concluding whether a newly naturalized Turkish citizen is subject to compulsory military service, the following questions should be examined systematically:

    1. Was Turkish citizenship acquired for the first time, or was it reacquired?
    2. What is the precise date and legal basis of citizenship acquisition?
    3. Was citizenship acquired by descent or through a decision of the competent authorities?
    4. How old was the individual in the calendar year of naturalization?
    5. Did the individual complete military service in the country of origin?
    6. Can previous foreign military service be established through legally acceptable documents?
    7. What military service status currently appears in Turkish official records?
    8. Does the person qualify for exemption, deferment, or recognition of completed military service?
    9. Are there any draft evasion records, deployment decisions, or administrative fines?
    10. Is an administrative application, objection, or judicial proceeding necessary?

    Only after these questions have been resolved should the individual determine whether payment for military service or actual military attendance is required.

    This is particularly important for individuals who may already be considered to have fulfilled their military service obligation under Article 43.

    Unnecessary payment made because of an incorrect administrative record may create subsequent disputes concerning reimbursement and the correction of military records.

    The appropriate legal approach is therefore to establish the individual’s legal military status first and to evaluate financial or physical military service obligations only afterward.

    XXIII. FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT MILITARY SERVICE IN TÜRKİYE

    1. What is the paid military service fee in Türkiye in 2026?

    The fee for July 1–December 31, 2026, is TRY 472,653.60.

    2. What is the additional fee for draft evaders applying for paid military service?

    The additional calculation amount is TRY 5,514.29 per applicable month during the second half of 2026. The actual amount depends on the relevant period and legal circumstances.

    3. How long is ordinary compulsory military service?

    The standard enlisted military service period is six months.

    4. How long is reserve officer service?

    Twelve months.

    5. Must applicants for foreign currency military service travel to Türkiye?

    Qualifying applicants generally do not need to complete in-person basic military training in Türkiye. Completion of the prescribed distance education and other administrative requirements is necessary.

    6. I acquired Turkish citizenship at the age of 30. Must I perform military service?

    If you acquired Turkish citizenship for the first time through a qualifying procedure other than the excluded descent category, you may be considered to have fulfilled military service under Article 43.

    7. Does my exact birthday matter for the 22-year rule?

    Under the applicable administrative calculation, the relevant calendar years are used rather than the precise day and month of birth.

    8. Are Turkish citizens naturalized through investment exempt from military service?

    Investment alone does not create an exemption. Age at naturalization and the applicable statutory conditions must be examined.

    9. Will an 18-year-old child who acquires Turkish citizenship later have to serve?

    Potentially. The individual may not qualify for the age-based exemption, but the method of acquiring citizenship, previous military service, deferment opportunities, and other exemptions must be examined.

    10. I already completed military service abroad. Must I serve again in Türkiye?

    The answer depends on whether you acquired Turkish citizenship later in life or were a Turkish citizen from birth, as well as on the relevant legislation and any applicable international agreements.

    11. Does dual nationality automatically exempt me?

    No.

    12. Can a newly naturalized 20-year-old obtain a military service deferment?

    A two-year deferment may be requested under Article 43, subject to the statutory conditions. Other deferment possibilities should be considered separately.

    13. Can paid military service fees be paid in installments?

    The current ordinary system requires payment in full.

    14. Is one month of military training compulsory for paid military service?

    Generally, yes.

    15. How long do I have to challenge a military administrative fine?

    Generally, fifteen days following the legally effective notification or pronouncement of the decision.

    16. Can I bring a lawsuit if my exemption application is rejected?

    An administrative annulment action may be available depending on the nature of the decision. The ordinary period is sixty days, subject to applicable special rules.

    17. Does the annulment of Turkish citizenship automatically cancel previous military fines?

    Not necessarily. The legal basis and temporal effect of the citizenship decision, together with the relevant military and penalty records, must be examined.

    18. If I reacquire Turkish citizenship after the age of 22, am I automatically exempt?

    No. Previous military service history must be considered under the special rules governing reacquisition of citizenship.

    19. Can a family doctor issue a final military service exemption?

    A family physician may perform initial medical assessments and refer the individual to the appropriate institution. A final unfitness determination is subject to the authorized medical board and official procedures.

    20. What is the exact foreign currency military service fee in euros?

    The euro amount is not fixed throughout the year. It is calculated using the applicable exchange rate on the payment date.

    XXIV. CONCLUSION AND COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL ASSESSMENT

    Compulsory military service in Türkiye constitutes an important public law obligation rooted in the Constitution and implemented through a detailed statutory and administrative framework.

    The system established by Military Recruitment Law No. 7179 provides several legally distinct methods of fulfilling military service, including six-month enlisted service, twelve-month reserve officer or reserve non-commissioned officer service, paid military service, and foreign currency military service.

    It also recognizes exemptions, deferments, and legal circumstances in which military service is deemed to have been completed.

    The most significant financial development of 2026 has been the increase in the statutory indicator used to calculate paid military service fees through Law No. 7577.

    As a result, the paid military service fee reached TRY 472,653.60 for the second half of the year.

    However, the most challenging legal issues in military service law are not necessarily financial.

    For individuals acquiring Turkish citizenship later in life, the existence of any military obligation depends on the legal basis and date of naturalization, age, previous military service, earlier citizenship history, and the accuracy of administrative records.

    Article 43 of Military Recruitment Law No. 7179 establishes an important legal safeguard for qualifying naturalized citizens who are at least 22 years old in the calendar year in which citizenship is acquired.

    Yet this provision must be interpreted together with the statutory exceptions concerning citizenship by descent and the reacquisition of Turkish citizenship.

    Incorrect military classification can result in consequences extending beyond an administrative error.

    It may lead to deployment orders, draft evasion records, administrative fines, and potentially criminal proceedings.

    Accordingly, the fundamental legal question should always be whether the individual was subject to the relevant military service obligation in the first place.

    Only after that determination has been made should the authorities assess the duration, manner, and financial consequences of military service.

    An individual who is legally deemed to have fulfilled military service should not be required to make an unnecessary payment or complete military training merely because of an incorrect administrative record.

    Similarly, an individual who remains subject to compulsory military service should not assume that residence abroad, possession of another nationality, or participation in a naturalization procedure automatically eliminates the obligation.

    The rule of law requires military obligations to be imposed and administered in accordance with clear statutory provisions, individual legal circumstances, and effective judicial safeguards.

    From this perspective, military service law is not merely concerned with the question of how many months an individual must serve or how much money must be paid.

    Its central legal question is the authority of the state to establish, modify, defer, enforce, and terminate compulsory military service obligations within the limits imposed by constitutional law, statutory legislation, and fundamental rights.

    XXV. LEGISLATION, OFFICIAL SOURCES, AND ACADEMIC BIBLIOGRAPHY

    A. Constitutional and Legislative Sources

    1. Constitution of the Republic of Türkiye, particularly Articles 10, 24, 72, and 125. Constitutional Court – Official Constitutional Text.
    2. Military Recruitment Law No. 7179, Official Gazette dated June 26, 2019, No. 30813; particularly Articles 2–9, 14–24, and 38–45.
    3. Military Recruitment Regulation (Askeralma Yönetmeliği), July 22, 2020, including provisions concerning paid military service, foreign currency military service, deferments, exemptions, and naturalized citizens.
    4. Law No. 7577 Amending Certain Laws, adopted April 2, 2026, Official Gazette dated April 17, 2026, No. 33227. Grand National Assembly of Türkiye – Legislative Record.
    5. Turkish Citizenship Law No. 5901, particularly Articles 12, 29, 31, 32, 40, and 42.
    6. Administrative Judicial Procedure Law No. 2577, particularly Articles 7, 11, and 27.
    7. Misdemeanours Law No. 5326, particularly Articles 17 and 27.
    8. Regulation on the Health Competence of the Turkish Armed Forces, Gendarmerie General Command, and Coast Guard Command.
    9. Notification Law No. 7201.

    B. Official Ministry of National Defence Sources

    1. Ministry of National Defence, July 7, 2026, Paid Military Service Application Announcement for July 1–December 31, 2026.
    2. Ministry of National Defence, Citizenship Procedures and Military Service Obligations of Naturalized Turkish Citizens.
    3. Ministry of National Defence, Paid Military Service: Eligibility and Procedures.
    4. Ministry of National Defence, Foreign Currency Military Service Procedures.
    5. Ministry of National Defence, Student Military Service Deferment Procedures.
    6. Ministry of National Defence, Administrative Procedures and Penalties for Draft Evasion and Failure to Report.
    7. Ministry of National Defence, November 2026 Military Classification Announcement, July 27, 2026.
    8. Ministry of National Defence, Military Service and Discharge Procedures.
    9. Ministry of National Defence, Frequently Asked Questions.
    10. Ministry of National Defence, Foreign Currency Military Service Distance Education Portal.

    C. Academic Publications and International Human Rights Sources

    1. Pala, Gülşah, “Osmanlı Asker Alma Sisteminde Bedel-i Şahsî: Askerlik Yükümlülüğüne Alternatif Bir Uygulama” [An Alternative to Military Service Obligations in the Ottoman Recruitment System], Marmara Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2026. DergiPark.
    2. Fidan, Merve; Hasta, Derya, “Vicdani Redde Yönelik Tutumların Yordanması: Erkek Rolleri ve İnsan Haklarına Yönelik Tutumların Aracı Rolü Üzerine Bir Çalışma” [Predicting Attitudes Toward Conscientious Objection], Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, Vol. 41, No. 97, 2026. DergiPark.
    3. “Vicdanın Yedeği Olabilir mi: Güncel Bir Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi Kararının İncelemesi – Kanatlı/Türkiye” [Can Conscience Have a Reserve? An Analysis of Kanatlı v. Türkiye], Yaşar Hukuk Dergisi. DergiPark.
    4. “Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi Kararlarında Vicdani Ret” [Conscientious Objection in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights], Istanbul Medipol University Faculty of Law Journal. DergiPark.
    5. Batıgün, Elif Selen, “5901 Sayılı Türk Vatandaşlığı Kanunu’na Göre Vatandaşlığın Kaybettirilmesi” [Deprivation of Citizenship under Turkish Citizenship Law No. 5901], İnönü University Faculty of Law Journal, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2026. DergiPark.
    6. European Court of Human Rights, Bayatyan v. Armenia, Application No. 23459/03, July 7, 2011.
    7. European Court of Human Rights, Ülke v. Türkiye, Application No. 39437/98, January 24, 2006.
    8. European Court of Human Rights, Kanatlı v. Türkiye, Application No. 18382/15, March 12, 2024.

    Statutory provisions, official administrative guidance, historical legal scholarship, and international human rights jurisprudence have been considered separately throughout this study.

    Academic publications are cited as scholarly contributions to legal analysis rather than as substitutes for binding legislation or judicial decisions.

    XXVI. RELATED LEGAL PUBLICATIONS BY DOLĞUN AKADEMİ

    Readers interested in the relationship between military service, Turkish nationality, citizenship by investment, and administrative litigation may consult the following related publications:

    1. Turkish Citizenship by Investment in 2026: Current Requirements, Investment Amounts, and Legal Risks. Examines investment requirements, the acquisition of Turkish citizenship, and the legal status of naturalized citizens.
    2. Annulment and Withdrawal of Turkish Citizenship Acquired Through Investment. Examines administrative annulment, withdrawal, and judicial remedies.
    3. Turkish Citizenship Annulment and Withdrawal in 2026: Valuation Reports, Insufficient Investments, Family Members, Children, Military Service, and Investigated Construction Companies. Addresses citizenship-related legal risks affecting individuals and their families.
    4. Can Turkish Citizenship Be Annulled Despite a Genuine Investment?. Examines administrative procedures, evidence preservation, valuation issues, and legal protection.

    ABOUT THE AUTHOR AND LEGAL CONTACT INFORMATION

    Attorney Murat Can Dolğun
    Member of the Istanbul Bar Association
    Law Lecturer at Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa
    TD Law Firm
    Dolğun Akademi

    Areas of Practice: Turkish Citizenship Law, Immigration and Foreigners Law, Administrative Law, Criminal Law, Constitutional Law, and Private International Law.

    Office Address:
    Istanbul World Trade Center
    Block A2, Office 206
    Yeşilköy, Bakırköy, Istanbul, Türkiye

    Telephone: +90 212 299 44 22
    Website: www.dolgun.av.tr

    Legal Disclaimer: This publication has been prepared for general legal and academic information purposes and reflects the legislative framework, official announcements, and academic materials considered as of October 23, 2026. Military service fees, administrative practices, exchange rates, classification schedules, and statutory provisions may change. Individual cases involving naturalization, military service exemptions, administrative penalties, or loss of citizenship require separate examination of the relevant legal documents and official records. This article does not constitute individualized legal advice or a guarantee of any particular legal outcome.

    DOLĞUN AKADEMİ | ATTORNEY MURAT CAN DOLĞUN | 2026

  • All Consulates in Istanbul: Addresses & Embassy Guide 2026

    All Consulates in Istanbul: Addresses & Embassy Guide 2026

    All Consulates and Embassies in Istanbul: Complete Address List by Country (2026)

    Last updated: October 22, 2026

    Author: Attorney Murat Can Dolğun | TD Law Firm, Istanbul, Türkiye

    Istanbul is one of the most important international diplomatic, commercial and cultural centers in Türkiye. The city hosts numerous foreign consulates general, consulates and honorary consular offices representing countries from around the world.

    Foreign diplomatic and consular missions provide a wide range of services, including passport applications, visa procedures, citizenship matters, document legalization, powers of attorney, notarial services and assistance to foreign nationals.

    This comprehensive guide provides an alphabetical list of foreign consulates and honorary consulates in Istanbul, including publicly available addresses and practical information concerning consular services, international legal procedures and foreign nationals’ rights in Türkiye.

    Important distinction: Most foreign embassies in Türkiye are located in Ankara, the country’s capital. Istanbul primarily hosts consulates general, consulates and honorary consulates. Therefore, this guide focuses on consular representations located in Istanbul rather than embassy headquarters in Ankara.

    Accuracy notice: Consular addresses, operating arrangements and diplomatic appointments may change. Some addresses below were collected from publicly available consular directories and have not been independently verified against current official records. Always confirm the address and operating status directly with the relevant diplomatic mission before visiting.

    1. Complete List of Consulates General and Consulates in Istanbul

    The following alphabetical directory contains the addresses of foreign consular missions in Istanbul. The list includes consulates general and other consular representations.

    Some address entries require additional verification. Inclusion in this directory does not necessarily mean that the relevant mission currently accepts visitors or provides all consular services.

    Country Consulate Address in Istanbul
    Afghanistan Levent Mahallesi, Levent Caddesi No:28, Beşiktaş, Istanbul, Türkiye.
    Albania Adnan Saygun Caddesi, Uydu Sokak No:4/14, Beşiktaş, Istanbul. Current address verification required.
    Algeria Gazeteciler Sitesi, 23 Temmuz Meydanı No:7, Esentepe, Şişli, Istanbul.
    Argentina Süzer Plaza, Askerocağı Caddesi No:9, Floor 16, Office 1602, Elmadağ, Şişli, Istanbul.
    Australia Askerocağı Caddesi No:15, Elmadağ, Şişli, Istanbul. Current address verification required.
    Austria Köybaşı Caddesi No:46, Yeniköy, Sarıyer, Istanbul.
    Azerbaijan Zeytinoğlu Caddesi No:65, Akatlar, Beşiktaş, Istanbul.
    Bangladesh Büyükdere Caddesi No:121, Ercan Han, Floor 5, Gayrettepe, Şişli, Istanbul. Verification required.
    Belarus Birgül Sokak, Toros Villa No:1/B, Florya, Bakırköy, Istanbul.
    Belgium Sıraselviler Caddesi No:39, Taksim, Beyoğlu, Istanbul.
    Bosnia and Herzegovina Dikilitaş Mahallesi, Yeni Gelin Sokak No:24, Floor 3, Beşiktaş, Istanbul.
    Brazil Süzer Plaza, Askerocağı Caddesi No:6, Floor 4, Elmadağ, Şişli, Istanbul. Verification required.
    Bulgaria Ahmet Adnan Saygun Caddesi No:34, Ulus, Beşiktaş, Istanbul.
    Canada Büyükdere Caddesi No:209, Tekfen Tower, 4. Levent, Istanbul.
    China Memduhpaşa Yalısı, Mısırlı Caddesi No:6/8, Kireçburnu, Sarıyer, Istanbul.
    Colombia Windowist, Reşitpaşa, Eski Büyükdere Caddesi No:26, Sarıyer, Istanbul.
    Croatia Asmalımescit Mahallesi, Oteller Sokak No:1/2, Tepebaşı, Beyoğlu, Istanbul.
    Czech Republic (Czechia) Abdi İpekçi Caddesi No:71, Maçka, Şişli, Istanbul.
    Denmark Trump Towers, Büyükdere Caddesi No:1, Tower 2, Floor 14, Unit 463, Şişli, Istanbul.
    Egypt Cevdet Paşa Caddesi No:12, Bebek, Beşiktaş, Istanbul. Verification required.
    France İstiklal Caddesi No:4, Taksim, Beyoğlu, Istanbul.
    Georgia Levent Mahallesi, Sümbül Sokak No:17, Beşiktaş, Istanbul.
    Germany İnönü Caddesi No:10, Gümüşsuyu, Beyoğlu, Istanbul.
    Ghana Akatlar Mahallesi, Gazeteciler Sitesi, Soltaş Evleri, Menekşe Sokak No:16, Beşiktaş, Istanbul.
    Greece Turnacıbaşı Sokak No:22, Beyoğlu, Istanbul.
    Hungary Gürsel Mahallesi, İmrahor Caddesi, Yankı Sokak No:27, Polat Ofis B Block, Kağıthane, Istanbul.
    India Cumhuriyet Caddesi No:42, Dörtler Apartmanı, Units 11-12, Elmadağ, Şişli, Istanbul.
    Indonesia Düğmeciler Mahallesi, Düğmeciler Caddesi No:52, Eyüpsultan, Istanbul. Verification required.
    Iran Ankara Caddesi No:1, Cağaloğlu, Fatih, Istanbul.
    Iraq Gazeteciler Sitesi, Hikaye Sokak No:3, Esentepe, Şişli, Istanbul. Verification required.
    Israel Levent Mahallesi, Cömert Sokak No:1C, Beşiktaş, Istanbul. Check the mission’s current public-service status before visiting.
    Italy Tom Tom Kaptan Sokak No:5, Beyoğlu, Istanbul.
    Japan Büyükdere Caddesi No:209, Tekfen Tower, Floor 10, 4. Levent, Istanbul.
    Jordan See the honorary consular directory below. Verify the current representation status with the relevant authorities.
    Kazakhstan Başak Sokak No:35, Yeşilyurt, Bakırköy, Istanbul. Verification required.
    Kosovo Vali Konağı Caddesi No:74, Unit 3, Nişantaşı, Şişli, Istanbul.
    Kuwait Reşitpaşa Mahallesi, Değirmentepe Ayhan Sokak No:14, Emirgan, Sarıyer, Istanbul.
    Kyrgyzstan Lamartin Caddesi No:7, Taksim, Beyoğlu, Istanbul.
    Lebanon Teşvikiye Caddesi, Saray Apartmanı No:134/1, Şişli, Istanbul.
    Libya İnönü Caddesi, Miralay Şefik Bey Sokak No:3, Gümüşsuyu, Beyoğlu, Istanbul.
    Malaysia Esentepe Mahallesi, Ali Kaya Sokak No:1/1B, Polat Plaza B Block, Floor 8, Şişli, Istanbul.
    Malta Esentepe Mahallesi, Büyükdere Caddesi No:175, Ferko Signature, A Block, Floor 2, Office 14, Şişli, Istanbul.
    Moldova İnönü Caddesi No:43, Unit 6, Gümüşsuyu, Beyoğlu, Istanbul.
    Mongolia Levent Mahallesi, Levent Caddesi, Güvercin Sokak No:37, Beşiktaş, Istanbul.
    Montenegro Harman Sokak No:5, Harmancı Giz Plaza, Floor 10A, Levent, Istanbul.
    Morocco Levazım Mahallesi, Korukent Sitesi, Beyaz Köşk No:46/2, Beşiktaş, Istanbul.
    Netherlands İstiklal Caddesi No:197, Beyoğlu, Istanbul.
    North Macedonia İnönü Caddesi, Üçler Apartmanı No:20, Floor 2, Unit 3, Gümüşsuyu, Beyoğlu, Istanbul.
    Norway Bilezik Sokak No:4, Fındıklı, Beyoğlu, Istanbul. Verification required.
    Pakistan Güllü Sokak No:20, 3. Levent, Beşiktaş, Istanbul.
    Panama Sahrayıcedit Mahallesi, Batman Sokak No:30, GFY Plaza, Floor 11, Unit 36, Kadıköy, Istanbul.
    Philippines Esentepe Mahallesi, Büyükdere Caddesi No:171, Metrocity Office Building, A Block, Floor 13, Unit 183, Şişli, Istanbul.
    Poland Maslak Mahallesi, Eski Büyükdere Caddesi No:7, GİZ 2000 Plaza, Floor 5, Sarıyer, Istanbul.
    Qatar Yeniköy Mahallesi, Balabandere Caddesi, Hilpark Suites Sitesi No:2, Sarıyer, Istanbul. Verification required.
    Romania Yanarsu Sokak No:42, Narin Sitesi, Etiler, Beşiktaş, Istanbul.
    Russia (Russian Federation) İstiklal Caddesi No:219-225A, Beyoğlu, Istanbul.
    Saudi Arabia Konaklar Mahallesi, Çamlık Caddesi, Akasyalı Sokak No:6, 4. Levent, Beşiktaş, Istanbul.
    Senegal Cumhuriyet Caddesi No:257, Floor 3, Şişli, Istanbul. Verification required.
    Serbia Levent Mahallesi, Sümbül Sokak No:2, Beşiktaş, Istanbul.
    Slovakia Levent Mahallesi, Bambu Sokak No:6, Beşiktaş, Istanbul.
    South Korea (Republic of Korea) Askerocağı Caddesi No:6, Süzer Plaza, Floor 4, Elmadağ, Şişli, Istanbul.
    Spain Karanfil Aralığı Sokak No:16, 1. Levent, Beşiktaş, Istanbul.
    Sudan Seher Yıldızı Sokak No:40, Etiler, Beşiktaş, Istanbul.
    Sweden İstiklal Caddesi No:247, Beyoğlu, Istanbul. The consular entrance is located on the Şah Kulu Bostanı Sokak side.
    Switzerland Büyükdere Caddesi No:173, 1. Levent Plaza, A Block, Floor 3, Levent, Istanbul.
    Syria Maçka Caddesi, Ralli Apartmanı No:37, Floor 3, Teşvikiye, Şişli, Istanbul. Current operating status must be confirmed.
    Tajikistan Şenlikköy Mahallesi, Yeni Bağlar Caddesi, Billur Sokak No:16, Florya, Bakırköy, Istanbul.
    Thailand Kore Şehitleri Caddesi, Mithat Ulu Ünlü Sokak No:12, Zincirlikuyu, Şişli, Istanbul. Verification required.
    Tunisia Gazeteciler Sitesi, Keskinkalem Sokak No:31, Esentepe, Şişli, Istanbul. Verification required.
    Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) 19 Mayıs Mahallesi, Aytekin Kotil Caddesi, Cevahir İş Merkezi, Floor 5, Şişli, Istanbul.
    Turkmenistan Gazi Evrenos Caddesi, Baharistan Sokak No:13, Yeşilköy, Bakırköy, Istanbul.
    Ukraine Adakale Sokak No:13, Şenlikköy, Florya, Bakırköy, Istanbul.
    United Arab Emirates Konaklar Mahallesi, Meşeli Sokak No:11, 4. Levent, Beşiktaş, Istanbul.
    United Kingdom Meşrutiyet Caddesi No:42, Tepebaşı, Beyoğlu, Istanbul.
    United States of America İstinye Mahallesi, Kaplıcalar Mevkii No:2, Sarıyer, Istanbul.
    Uzbekistan Şehit Halil İbrahim Caddesi No:23, İstinye, Sarıyer, Istanbul.
    Venezuela Teşvikiye Mahallesi, Hakkı Yeten Caddesi, Terrace Fulya Center No:11/65, Şişli, Istanbul.

    2. Honorary Consulates in Istanbul: Country-by-Country Address Directory

    Honorary consulates represent a separate category of consular offices. Unlike career consular missions, honorary consulates are generally managed by honorary consular officers whose powers are determined by the appointing state.

    They may assist with commercial, cultural and certain consular matters. However, the ability to issue visas, passports, citizenship documents or official certifications cannot be assumed.

    Important verification warning: The following entries include publicly available and historical consular directory records. The current appointment of an honorary consul, the address of the office and the availability of services have not been independently verified for every country.

    Country Honorary Consulate Address Record
    Bahamas Aydıntepe Mahallesi, Tersaneler Caddesi, 50. Sokak No:7, Tuzla, Istanbul.
    Bahrain Fahrettin Kerim Gökay Caddesi No:34, Altunizade, Üsküdar, Istanbul.
    Belize Değirmen Sokak No:18, Nidakule, Floor 21, Kozyatağı, Kadıköy, Istanbul.
    Benin Keresteci Hakkı Sokak No:50, Akbıyık, Cankurtaran, Fatih, Istanbul.
    Bolivia Altan Erbulak Sokak No:3, Floor 2, Mecidiyeköy, Şişli, Istanbul.
    Burkina Faso Eski Büyükdere Caddesi, Ayazağa Yolu, İzgi Plaza, Maslak, Sarıyer, Istanbul.
    Burundi Harmancı Giz Plaza, Floor 15, Levent, Istanbul.
    Cambodia İnönü Caddesi No:53, Işık Apartmanı, Floor 7, Unit 13, Gümüşsuyu, Beyoğlu, Istanbul.
    Cameroon Üniversite Mahallesi, Bağlariçi Caddesi No:29, Avcılar, Istanbul.
    Central African Republic Prof. Dr. Ali Nihat Tarlan Caddesi, Hoffman Plaza, Floor 3, İçerenköy, Ataşehir, Istanbul.
    Chile Bestekar Şevki Bey Sokak No:30, Balmumcu, Beşiktaş, Istanbul.
    Comoros Eski Büyükdere Caddesi, İZ Plaza Giz No:9, Floor 13, Maslak, Sarıyer, Istanbul.
    Cook Islands Yeni Parseller Sokak No:20, K Building, Floors 4-5, Kavacık, Beykoz, Istanbul.
    Congo (Republic of the Congo) Süleyman Seba Caddesi No:77, Kent Apartmanı, Unit 3, Maçka, Şişli, Istanbul.
    Costa Rica Süzer Plaza, Askerocağı Caddesi No:9, Elmadağ, Şişli, Istanbul.
    Dominican Republic Meclis-i Mebusan Caddesi No:31, Murat Han Apartmanı, Floor 6, Fındıklı, Beyoğlu, Istanbul.
    Ecuador Reşitpaşa Mahallesi, Büyükdere Caddesi No:14, Park Plaza, Maslak, Sarıyer, Istanbul.
    Estonia Cumhuriyet Caddesi No:22/24, Elmadağ, Şişli, Istanbul.
    Finland Cumhuriyet Caddesi No:173/7, Adlı Han, Harbiye, Şişli, Istanbul.
    Gabon Barbaros Mahallesi, Ihlamur Sokak, Uphill Court Towers, A1-B Block, Floor 9, Unit 54, Ataşehir, Istanbul.
    Gambia Yıldız Sarayı, Seyir Köşkü, Barbaros Bulvarı, Beşiktaş, Istanbul. Verification required.
    Guatemala Küçük Çamlıca Caddesi No:85/6, Kısıklı, Üsküdar, Istanbul.
    Guyana Meydan Sokak, Veko Giz Plaza, Floor 2, Maslak, Sarıyer, Istanbul.
    Iceland İrfan Caddesi No:19, Orhanlı, Tuzla, Istanbul.
    Jamaica Harbiye Caddesi No:283, Harbiye, Şişli, Istanbul.
    Jordan Balmumcu Mahallesi, Zincirlikuyu Sokak No:3, Unit 155, Beşiktaş, Istanbul.
    Kenya Büyükdere Caddesi No:155/3, Levent, Istanbul.
    Latvia Eski Bağdat Caddesi No:40, Çamlık Çıkmazı No:1, Küçükyalı, Maltepe, Istanbul.
    Lithuania Mimar Sinan Sokak No:21, Seba Ofis Boulevard, D Block, Unit 59, Ayazağa, Sarıyer, Istanbul.
    Maldives Cumhuriyet Caddesi No:257, Floor 3, Harbiye, Şişli, Istanbul.
    Mali Hacı Adil Caddesi, Asma Sokak No:1, 1. Levent, Beşiktaş, Istanbul.
    Mauritania Osmangazi Mahallesi, Yıldızhan Caddesi, Köşe Sokak No:4, Saray İş Merkezi, Sancaktepe, Istanbul.
    Mexico Levent Mahallesi, Levent Caddesi, Lale Sokak No:23, Beşiktaş, Istanbul.
    Monaco Asmalımescit Mahallesi, Oteller Sokak No:8, Floor 2, Beyoğlu, Istanbul.
    Namibia Abdi İpekçi Caddesi No:5/5, Unit 6, Nişantaşı, Şişli, Istanbul.
    New Zealand İnönü Caddesi No:92/3, Taksim, Beyoğlu, Istanbul. Verification required.
    Oman Cumhuriyet Mahallesi, Cumhuriyet Caddesi No:157/4, Seyran Apartmanı, Harbiye, Şişli, Istanbul.
    Paraguay İnönü Mahallesi, Cumhuriyet Caddesi No:69/A, Şişli, Istanbul.
    Peru Tekstilkent, Koza Plaza A Block, Floor 22, Esenler, Istanbul.
    Portugal Meclis-i Mebusan Caddesi No:157, Floor 5, Fındıklı, Beyoğlu, Istanbul.
    Rwanda Etiler Mahallesi, Meydan Sokak, Mermerler Sitesi, B Block, Unit 3, Beşiktaş, Istanbul.
    San Marino Maya Residence, M Block, Unit 13, Etiler, Beşiktaş, Istanbul.
    Seychelles Yapı Kredi Plaza, C Block, Floor 13, Levent, Beşiktaş, Istanbul.
    Singapore Alan Sokak No:4/5, Şaşkınbakkal, Kadıköy, Istanbul. Verification required.
    Slovenia Hacı Reşit Paşa Sokak No:7, Çamlıca, Üsküdar, Istanbul.
    Solomon Islands Süleyman Seba Caddesi No:48, BJK Plaza, A/88, Beşiktaş, Istanbul.
    Somalia Çobançeşme, Kalender Sokak No:8, Bahçelievler, Istanbul. Current status and address verification required.
    South Africa Muallim Naci Caddesi No:69, Ortaköy, Beşiktaş, Istanbul. Verification required.
    Sri Lanka Kaynarca Mahallesi, Bahattin Veled Caddesi No:1, Mavikule Residence, Floor 12, Unit 59, Pendik, Istanbul.
    Tanzania Abdi İpekçi Caddesi No:29, Atid Apartmanı, Floor 2, Unit 4, Nişantaşı, Şişli, Istanbul.
    Trinidad and Tobago Akatlar, Maya Residence, Barclay 12, Unit 1, Beşiktaş, Istanbul.
    Uruguay Muallim Naci Caddesi No:69, Ortaköy, Beşiktaş, Istanbul. Verification required.
    Yemen Halaskargazi Caddesi, Uygar Apartmanı No:43, Floor 5, Harbiye, Şişli, Istanbul.
    Zambia Halaskargazi Caddesi No:43/5, Floor 5, Harbiye, Şişli, Istanbul.

    Other countries, including Barbados, Cabo Verde, Ethiopia, Guinea-Bissau, Luxembourg, Mauritius, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, and Uganda, have appeared in international consular directories with references to Istanbul. However, sufficiently reliable current visiting addresses have not been established for all these entries. Accordingly, no definitive addresses are provided for them.

    3. Are There Foreign Embassies in Istanbul?

    Foreign embassies in Türkiye are generally located in Ankara, the national capital. Istanbul is primarily home to consular missions rather than the principal diplomatic headquarters of foreign states.

    An embassy and a consulate perform different functions under international law. Embassies represent states in their diplomatic relations with the receiving state, while consulates principally carry out consular functions and assist nationals of the sending state.

    These distinctions are reflected in the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of 1961 and the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations of 1963.

    Istanbul also contains historical embassy buildings and diplomatic residences. However, the historical designation of a building does not necessarily reflect its present diplomatic status.

    4. What Services Do Foreign Consulates in Istanbul Provide?

    Foreign consulates provide services according to the legislation of their respective countries and the powers assigned to individual missions.

    Common consular services include passport issuance and renewal, emergency travel documents, visa applications, birth registration, marriage-related formalities, nationality and citizenship procedures, notarization, powers of attorney, document certification and assistance to citizens abroad.

    Consular offices may also provide information or assistance concerning detained nationals, international family matters, inheritance documents and other cross-border legal issues, subject to the limits of applicable law.

    It is important to distinguish services performed directly by a consulate from procedures administered by immigration authorities, courts, notaries or private visa application centers.

    5. Powers of Attorney Issued Abroad and Their Use in Türkiye

    Foreign nationals and Turkish citizens residing abroad frequently need to authorize lawyers or other representatives to carry out legal procedures in Türkiye.

    Depending on the circumstances, a power of attorney may be prepared before a competent foreign notary or another authorized authority, including a consular officer where permitted by the applicable legal framework.

    The validity and acceptance of a foreign power of attorney in Türkiye depend on several factors, including the form of the document, the authority before which it was executed, applicable international conventions, authentication requirements and the Turkish rules governing the intended transaction.

    Special attention should be given to powers of attorney intended for real estate transactions, litigation, company formation, inheritance matters, citizenship applications and administrative proceedings.

    Some transactions require express or specifically worded authority. A broadly drafted general power of attorney may not satisfy the relevant legal requirements.

    For this reason, it is advisable to determine the intended legal procedures and the requirements of the Turkish receiving authority before executing the document abroad.

    6. Apostille, Consular Legalization and Recognition of Foreign Documents in Türkiye

    Foreign public documents intended for use in Türkiye may require authentication depending on their country of origin, the type of document and the applicable international agreements.

    The Hague Convention of 5 October 1961 Abolishing the Requirement of Legalisation for Foreign Public Documents establishes the apostille system between contracting states for documents falling within its scope.

    An apostille certifies the authenticity of the signature, the capacity in which the person signing the document acted and, where appropriate, the identity of the seal or stamp. It does not establish the substantive truth of the document’s contents.

    Where the apostille system does not apply, a chain of authentication involving relevant public authorities, foreign ministries or consular authorities may be necessary.

    Furthermore, documents written in a foreign language may require a certified Turkish translation and, depending on the procedure, notarization or other formalities.

    There is no single procedure applicable to every foreign country and every document. The legal requirements must be assessed individually.

    7. Consular Procedures, Turkish Citizenship and Immigration Law

    Foreign nationals who live, invest, work or maintain family relationships in Türkiye may encounter legal matters involving both Turkish institutions and foreign consular missions.

    These matters may include Turkish citizenship by investment, naturalization, citizenship status disputes, administrative proceedings affecting citizenship, residence permits, deportation decisions, international protection, family registration and documentation concerning nationality.

    Turkish citizenship procedures are principally governed by Turkish Citizenship Law No. 5901 and relevant implementing regulations.

    Foreign consulates do not replace the competent Turkish administrative authorities or courts in determining rights and obligations under Turkish law.

    Nevertheless, consular documentation can be relevant to establishing a person’s nationality, obtaining travel documents, verifying civil status or supporting evidence in administrative and judicial proceedings.

    In matters involving nationality disputes, citizenship cancellation or withdrawal, criminal investigations related to investment transactions, or immigration restrictions, the interaction between Turkish law, foreign law and applicable international agreements may require specialized legal analysis.

    8. How to Book a Consular Appointment in Istanbul

    Appointment procedures differ among foreign consular missions. Some accept appointments through official online portals, while others require applications through designated visa centers or prior contact with consular personnel.

    Before visiting a consulate in Istanbul, applicants should confirm the current address, jurisdiction, appointment requirements, identification documents, applicable fees, payment methods, translation requirements and public opening hours.

    Foreign consulates may observe both Turkish public holidays and national holidays of the sending state.

    Applicants seeking visa services should also determine whether the relevant foreign state accepts applications directly at its consulate or through an authorized external service provider.

    Traveling to a previously published address without confirming current arrangements may result in unnecessary delays or missed appointments.

    9. Frequently Asked Questions About Consulates in Istanbul

    Where are the foreign embassies in Türkiye?

    Most foreign embassies in Türkiye are located in Ankara. Istanbul primarily hosts consulates general, consulates and honorary consular offices.

    Which districts of Istanbul have the most consulates?

    Beşiktaş, Şişli, Beyoğlu and Sarıyer are among the districts with the highest concentration of foreign consular missions. Other representations can also be found in Bakırköy, Fatih, Kadıköy and additional districts.

    Where is the US Consulate General in Istanbul?

    The United States Consulate General in Istanbul is located at İstinye Mahallesi, Kaplıcalar Mevkii No:2, Sarıyer, Istanbul, Türkiye.

    Where is the German Consulate General in Istanbul?

    The German Consulate General is located at İnönü Caddesi No:10, Gümüşsuyu, Beyoğlu, Istanbul.

    Where is the British Consulate General in Istanbul?

    The British Consulate General is located at Meşrutiyet Caddesi No:42, Tepebaşı, Beyoğlu, Istanbul.

    Where is the Chinese Consulate General in Istanbul?

    The Chinese Consulate General is located at Memduhpaşa Yalısı, Mısırlı Caddesi No:6/8, Kireçburnu, Sarıyer, Istanbul.

    Where is the Russian Consulate General in Istanbul?

    The Consulate General of the Russian Federation is located at İstiklal Caddesi No:219-225A, Beyoğlu, Istanbul.

    Where is the Iranian Consulate General in Istanbul?

    The Consulate General of Iran is listed at Ankara Caddesi No:1, Cağaloğlu, Fatih, Istanbul.

    Can I visit a consulate in Istanbul without an appointment?

    This depends on the individual consulate and the type of service required. Many consulates operate appointment-based systems. Applicants should consult the mission’s official website before visiting.

    What is the difference between a consulate general and an honorary consulate?

    A consulate general is ordinarily headed by a career consular officer, while an honorary consulate is managed by a person appointed to carry out specific consular functions. The authority of an honorary consul may be considerably more limited.

    Can honorary consulates issue visas or passports?

    Not necessarily. Their powers depend on the laws and decisions of the sending state. Applicants should verify the exact services available from the relevant office.

    Are documents issued by foreign consulates automatically valid in Türkiye?

    Not in every case. Their acceptance may depend on the nature of the document, international conventions, authentication requirements, translation rules and the intended legal procedure.

    Do I need a lawyer for consular procedures?

    A lawyer is not legally required for every consular procedure. However, legal assistance may be appropriate for citizenship disputes, immigration matters, foreign powers of attorney, property transactions, inheritance, international commercial matters and administrative or judicial proceedings.

    10. Official Sources and Verification of Consular Addresses

    Foreign consular offices may relocate, suspend public services, modify their jurisdiction or change appointment arrangements. The most reliable approach is to consult the current official information provided by the relevant government or diplomatic mission.

    The following official resources may assist with verification:

    Editorial note: This article is intended as a comprehensive general directory, not an official register certifying the current status of every listed mission. Certain entries, particularly honorary consulates, are based on public directory records and require further official verification.

    11. Legal Assistance for Foreign Nationals in Istanbul

    International legal matters frequently require coordination between foreign consulates, Turkish public authorities, notaries, courts and administrative bodies.

    TD Law Firm provides legal services concerning Turkish citizenship, immigration law, international private law, foreign powers of attorney, recognition and use of foreign documents, real estate transactions and related administrative and judicial proceedings.

    Legal assistance may include reviewing documentation, assessing the applicable Turkish legal requirements, preparing submissions, communicating with competent authorities where authorized and representing clients in relevant legal proceedings.

    Attorney Murat Can Dolğun

    TD Law Firm | TD Hukuk ve Danışmanlık

    Istanbul Bar Association, Türkiye

    Practice Areas:

    Turkish Citizenship Law | Immigration Law | Private International Law | Administrative Law | International Legal Transactions

    Office Address:

    World Trade Center (Dünya Ticaret Merkezi)

    A2 Block, Office No:206

    Yeşilköy, Bakırköy, Istanbul, Türkiye

    Telephone:
    +90 212 299 44 22

    Office Hours:

    Monday-Friday, 09:00-17:00 (Türkiye Time)

    Websites:
    www.dolgun.av.tr
    www.td-lawfirm.com

    Legal Disclaimer: This article was prepared by Attorney Murat Can Dolğun for general informational purposes. It does not constitute individualized legal advice or establish an attorney-client relationship. Consular information and legal requirements should be verified with the relevant competent authorities before taking action.

  • Turkish Citizenship Revocation 2026: Latest Updates, 1,070 Cases and Legal Remedies

    Turkish Citizenship Revocation 2026: Latest Updates, 1,070 Cases and Legal Remedies

    Last updated: October 8, 2026

    Author: Attorney Murat Can Dolğun – Istanbul Bar Association

    Legal Analysis | Turkish Citizenship Law | Citizenship by Investment | Criminal Investigations | Administrative Litigation

    Turkish Citizenship Revocation and Cancellation in 2026: Latest Developments, the 1,070-Person Investigation, 6,134 Citizenship Decisions, and Legal Remedies

    Turkish citizenship acquired through real estate investment is facing an unprecedented level of administrative and criminal scrutiny. Following major investigations initiated in 2025, Turkish authorities announced additional operations in August and September 2026 concerning allegedly fraudulent property valuations, sham real estate transactions, artificial banking arrangements, and irregularities in investment eligibility certificates.

    On September 21, 2026, Turkish authorities announced that an investigation involving 1,070 people, including investors and their family members, had been identified in connection with allegedly irregular citizenship acquisitions. On the same day, the Ministry of Interior reported that citizenship acquisition decisions concerning a total of 6,134 individuals had previously been annulled or withdrawn through various administrative procedures. These figures concern different categories of proceedings and must not be confused. [N4] [N7]

    The most important legal distinction is this: being mentioned in a criminal investigation does not establish that an individual’s Turkish citizenship has been cancelled or withdrawn. Equally, the absence of a notification does not conclusively prove that no administrative decision has been issued.

    For each investor, the legal position must be determined through a separate examination of citizenship records, the acquisition date, historical property valuations, the genuine source and movement of funds, investment eligibility certificates, relevant administrative decisions, criminal proceedings, and the citizenship status of family members.

    This article examines the developments reported up to October 8, 2026. It is based on publicly accessible official statements, Turkish legislation, decisions of the Council of State (Danıştay), academic scholarship, and anonymised observations concerning legal practice.

    Verified official information is expressly distinguished from verbal reports that have not been independently confirmed. No unverified information is presented as an established court decision or a definitive determination concerning an individual investor.

    Table of Contents

    1. What Happened in the Turkish Citizenship Investigations During 2025 and 2026?

    The investigations into Turkish citizenship acquired through real estate investment did not begin in September 2026. They form part of a series of investigations concerning allegedly irregular citizenship acquisitions, suspicious real estate transactions, financial arrangements, and property valuation practices.

    September 2025: An Earlier Major Citizenship Investigation

    On September 24, 2025, Turkish authorities conducted an operation across 19 provinces, coordinated from Istanbul, concerning allegations that Turkish citizenship had been obtained through sham property sales and fraudulent financial arrangements.

    Subsequent news reporting referred to 451 foreign investors and 1,198 citizenship acquisitions when family members were included. The allegations concerned the absence of genuine foreign currency inflows, artificial financial transactions, and property sales allegedly structured to satisfy citizenship requirements without a genuine underlying investment. [N1] [N2]

    It is important to distinguish the findings and allegations of investigating authorities from criminal responsibility established by a final court judgment.

    August 4, 2026: Investigation Involving 687 Citizenship Acquisitions

    On August 4, 2026, the Turkish Ministry of Justice announced an investigation involving allegations that properties of relatively low actual value had been presented as more valuable through inaccurate valuation reports and that sham transactions had been used to facilitate citizenship acquisitions.

    The authorities announced that legal procedures had been initiated concerning the possible cancellation of citizenship for 687 people. They also referred to an alleged failure to achieve approximately TRY 2.5 billion in genuine foreign currency inflows and the application of measures affecting various assets. [N3]

    The announcement of a legal process for cancelling citizenship is not identical to proof that a separate, final and duly notified cancellation decision already exists for every person concerned.

    On August 7, 2026, Anadolu Ajansı reported that 32 suspects had been placed in pre-trial detention and 48 others were subject to judicial-control measures. These are measures within criminal procedure, not findings of guilt. [N5]

    September 21, 2026: Second-Wave Operation Involving 1,070 People

    On September 21, 2026, another operation was announced concerning property transactions involving Gül İnşaat AŞ, Beyaz İnşaat and LİV İnşaat.

    According to the official statements, transactions involving 734 foreign purchasers had been examined and 274 sales were identified by the authorities as allegedly sham transactions. The investigation was said to involve 1,070 people, including investors and family members. [N4]

    September 25, 2026: Further Judicial Measures

    On September 25, 2026, Anadolu Ajansı reported that 33 suspects had been detained pending trial, 20 were subjected to house-arrest-type judicial control, and 21 were subjected to other judicial-control measures. [N6]

    As of October 8, 2026, these are among the latest material procedural developments that can be verified through the public sources examined for this article.

    However, the absence of a more recent public announcement does not establish that criminal prosecutors, administrative authorities or the relevant government institutions have ceased processing individual files.

    2. Have 6,134 People Already Lost Their Turkish Citizenship?

    The Ministry of Interior statement reported on September 21, 2026 provided cumulative figures concerning administrative decisions affecting citizenship acquired through investment and other exceptional citizenship procedures.

    Category of administrative action Principal investors Total including family members
    Annulments associated with cancelled investment eligibility certificates 1,150 5,391
    Withdrawal decisions involving public-order or national-security considerations 263 743
    Total reported by the Ministry 1,413 6,134
    Investors whose eligibility certificates were cancelled from February 11, 2026 onwards 458 1,393

    Sources: Ministry of Interior statement reported by Anadolu Ajansı and TRT Haber, September 21, 2026. The 1,393-person figure in the final row must not be added separately to the cumulative total without establishing the relevant overlap. [N4] [N7]

    These figures demonstrate that the Turkish authorities have publicly reported the adoption of substantial numbers of citizenship annulment and withdrawal decisions.

    Nevertheless, the figures should not be interpreted as establishing that every one of the 1,070 people identified in the latest investigation had already received a definitive administrative decision on September 21, 2026.

    It is also necessary to distinguish an administrative decision being issued from that decision being notified to the person concerned, becoming the subject of judicial review, or being upheld by a final judgment.

    The number of people identified in an investigation, the number of administrative decisions issued, and the number of decisions that have become final are legally different matters.

    3. What Exactly Is the 1,070-Person Turkish Citizenship Investigation?

    The investigation announced on September 21, 2026 concerns alleged irregularities in real estate transactions used to obtain Turkish citizenship through investment.

    The authorities referred to analyses of land registry records, banking information, financial investigation reports, and expert assessments.

    Investigation category Reported figure
    Property sales examined 734
    Sales alleged by the authorities to be sham transactions 274
    People identified as having acquired citizenship 1,070
    Principal investors 263
    Family members 807
    People who acquired citizenship at the date of the principal decision 1,015
    Children who reportedly acquired citizenship after that decision 55
    Additional people associated with citizenship application processes 11

    Source: Ministry of Interior statement of September 21, 2026, reported by Anadolu Ajansı. [N4]

    The investigation reportedly concerns allegations that the foreign currency needed for citizenship was not genuinely introduced into Türkiye, that transaction flows were artificially created through seller-related financing or intermediary companies, and that certain valuation reports overstated property values.

    These matters are highly relevant to the statutory requirements for citizenship by investment. However, allegations about an investment scheme must not be treated as conclusive evidence that every individual investor knowingly participated in wrongdoing.

    Of particular importance is the fact that only 274 of the 734 examined transactions were described as sham sales in the official announcement.

    The fact that a purchaser acquired property from a company under investigation does not, by itself, prove that the purchaser’s particular property transaction was sham, fraudulent or legally insufficient.

    4. Which Construction Companies Are Mentioned in the Citizenship Investigations?

    According to the September 21, 2026 statement reported by Anadolu Ajansı, the first wave of the 2026 investigation concerned transactions associated with Babacan İnşaat.

    The second wave concerned selected real estate transactions associated with Gül İnşaat AŞ, Beyaz İnşaat and LİV İnşaat. [N4]

    The mention of these companies in an official investigation must not be understood as proof that every property sold by these companies, every development project, or every independent residential unit was involved in an unlawful transaction.

    Each relevant property must be assessed by reference to its land registry information, individual unit identification, actual purchase price, historical valuation, payment records and the applicable citizenship requirements.

    Furthermore, lists of construction projects, apartment numbers or investors circulating on social media require particular caution. Unless independently verified through reliable official documents, such lists should not be presented as complete or authoritative records of affected citizenship cases.

    This article does not treat unverified project lists as established facts.

    5. Unconfirmed Verbal Information Concerning Investigation Procedures in October 2026

    Beyond official public announcements, various observations may arise during legal research, enquiries with relevant public authorities, and discussions concerning the practical administration of individual citizenship and criminal investigation files.

    Such information can be useful in identifying issues that require further investigation. However, statements received verbally are not equivalent to formal instructions, written administrative decisions, or judicial rulings.

    Important notice: The following observations concern information reportedly communicated verbally during the first days of October 2026. They have not been independently confirmed as general official policies applicable to every investigation. They are subject to change at any time.

    5.1. Reports of Temporary Suspension of Certain Police Interviews

    According to certain verbal accounts obtained in connection with the practical administration of investigation files, some planned police interviews were reportedly suspended or postponed pending further instructions.

    There have also been accounts of individuals attending law enforcement offices but not having their statements formally taken.

    These accounts must not be interpreted as evidence that all interviews in all citizenship-related investigations have been suspended or that the prosecutor’s office has issued a general nationwide order preventing further statements from being taken.

    Nor should they be understood as removing any individual’s obligation to comply with a lawful summons or other applicable criminal procedure requirements.

    The current position must be verified individually, taking account of the specific investigation, any new prosecutor’s instructions, the person’s legal status, and any outstanding summons or judicial measures.

    5.2. Reports Concerning the Separation of Investigation Files

    Another issue referred to in practical accounts is the possibility that matters connected to a broad citizenship investigation may be separated into different criminal files.

    Under Turkish criminal procedure, connected investigations may be separated or combined where the relevant legal requirements are satisfied.

    However, reports that a particular investor has been transferred to a different investigation, or that a new file has been created, cannot be accepted as established facts without examination of the relevant official records.

    In practice, the existence of a criminal investigation must be established for the particular individual rather than inferred solely from a developer’s name or the existence of another related proceeding.

    5.3. Different Stages of Administrative Citizenship Proceedings

    Investors connected to the same construction company or development project may be subject to different administrative stages.

    For one individual, the only available information may concern a criminal investigation into a seller or intermediary. Another person’s investment eligibility certificate may have been placed under review. A third person may already be subject to an administrative annulment or withdrawal decision.

    The fact that these processes may progress at different times does not permit a general conclusion concerning every investor in the same development.

    Continuous verification: All verbally reported observations in this section must be reassessed whenever reliable written information becomes available. These observations do not constitute an assurance that interviews will not be conducted, that an investigation has ended, or that citizenship will be retained.

    6. Are All Citizenship Investigations Being Conducted Under a Single Criminal File?

    No general assumption should be made that all citizenship investigations announced during 2025 and 2026 are being conducted under one prosecutor’s investigation number or one criminal court case.

    Different operations have involved different dates, companies, property transactions, suspects and alleged offences.

    A criminal investigation may remain at the preliminary evidence-gathering stage, while a connected or earlier matter may already have resulted in an indictment or court proceedings.

    Similarly, an investigation may involve the owners or managers of a construction company without every purchaser being formally designated as a suspect.

    For an accurate assessment, the relevant questions include whether an individual investigation exists, the identity of the investigating prosecutor’s office, the person’s procedural status, whether an interview has been requested, whether any judicial measure has been imposed, whether files have been separated or combined, and whether an indictment has been filed.

    The confidentiality of an ongoing criminal investigation can limit public access to detailed information. Therefore, the absence of a new press report is not proof that a particular investigation has been closed.

    A proper legal assessment of Turkish citizenship proceedings requires a clear distinction between Article 31 and Article 40 of Turkish Citizenship Law No. 5901.

    These mechanisms are sometimes discussed together under the broad expression “Turkish citizenship revocation”. However, they involve different legal grounds and must not be treated as interchangeable.

    7.1. Annulment of Citizenship – Article 31

    Article 31 provides for the annulment of a decision granting Turkish citizenship where that decision resulted from the individual’s false declaration or concealment of important matters relevant to the acquisition of citizenship.

    Accordingly, the individual’s conduct, the nature of the alleged false declaration or concealment, and its relationship to the citizenship acquisition decision are central to the legal analysis.

    Alleged wrongdoing by a property developer, broker or valuation expert does not automatically establish that the investor personally made a false declaration or knowingly concealed a material fact.

    7.2. Withdrawal of Citizenship Acquisition Decisions – Article 40

    Article 40 concerns the withdrawal of decisions relating to the acquisition or loss of Turkish citizenship where it is subsequently established that the necessary legal conditions were not satisfied or that the decision was issued more than once.

    Unlike Article 31, this provision is not confined to cases involving an applicant’s false statement or concealment.

    An investor may therefore face an administrative argument that the objective legal conditions for citizenship were never satisfied, even where the investor denies fraud and maintains that the property was genuinely purchased.

    However, the administration must still act within the law and establish the factual and legal grounds supporting the withdrawal decision. The existence and sufficiency of the evidence are matters capable of judicial review. [J1] [A1]

    Legal issue Article 31 – Annulment Article 40 – Withdrawal
    Primary legal ground False declaration or concealment of material facts by the individual Acquisition without the required legal conditions, or a duplicate decision
    Applicant’s conduct Relevant to the statutory ground Objective non-compliance may be decisive independently of personal fraud
    Legal effect Article 32 provides retrospective effect from the original decision date Article 66 of the implementing Regulation provides invalidity from the original decision date
    Family members Linked citizenship acquisitions may be affected under Article 32 The legal foundation of related citizenship decisions requires separate assessment
    Principal legal argument Absence of the required false declaration, concealment or causal connection Existence of all legally required conditions at the relevant acquisition date

    This distinction is examined in greater detail in our earlier academic-style publication, Annulment and Withdrawal of Turkish Citizenship Acquired Through Investment.

    Recent academic scholarship has also examined the relationship between investment conditions and the appropriate legal basis for subsequent administrative intervention. [A2]

    8. How Can I Find Out Whether My Turkish Citizenship Has Been Cancelled or Withdrawn?

    An accurate determination of Turkish citizenship status requires an examination of current official records and any administrative decisions issued in the individual’s case.

    Being named in news reports, owning property in a development under investigation or being associated with a company mentioned by the authorities does not establish that a person’s Turkish citizenship has been withdrawn.

    Equally, continued physical possession of a Turkish identity card or passport, access to an e-Devlet account, or the absence of a notification does not necessarily provide conclusive proof of current legal citizenship status.

    Situation Legal significance
    The developer is under criminal investigation This alone does not establish cancellation of the investor’s citizenship
    The investor’s name appears in an investigation Criminal status and administrative citizenship status must be examined separately
    The investment eligibility certificate has been cancelled This may create a serious administrative risk, but the citizenship decision must also be reviewed
    A citizenship annulment or withdrawal decision has been issued The date, legal ground, scope and notification must be established
    The decision has been formally notified Judicial time limits and urgent legal remedies must be assessed
    No official information has yet been obtained Neither continuation nor termination of citizenship can be concluded with certainty

    The relevant assessment may require enquiries with the Directorate General of Civil Registration and Citizenship Affairs (Nüfus ve Vatandaşlık İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü), the authorities responsible for investment eligibility, and other competent institutions.

    It is particularly important to distinguish the date on which an administrative decision was made from the date on which that decision was legally notified.

    This distinction may affect the calculation of judicial deadlines and the availability of procedural remedies.

    9. I Made a Genuine Investment and Committed No Fraud. Can My Turkish Citizenship Still Be Withdrawn?

    A recurring concern among affected investors is that they genuinely purchased their properties, transferred the required funds through their own bank accounts, received registered ownership and never received any refund from the seller or developer.

    Such facts may be extremely important to a legal defence.

    Banking records showing genuine payment, evidence that the seller received the purchase price, the absence of a circular movement of funds, and the continuation of property ownership may support the position that a real investment took place.

    Nevertheless, the existence of a genuine property transaction and compliance with every legal condition for citizenship are not necessarily identical questions.

    For example, an investor may have genuinely paid for an apartment while the authorities subsequently allege that its actual value at the relevant acquisition date was below the statutory citizenship threshold.

    Three separate matters must therefore be examined:

    1. Whether the property purchase and payment transactions were genuine.
    2. Whether the investment satisfied the legal requirements applicable at the relevant date.
    3. Whether the investor knowingly participated in any false declaration, concealment or fraudulent transaction.

    Good faith is legally relevant, but it does not guarantee that every citizenship withdrawal decision can be successfully challenged. Equally, an allegation of misconduct against a developer does not establish personal criminal liability on the part of every purchaser.

    Under Turkish criminal law, individual responsibility must be assessed by reference to the elements of the alleged offence and the conduct attributable to the particular person.

    Under administrative law, the relevant citizenship decision must be evaluated by reference to its statutory basis, factual grounds and applicable legal safeguards.

    10. Can an Old Property Valuation Report Be Re-examined? What If a New Valuation Is Lower?

    Retrospective property valuation has become a central issue in the 2026 investigations.

    The authorities may examine valuation reports prepared when citizenship was originally acquired and may obtain new expert evidence concerning the property’s value at that earlier date.

    However, a property’s market value in 2026 is not necessarily the same as its market value at the time of the investment.

    The relevant question is whether the original investment satisfied the applicable requirements at the legally relevant time.

    10.1. The USD 250,000 and USD 400,000 Thresholds

    The property investment threshold for Turkish citizenship was reduced to USD 250,000 on September 19, 2018. It was subsequently increased to USD 400,000 with effect from June 13, 2022, subject to the applicable transitional provisions.

    Consequently, a qualifying property investment made in 2021 should not simply be assessed by applying the later USD 400,000 requirement retrospectively. The relevant dates of the investment, contractual undertaking, application and eligibility documentation must be assessed under the law and transitional provisions applicable to the particular transaction. [L2]

    10.2. Does a Valuation of an Entire Project Establish the Value of Every Apartment?

    Not necessarily.

    An expert report concerning an entire development, parent parcel or construction project does not automatically establish the historical value of every independent residential unit.

    Relevant factors may include the unit’s location, block, floor, net and gross area, orientation, legal status, construction stage, view, property characteristics and comparable transactions at the relevant date.

    Special attention may be required where apartment numbers used during the construction stage differ from the unit numbers subsequently registered following the establishment of condominium ownership.

    Any discrepancy between project documentation and land registry descriptions should be investigated before conclusions are drawn from a general valuation report.

    10.3. Could Obtaining a New Expert Report Create Legal Risks?

    A new technical report may assist an investor in challenging a disputed valuation. However, its scope, methodology, evidential limitations and potential findings should be considered before commissioning the work.

    If an independent report concludes that a property’s historical value was below the threshold applicable at the relevant time, that conclusion may become a significant issue in an administrative dispute under Article 40.

    A properly designed legal strategy should therefore begin with an assessment of existing evidence, including the original valuation report, banking records, expert conclusions, development records and comparable historical transactions.

    Where justified, an independent expert opinion, judicial preservation of evidence or court-appointed expert examination may be considered.

    The purpose of expert evidence must be to establish the property’s actual historical value through a transparent and verifiable methodology, rather than to manufacture a preferred valuation result.

    11. What Do the Important 2026 Council of State Decisions Mean for Citizenship Revocation Cases?

    Two decisions of the Turkish Council of State (Danıştay), Tenth Chamber, issued in February 2026 provide important guidance concerning the judicial review of administrative decisions withdrawing Turkish citizenship.

    The decisions concern different factual circumstances and should not be treated as producing a single automatic outcome for all investment-based citizenship disputes.

    11.1. Council of State, Tenth Chamber, February 5, 2026, E.2024/405, K.2026/361

    This case concerned a person who acquired Turkish citizenship through investment. The administration subsequently cancelled the investment eligibility certificate after identifying irregularities concerning foreign currency purchase documents.

    The Council of State examined the withdrawal of citizenship under Article 40 of Law No. 5901 and found no illegality in the administrative withdrawal decision, having regard to the failure to satisfy the necessary legal requirements. [J1]

    The decision is important because the original approval of a citizenship application does not necessarily prevent the administration from subsequently withdrawing the decision where it is legally established that the necessary conditions were absent from the outset.

    It also demonstrates the significance of examining the investment eligibility certificate, the underlying financial documents and any available challenge to the cancellation of that certificate.

    11.2. Council of State, Tenth Chamber, February 4, 2026, E.2024/3835, K.2026/324

    This case concerned a citizenship withdrawal decision based on public-order and national-security considerations.

    Having examined the reasons and supporting material relied upon by the administration, the Council of State concluded that the grounds necessary to justify withdrawal had not been sufficiently established and annulled the relevant part of the administrative decision. [J2]

    This was not a property valuation dispute. Its significance lies in the requirement that an administrative decision affecting citizenship must have a legally sustainable and sufficiently substantiated basis.

    11.3. What Can Be Learned from These Two Judgments?

    These decisions should be read together.

    The first demonstrates that a withdrawal decision may be upheld where the statutory conditions for citizenship were not satisfied and the relevant facts have been established.

    The second demonstrates that the administration’s asserted grounds may be subjected to meaningful judicial scrutiny and that a withdrawal decision may be annulled where the necessary basis is not sufficiently established.

    Accordingly, neither the proposition that all citizenship withdrawal decisions are unlawful nor the proposition that all such decisions are immune from judicial challenge is legally sustainable.

    The decisive issues are the applicable legal provision, the factual position at the time of acquisition, the evidence relied upon by the authorities, and the legality of the particular administrative decision.

    12. What Happens to My Wife, Husband and Children If My Turkish Citizenship Is Cancelled?

    Article 32 of Turkish Citizenship Law No. 5901 addresses the consequences of an annulment decision for spouses and children who acquired Turkish citizenship in connection with the principal person’s acquisition.

    However, it would be legally inaccurate to assume that every family member must necessarily have exactly the same legal position.

    The manner and date of citizenship acquisition, whether citizenship was acquired derivatively or independently, and the relevant provisions of Turkish nationality law must be examined for each individual.

    The September 21, 2026 official statement identified 807 family members among the 1,070 persons concerned and separately referred to 55 children who acquired Turkish citizenship after the original citizenship decision. [N4]

    This distinction illustrates why family members should not be assessed solely by reference to the principal investor’s file.

    Particular care is required in cases involving children who acquired Turkish citizenship by birth, children whose nationality was connected to a parent’s subsequent naturalisation, or family members who may have acquired citizenship on a separate legal basis.

    The potential retrospective legal effects of withdrawal and annulment decisions must also be examined in light of the applicable legislation.

    13. Does a Seizure Order on My Property Mean My Turkish Citizenship Has Been Revoked?

    No. A seizure or freezing measure recorded against a property in TAKBİS or the land registry does not, by itself, establish that the owner’s Turkish citizenship has been annulled or withdrawn.

    A criminal-procedure measure concerning property and an administrative decision concerning citizenship are distinct legal acts.

    When a seizure measure is identified, the legal assessment should determine which judicial authority ordered it, the offences or facts relied upon, the specific property affected, the statutory basis of the measure, and the applicable objection procedures.

    The rights and safeguards provided under the Turkish Code of Criminal Procedure must be considered.

    Article 33 of Turkish Citizenship Law No. 5901 also contains special provisions concerning the liquidation of assets in certain cases involving annulled citizenship.

    However, the annulment of citizenship should not be treated as automatically transferring ownership of every property to the state or as producing identical asset consequences in every case.

    Whether asset liquidation is legally required must be assessed in accordance with the applicable statutory provisions and the relevant administrative decision.

    In addition, the legal effect of judicial proceedings against an annulment decision on the liquidation process requires separate examination.

    Continued registration of a property in the investor’s name, the existence of a criminal seizure measure, and the investor’s citizenship status are three legally different questions.

    14. What Criminal Charges Could Arise from a Turkish Citizenship by Investment Investigation?

    The investigations publicly announced in 2025 and 2026 have referred to several categories of alleged criminal conduct.

    Depending on the relevant facts, allegations may concern establishing, managing or participating in a criminal organisation, migrant smuggling, document forgery, false statements in the preparation of official documents, or aggravated fraud involving public institutions. [N4] [N6]

    However, the offences listed in a prosecutor’s public statement do not necessarily apply to every foreign investor whose property transaction is being examined.

    Criminal responsibility must be determined individually, having regard to the elements of the alleged offence, the person’s conduct, intent, knowledge, participation and the available evidence.

    For example, an allegation that a valuation expert knowingly prepared a false report does not independently establish that the purchaser knew of the falsity or participated in its preparation.

    Relevant defence materials may include purchase contracts, bank records, foreign exchange documentation, evidence concerning the source of funds, correspondence with the seller, real estate valuation reports, and documents submitted in the original citizenship application.

    Criminal proceedings and citizenship proceedings may influence each other, but they remain legally distinct.

    A criminal investigation being discontinued does not automatically eliminate every possible administrative issue concerning the original citizenship conditions.

    Conversely, an administrative decision withdrawing citizenship does not establish that the person has committed a criminal offence.

    15. I Live Outside Türkiye. What Should I Do Before Travelling to Istanbul?

    Many investors who acquired Turkish citizenship through real estate investment have subsequently continued living in other countries.

    Some may first learn about an investigation through public news reports, social media, or information concerning the developer from whom they purchased an apartment.

    Before travelling to Türkiye, individuals facing a concrete concern may consider obtaining an appropriate legal assessment of their current citizenship status and any known judicial measures affecting them.

    Relevant enquiries may concern the existence of an investigation, the person’s procedural status, any summons, arrest or compulsory appearance order, and the current validity of citizenship and identity documents.

    Where citizenship has already been annulled or withdrawn, immigration-law considerations may become important, including the person’s other nationality, legal residence position, possible statelessness concerns, and any deportation or administrative detention measures.

    Depending on the nature of the required legal acts, it may be possible to authorise a Turkish lawyer through a power of attorney executed before a Turkish diplomatic or consular authority abroad.

    However, the applicable identification and documentary requirements should be confirmed with the relevant consular authority.

    There is no reliable universal answer to the question of which passport an individual should use when travelling to Türkiye while a citizenship-related dispute is pending.

    The person must act consistently with their lawful current status and provide accurate information to the competent authorities.

    16. Which Documents Are Necessary to Assess the Risk of Turkish Citizenship Revocation?

    A comprehensive assessment should not rely exclusively on a title deed or a single bank receipt.

    Investment-based citizenship cases may require a coordinated examination of the administrative acquisition process, financial transactions, real estate records, valuation evidence, and any related criminal proceedings.

    Document category Purpose of the examination
    Original citizenship acquisition decision and records Establish the date, legal basis and family relationships
    Title deeds and historical land registry records Verify ownership, transaction history and the property unit
    Property purchase contracts and receipts Determine the actual contractual price and payment arrangements
    Foreign and Turkish bank statements Trace the source and movement of funds
    Foreign currency purchase certificates Examine compliance with the currency requirements applicable at the time
    Original and subsequent valuation reports Assess the property’s historical value and possible discrepancies
    Investment eligibility certificate Determine the basis and current status of the administrative eligibility assessment
    Developer and intermediary correspondence Identify the investor’s knowledge, instructions and communications
    Family members’ citizenship documents Establish derivative or independent citizenship acquisition
    Administrative notifications and institutional correspondence Identify decisions, notification dates and judicial deadlines
    Criminal investigation and judicial documents Establish the scope of any allegations or protective measures

    Articles 2 and 46 of the Turkish Attorneyship Law No. 1136 provide a framework for lawyers’ access to certain files and documents.

    Nevertheless, access without a power of attorney, obtaining copies, access to confidential investigation records and disclosure of personal civil registry information may be subject to statutory restrictions and institutional requirements.

    These rights should not be interpreted as giving unrestricted access to every confidential document or every individual’s personal records without appropriate legal authority.

    17. A Legal Roadmap for Investors Facing Turkish Citizenship Annulment or Withdrawal

    An effective legal response requires more than submitting a single petition or waiting for a notification from the authorities.

    The administrative, criminal, financial, real estate and, where necessary, immigration-law aspects of the case should be assessed as part of a coherent legal strategy.

    Step 1: Establish the Current Citizenship Status

    The first stage is to determine the date and legal basis of citizenship acquisition, the status of the investment eligibility certificate, and whether any annulment or withdrawal decision has been issued.

    If such a decision exists, its date, legal basis, notification and present procedural status must be established.

    Step 2: Identify the Criminal Investigation and Its Scope

    Enquiries should determine whether the investor is personally involved in a criminal investigation, whether the person is identified as a suspect, whether an interview has been requested, and whether any judicial protective measure exists.

    Any related or separated files should be considered where relevant and lawfully accessible.

    Step 3: Reconstruct the Investment Transaction

    The original acquisition process should be documented chronologically, beginning with the purchase agreement and continuing through payment, valuation, registration, eligibility assessment and the citizenship decision.

    This allows the legal requirements applicable at each stage to be assessed accurately.

    Step 4: Verify the Source and Movement of Funds

    A financial review should examine where the funds originated, which accounts were used, whether the required payments were made, whether the seller actually received the money, and whether any direct or indirect refund occurred.

    Where appropriate, documentary evidence may be sought from banks or other competent institutions through lawful procedures.

    Step 5: Examine the Property’s Historical Value

    If the case concerns an allegation of insufficient investment or inflated valuation, technical analysis should focus on the relevant historical valuation date.

    Comparable transactions, the property’s characteristics, the original expert report and any subsequent findings should be evaluated together.

    Step 6: Coordinate Administrative and Criminal Defence

    Statements and documents used in criminal proceedings should be considered alongside submissions made to administrative authorities.

    The objective is to avoid factual inconsistency while respecting the different legal standards, procedural rights and evidential requirements of each proceeding.

    Step 7: Pursue Appropriate Administrative and Judicial Remedies

    Where an annulment or withdrawal decision has already been issued, the appropriate court, filing deadline and possible request for suspension of execution must be determined.

    If the investment eligibility certificate has been separately cancelled, it may be necessary to assess whether that decision requires an independent challenge.

    Any seizure or other criminal-procedure measure should be considered under the relevant procedural rules and objection mechanisms.

    Step 8: Continue Reviewing Material Developments

    Citizenship and criminal files can evolve over time.

    An investigation initially concerning a construction company may subsequently produce evidence concerning specific transactions. An eligibility review may result in a separate administrative decision, and an existing decision may later be notified or challenged.

    For this reason, cases involving a concrete ongoing risk should be reassessed when material new information becomes available.

    18. How Can a Turkish Citizenship Revocation Decision Be Challenged in Court?

    Decisions annulling or withdrawing Turkish citizenship are administrative acts capable of judicial review.

    However, the competent court depends on the authority issuing the challenged decision and the legal nature of the specific administrative act.

    Certain decisions concerning exceptional acquisition or withdrawal of citizenship made by the President of the Republic may fall within the Council of State’s first-instance jurisdiction.

    Other administrative decisions, including certain investment eligibility decisions, may require a separate determination of the competent administrative court.

    18.1. Time Limits for Judicial Review

    Under the general framework of Administrative Procedure Law No. 2577, where no special period applies, the time limit for bringing an action before the Council of State or an administrative court is generally 60 days.

    Nevertheless, the precise time limit must be calculated by reference to the specific act, the lawful notification date, any applicable special rules, and the legal consequences of any administrative application.

    The Council of State’s decision dated December 30, 2025, E.2025/6295, K.2025/7133, illustrates the importance of complying with the applicable judicial filing period. The action considered in that case was rejected because it had not been filed within the relevant time limit. [J3]

    18.2. Can the Court Suspend the Citizenship Decision?

    A claimant may request a suspension of execution where the statutory conditions are satisfied.

    However, filing an annulment action does not automatically suspend the implementation of every administrative decision.

    Article 27 of Law No. 2577 governs the requirements for suspension of execution, including the relevant tests concerning unlawfulness and the consequences of implementation.

    The availability of interim judicial protection must therefore be evaluated on the circumstances of the particular case.

    Where a citizenship withdrawal or annulment decision has been notified, establishing the filing deadline and the need for urgent interim relief should be among the first legal priorities.

    19. Frequently Asked Questions About Turkish Citizenship Revocation in 2026

    1. Has Turkish citizenship been definitively cancelled for all 1,070 people?

    No such general conclusion can be drawn from the September 21, 2026 announcement. The authorities reported identifying the individuals concerned and initiating administrative procedures. This does not establish that separate decisions have been issued, notified or finally upheld for every individual.

    2. Is it true that 6,134 people have had their Turkish citizenship annulled or withdrawn?

    The Ministry of Interior publicly reported that citizenship decisions concerning 5,391 people had been annulled and decisions concerning 743 people had been withdrawn, producing a cumulative total of 6,134 individuals. These figures must be distinguished from the newer 1,070-person investigation.

    3. If my property developer is under investigation, will my citizenship automatically be revoked?

    No. An investigation into the developer does not automatically establish that the purchaser’s citizenship has been revoked or that the purchaser’s transaction was unlawful. The individual’s investment and administrative records require separate examination.

    4. Can my citizenship be withdrawn even though I genuinely paid for the property?

    Yes, a legal risk may still arise if the authorities allege that the objective conditions for citizenship were not satisfied. Genuine payment is an important factor, but the applicable investment requirements must also be examined.

    5. I acquired Turkish citizenship in 2021 through a USD 250,000 investment. Does the USD 400,000 threshold now apply to me?

    Past investments must be evaluated under the law applicable at the legally relevant time, taking account of transitional provisions. The later USD 400,000 threshold should not simply be applied retrospectively to every earlier investment.

    6. I did not prepare the valuation report. Can I still face citizenship withdrawal?

    The fact that the investor did not prepare or knowingly falsify the report may be important under Article 31. However, an allegation that the original objective citizenship conditions were absent may require a separate assessment under Article 40.

    7. Can a new expert report invalidate the original valuation report?

    Not automatically. The dates, methods, comparable sales and characteristics of the property must be assessed before determining the evidential weight of each report.

    8. Can I enter Türkiye if I am mentioned in a criminal citizenship investigation?

    The existence of an investigation is not the same as the existence of an arrest or compulsory appearance order. An informed assessment requires examination of the individual’s current legal status and any relevant judicial measures.

    9. Does possession of a Turkish passport prove that I am still a Turkish citizen?

    Possession of a physical passport alone is not conclusive proof that no subsequent administrative citizenship decision has been made. Current official records should be examined.

    10. If I can access e-Devlet, does that mean my citizenship has not been revoked?

    Access to an electronic government account is not, by itself, a definitive legal determination of citizenship status. The relevant administrative records and decisions must be checked.

    11. Will my spouse and children lose Turkish citizenship if my citizenship is cancelled?

    Linked citizenship acquisitions may be affected under Turkish nationality law. However, the legal basis and date of each family member’s acquisition must be examined individually.

    12. If my apartment is subject to a seizure order, will I lose ownership?

    A criminal seizure measure and the termination of ownership are different legal matters. The order’s grounds, scope, duration and available objection procedures must be assessed, together with any separately applicable citizenship-related asset provisions.

    13. Can I file a lawsuit against a Turkish citizenship revocation decision?

    Yes. Citizenship annulment and withdrawal decisions are subject to judicial review. The appropriate court, legal grounds, filing deadline and possible interim remedies must be determined according to the particular administrative act.

    14. Does filing a lawsuit automatically restore or preserve my Turkish citizenship?

    No automatic result should be assumed. Filing an action does not necessarily suspend the administrative decision. Any suspension of execution or final judgment must be assessed in accordance with Turkish administrative procedure.

    15. Can a Turkish lawyer investigate my citizenship status without a power of attorney?

    Turkish lawyers have certain statutory rights to examine documents and files, but these rights are subject to legal restrictions. Access to confidential material, personal civil registry records, certified copies or the receipt of notifications may require appropriate authorisation or a power of attorney.

    16. I have not received any official notification. Should I simply wait?

    Where there is a concrete risk, waiting for notification may not be sufficient. It may be appropriate to establish the current status through lawful enquiries, preserve relevant evidence and monitor applicable legal deadlines.

    17. If the criminal investigation is closed, will the citizenship problem also disappear?

    Not necessarily. The criminal and administrative processes operate under different legal rules. The outcome of a criminal investigation may be relevant, but it does not automatically dispose of every administrative question concerning citizenship acquisition.

    18. What if my property is still registered in my name?

    Continued ownership may be relevant to the reality of the investment. However, registration of ownership alone does not establish that every citizenship requirement was originally satisfied or that no administrative decision exists.

    19. Can I challenge an inaccurate retrospective property valuation?

    The methodology, factual assumptions, property identification, historical comparable sales and other technical aspects of a valuation may be examined and challenged through legally appropriate evidential procedures.

    20. What is the most important first step?

    The first priority is usually to establish the individual’s actual legal position rather than rely on news reports or unverified information. This includes identifying any existing citizenship decision, relevant criminal proceedings and time-sensitive legal remedies.

    20. Conclusion: What Is the Correct Legal Approach to Turkish Citizenship Revocation in 2026?

    The Turkish citizenship investigations announced in 2025 and 2026 have raised substantial questions for foreign investors who acquired citizenship through real estate.

    Official statements confirm that significant numbers of citizenship acquisition decisions have been annulled or withdrawn. However, they do not justify the assumption that every investor associated with the latest criminal investigations has already lost Turkish citizenship.

    Nor is it correct to assume that every genuine investor must necessarily retain citizenship regardless of whether the statutory acquisition conditions were satisfied.

    The legality of an administrative decision depends on the applicable statutory ground, the individual facts and the available evidence.

    A purchaser who genuinely transferred money, acquired real property and did not participate in fraudulent arrangements may possess important evidence supporting a defence. Yet the historical value of the property, the applicable investment threshold, eligibility documentation and other statutory conditions must also be examined.

    The law requires careful distinction between personal criminal wrongdoing, alleged defects in an investment transaction, and administrative deficiencies affecting citizenship acquisition.

    An effective legal response begins by establishing the investor’s current citizenship status, identifying any relevant criminal and administrative proceedings, and developing a document-based strategy that addresses the actual legal issues in the individual’s case.

    At dolgun.av.tr, research concerning Turkish citizenship law, investment-based naturalisation, administrative annulment and withdrawal decisions, and related judicial developments is reviewed as new reliable information becomes available.

    However, the availability of publicly reported or verbally communicated information does not establish unrestricted access to every confidential investigation or the definitive status of every individual citizenship file.

    Legal Assessment of Turkish Citizenship and Investment Investigations

    Individuals concerned about the possible annulment or withdrawal of Turkish citizenship acquired through real estate investment may seek an individual legal assessment based on their citizenship acquisition documents, land registry records, bank statements, property valuation reports, investment eligibility certificate and any relevant judicial or administrative decisions.

    When requesting an initial assessment, it may be useful to provide the year of citizenship acquisition, the name and location of the development project, available title deed information, evidence of payment and information about whether the investor currently resides in Türkiye or abroad.

    Attorney Murat Can Dolğun
    Istanbul Bar Association – Registration No. 75860
    Website: dolgun.av.tr
    Contact: Visit the official website for contact and consultation enquiries

    Legal disclaimer: This article is intended for general legal information and academic discussion. It does not constitute an individual legal opinion or a guarantee of any administrative or judicial outcome. Every case must be examined in light of its specific facts and the applicable law.


    21. Legislation, Academic Literature, Council of State Decisions and News Sources

    A. Legislation and Official Regulations

    [L1] Turkish Citizenship Law No. 5901, Official Gazette, June 12, 2009, No. 27256; particularly Articles 12, 31, 32, 33, 36, 37, 40 and 41. Official legislation (Turkish).

    [L2] General Directorate of Land Registry and Cadastre (Tapu ve Kadastro Genel Müdürlüğü), administrative guidance and applicable regulations regarding the transition from the USD 250,000 property investment threshold to the USD 400,000 threshold in 2022. Official institution website.

    [L3] Administrative Procedure Law No. 2577 (İdari Yargılama Usulü Kanunu), particularly Articles 7, 8 and 27.

    [L4] Attorneyship Law No. 1136 (Avukatlık Kanunu), particularly Articles 2 and 46.

    B. Academic Publications

    [A1] Güner, Cemil. “Türk Vatandaşlığının Kazanılması ve Kaybı Kararlarının Geri Alınması” [Withdrawal of Decisions Concerning the Acquisition and Loss of Turkish Citizenship]. Milletlerarası Hukuk ve Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk Bülteni, Vol. 37, No. 2, 2017. DergiPark academic article.

    [A2] Özgür, Çiçek. “Yatırım Yoluyla Kazanılan Türk Vatandaşlığının İptali ve Geri Alınması” [Annulment and Withdrawal of Turkish Citizenship Acquired Through Investment]. Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Vol. 75, No. 1, 2026, pp. 741–779. DOI: 10.33629/auhfd.1710185. DergiPark academic article.

    [A3] Erden, Hümeyra Zeynep. “Türk Vatandaşlığına Alınma Kararının İptalinde Süre” [Time Limits in the Annulment of Decisions Granting Turkish Citizenship]. Milletlerarası Hukuk ve Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk Bülteni, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2016. DergiPark academic article.

    C. Decisions of the Council of State (Danıştay)

    [J1] Council of State (Danıştay), Tenth Chamber, February 5, 2026, E.2024/405, K.2026/361. Withdrawal of investment-based Turkish citizenship following irregularities in foreign currency purchase documents and cancellation of the investment eligibility certificate. Official judgment (Turkish).

    [J2] Council of State (Danıştay), Tenth Chamber, February 4, 2026, E.2024/3835, K.2026/324. Judicial review of a withdrawal decision based on national-security and public-order considerations; legal grounds and supporting evidence. Official judgment (Turkish).

    [J3] Council of State (Danıştay), Tenth Chamber, December 30, 2025, E.2025/6295, K.2025/7133. Notification and time limits in citizenship-related administrative litigation. Official judgment (Turkish).

    D. Official Statements and News Reports

    [N1] Candan, Fatma Nur. “Muvazaalı gayrimenkul satışıyla vatandaşlık sağlayan suç örgütü çökertildi.” Anadolu Ajansı, September 24, 2025. Original report (Turkish).

    [N2] Anadolu Ajansı. “Yabancılara usulsüz vatandaşlık kazandıran suç örgütüne yönelik operasyonda yakalanan 113 şüpheli adliyede.” September 2025. Original report (Turkish).

    [N3] Republic of Türkiye, Ministry of Justice. “Bakan Gürlek: 687 Kişinin Vatandaşlığının İptali İçin Yasal Süreç Başlatıldı.” Official statement, August 4, 2026. Official statement (Turkish).

    [N4] Yeşildal, Zeynep; Gökmen, Emrah; Yıldız, Dilhan Türker; Eser, Zehra Tekeci. “İstanbul merkezli usulsüz vatandaşlık operasyonunda 73 zanlı yakalandı.” Anadolu Ajansı, September 21, 2026. The report includes statements from the Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office, the Ministry of Justice and the Ministry of Interior. Original report (Turkish).

    [N5] Demir, İrem. “Haksız yollarla Türk vatandaşlığı kazandırdığı belirlenen suç örgütü operasyonunda 32 zanlı tutuklandı.” Anadolu Ajansı, August 7, 2026. Original report (Turkish).

    [N6] Yeşildal, Zeynep; Gökmen, Emrah. “İstanbul merkezli usulsüz vatandaşlık operasyonunda yakalanan 33 şüpheli tutuklandı.” Anadolu Ajansı, September 25, 2026. Original report (Turkish).

    [N7] TRT Haber / Anadolu Ajansı. “İçişleri Bakanlığı’ndan İstanbul’daki usulsüz vatandaşlık operasyonuna ilişkin açıklama.” September 21, 2026. Original report (Turkish).

    [N8] Gürel, Ayşe. “İstanbul merkezli 13 ilde sahte belgelerle vatandaşlık operasyonu: 73 gözaltı.” Demirören Haber Ajansı, September 21, 2026. Original report (Turkish).

    [N9] Habertürk Yerel Haberler / Anadolu Ajansı. “İçişleri Bakanlığından İstanbul’daki usulsüz vatandaşlık operasyonuna ilişkin açıklama.” September 21, 2026. Original report (Turkish).

    [N10] Haber Global / Anadolu Ajansı. “İçişleri Bakanlığı duyurdu: Binlerce yabancının vatandaşlığı iptal.” September 21, 2026. Original report (Turkish).

    Source methodology: Certain news outlets reproduced or summarised the same official statements originally reported by Anadolu Ajansı. Such publications are listed as reporting sources, not as separate independent confirmations of the underlying criminal allegations. Anonymous practice-based observations and unconfirmed verbal information are expressly distinguished from official records, judicial decisions and verified public announcements.


    September 19, 2026: Annulment and Withdrawal of Turkish Citizenship Acquired Through Investment: Fraudulent Valuation, Sham Transactions, Good-Faith Investors and Judicial Protection. An analysis of Articles 31 and 40, investment authenticity, legal certainty and judicial remedies. Original article in Turkish.

    September 26, 2026: The 1,070-Person Turkish Citizenship Investigation in 2026. Analysis of the September investigation, 263 principal investors, 807 family members and allegedly sham property transactions. Original article in Turkish.

    September 28, 2026: Turkish Citizenship Annulment and Withdrawal 2026: Frequently Asked Questions, Criminal Investigations and Judicial Remedies. Discussion of status verification, criminal proceedings and legal issues affecting investors living abroad. Original article in Turkish.

    September 28, 2026: Turkish Citizenship Annulment and Withdrawal 2026: New Property Valuations, Insufficient Investment, Families, Children and Construction Companies Under Investigation. Analysis of valuation disputes, family nationality issues and relevant construction projects. Original article in Turkish.

    All related publications: Dolgun Akademi – Citizenship Law.

    ↑ Back to Table of Contents

  • Türk Vatandaşlığı İptali ve Geri Alınması 2026: Yeni Ekspertiz, Eksik Yatırım, Aile, Çocuklar, Askerlik ve Soruşturulan İnşaat Şirketleri

    Türk Vatandaşlığı İptali ve Geri Alınması 2026: Yeni Ekspertiz, Eksik Yatırım, Aile, Çocuklar, Askerlik ve Soruşturulan İnşaat Şirketleri

    Türk Vatandaşlığı İptali ve Geri Alınması 2026: Yeni Ekspertiz, Eksik Yatırım, Aile, Çocuklar, Askerlik ve Soruşturulan İnşaat Şirketleri

    Son güncelleme: 28 Eylül 2026

    Gayrimenkul yatırımı yoluyla Türk vatandaşlığı kazanan yabancılar bakımından 2026 yılı, geçmiş vatandaşlık dosyalarının yeniden incelenmesi, yatırım uygunluk belgelerinin iptal edilmesi, eski ekspertiz raporlarının yeniden sorgulanması ve ceza soruşturmalarının vatandaşlık hukukuna etkisi bakımından son derece önemli gelişmelere sahne olmuştur.

    Özellikle Ağustos ve Eylül 2026 tarihli İstanbul Cumhuriyet Başsavcılığı soruşturmaları sonrasında şu sorular binlerce yatırımcı ve aile bakımından doğrudan önem kazanmıştır:

    İdare yıllar önce vatandaşlık alınırken kullanılan ekspertiz raporunu yeniden inceleyebilir mi? Yeni ekspertiz veya bilirkişi raporu isteyebilir mi? Eksik kalan yatırım bugün tamamlanabilir mi? Yatırımcı gerçekten parayı ödemiş fakat ekspertiz raporu hatalıysa ne olur? Askerliğini yapmış kişinin vatandaşlığı sona erdirilebilir mi? Eş ve çocukların vatandaşlığı ne olur? Vatandaşlıktan sonra doğan çocukların durumu farklı mıdır? Soruşturmalarda hangi şirketlerin adı geçmektedir? Hangi projelerin soruşturmaya dahil olduğu kesin olarak bilinmektedir?

    Bu çalışma; 5901 sayılı Türk Vatandaşlığı Kanunu, Türk Vatandaşlığı Kanununun Uygulanmasına İlişkin Yönetmelik, Tapu ve Kadastro Genel Müdürlüğü düzenlemeleri, güncel Danıştay kararları, Millî Savunma Bakanlığı düzenlemeleri, 2026 yılında yayımlanan akademik çalışmalar ve 28 Eylül 2026 tarihine kadar kamuoyuna açıklanan güncel soruşturmalar birlikte değerlendirilerek hazırlanmıştır.

    1. 2026 Yılındaki En Yeni Gelişme Nedir?

    21 Eylül 2026 tarihinde İstanbul merkezli 13 ilde gerçekleştirilen ikinci dalga operasyonla birlikte yatırım yoluyla Türk vatandaşlığının kazanılmasına ilişkin incelemelerin kapsamının önemli ölçüde genişlediği kamuoyuna açıklanmıştır.

    İstanbul Cumhuriyet Başsavcılığı tarafından yapılan ve Anadolu Ajansı, TRT Haber, Habertürk, DHA ve çok sayıda haber kuruluşu tarafından aktarılan açıklamalara göre; soruşturmada Tapu ve Kadastro kayıtları, bilirkişi raporları, MASAK analizleri ve diğer bilgi ve belgeler birlikte değerlendirilmiştir. Soruşturma makamları, bazı işlemlerde vatandaşlığın kazanılması için gerekli döviz girişinin gerçekte sağlanmadığını, aracı şirketler veya satıcılara ait mali kaynaklarla görünüşte para hareketleri meydana getirildiğini ve bazı gayrimenkuller hakkında gerçeğe aykırı yüksek bedelli ekspertiz raporları düzenlendiğini ileri sürmektedir. [H1] [H2] [H3] [H4] [H5]

    Bu iddiaların ceza soruşturması kapsamında bulunduğu ve soruşturulan kişi veya şirketler yönünden kesinleşmiş mahkumiyet anlamına gelmediği özellikle belirtilmelidir. Masumiyet karinesi geçerlidir.

    21 Eylül 2026 ikinci dalga Kamuoyuna açıklanan veri
    İncelenen yabancıya yapılan satış 734
    Muvazaalı olduğu ileri sürülen/tespit edildiği açıklanan satış 274
    Vatandaşlık kazandığı belirtilen toplam kişi 1.070
    Yatırımcı 263
    Aile ferdi 807
    Karar tarihinde vatandaşlık kazanan 1.015
    Karar tarihinden sonra vatandaşlık kazandığı açıklanan çocuk 55
    Soruşturmada belirtilen işlem büyüklüğü 72.250.000 USD / 3,5 milyar TL’yi aşan tutar
    Hakkında yakalama işlemi yürütülen şüpheli 88
    25 Eylül itibarıyla tutuklanan 33
    Konutu terk etmeme tedbiri 20
    Diğer adli kontrol 21
    El konulduğu açıklanan taşınmaz 2.011
    El konulan ve kayyum atandığı açıklanan anonim şirket 30

    Kaynaklar: İstanbul Cumhuriyet Başsavcılığı açıklamalarını aktaran Anadolu Ajansı, TRT Haber, Habertürk, DHA, Ekotürk ve diğer güncel haber kaynakları. [H1]-[H8]

    2. Bugüne Kadar Kaç Kişinin Vatandaşlığı İptal Edildi veya Geri Alındı?

    İçişleri Bakanlığının 21 Eylül 2026 tarihinde kamuoyuna yansıyan açıklamasında, yatırım yoluyla vatandaşlık dosyalarına ilişkin çok daha geniş bir toplam rakam paylaşılmıştır.

    İşlem Yatırımcı / kapsam Aile fertleri dahil toplam
    Vatandaşlık kararının iptali Çeşitli yatırım dosyaları 5.391 kişi
    Vatandaşlık kararının geri alınması 263 yatırımcı ve aileleri 743 kişi
    Genel toplam 1.413 yatırımcı 6.134 kişi
    11 Şubat 2026 sonrası uygunluk belgesi iptal edilen yatırımcılar 458 yatırımcı 1.393 kişi

    Bu rakamlar Anadolu Ajansı, TRT Haber ve Habertürk tarafından İçişleri Bakanlığı açıklamasına dayanılarak aktarılmıştır. [H1] [H3] [H6]

    Ancak burada çok önemli bir terminolojik uyarı yapılmalıdır: Kamuoyu açıklamalarında zaman zaman “iptal” sözcüğü bütün vatandaşlık sona erdirme işlemleri için genel anlamda kullanılmaktadır. Oysa 5901 sayılı Türk Vatandaşlığı Kanununda “iptal” ile “geri alma” iki farklı hukuki kurumdur.

    3. Vatandaşlığın İptali ile Vatandaşlık Kararının Geri Alınması Arasındaki Fark Nedir?

    Bu ayrım yalnızca akademik bir ayrım değildir. İşlemin geçmişe etkisi, eş ve çocukların statüsü, vatandaşlık döneminde gerçekleştirilen hukuki işlemler ve dava stratejisi bakımından doğrudan sonuç doğurur.

    Konu İptal Geri alma
    Kanuni dayanak 5901 sayılı TVK m.31-32 5901 sayılı TVK m.40
    Temel sebep İlgilinin yalan beyanı veya vatandaşlığı kazanmaya esas önemli hususları gizlemesi Hukuki şartlar oluşmadan, mükerrer veya Yönetmelik uyarınca sehven karar verilmiş olması
    Zaman bakımından etki Karar tarihinden itibaren ileriye etkili İlk karar tarihinden itibaren hükümsüzlük; geçmişe etkili sonuç
    Eş ve çocuklar Yatırımcıya bağlı olarak vatandaşlık kazanan eş ve çocukları da etkiler; Yönetmelik m.58/2 istisnaları ayrıca uygulanır Ana kararın geriye etkili hükümsüzlüğü nedeniyle bağlı aile kararlarının hukuki dayanağı ayrıca incelenmelidir
    Vatandaşlık dönemindeki işlemler Yönetmelik m.58/1 gereğince iptalden etkilenmez Geri alma ex tunc sonuç doğurduğundan daha karmaşık hukuki sonuçlar ortaya çıkarabilir

    5901 sayılı Kanun m.31, vatandaşlığın kazanılması kararının ilgilinin yalan beyanı veya vatandaşlığı kazanmaya esas teşkil eden önemli hususları gizlemesi sonucunda meydana gelmiş olması halinde kararı veren makam tarafından iptal edileceğini düzenlemektedir. [M1]

    TVK m.32 ise iptal kararının karar tarihinden itibaren hüküm ifade edeceğini ve ilgili kişiye bağlı olarak Türk vatandaşlığını kazanan eş ve çocuklara da uygulanacağını düzenlemektedir. [M1]

    Buna karşılık TVK m.40, vatandaşlığın kazanılmasına veya kaybına ilişkin kararların hukuki şartlar oluşmadan veya mükerrer olarak verildiğinin sonradan anlaşılması halinde geri alınmasını düzenlemektedir. Uygulama Yönetmeliği m.66 buna “sehven verilme” halini de eklemekte ve geri alınan kararın ilk karar tarihinden itibaren hükümsüz hale geleceğini açıkça düzenlemektedir. [M2] [M3]

    Dolayısıyla iptal ile geri alma birbirinin yerine kullanılabilecek kavramlar değildir.

    4. Yatırımcının Hilesi Yoksa Vatandaşlık Yine de Geri Alınabilir mi?

    Bu soru özellikle ekspertiz şirketinin veya satıcının hatalı ya da gerçeğe aykırı işlem yaptığı, buna karşılık yabancı yatırımcının gerçekten para ödediğini ileri sürdüğü dosyalarda belirleyicidir.

    TVK m.31 kapsamında iptal bakımından kanun lafzı, vatandaşlığın “ilgilinin yalan beyanı” veya ilgilinin vatandaşlığı kazanmaya esas önemli hususları gizlemesi sonucunda kazanılmış olmasını aramaktadır. Bu nedenle yalnızca üçüncü bir kişinin hatasının bulunması ile yatırımcının kendi yalan beyanı veya gizlemesi aynı hukuki olgu değildir.

    TVK m.40 kapsamındaki geri alma ise farklıdır. Burada temel soru, vatandaşlık kararı verildiği tarihte kanunun aradığı hukuki şartların gerçekten mevcut olup olmadığıdır. Dolayısıyla yatırımcının şahsi hilesinin bulunmadığı bir dosyada dahi, yatırım şartının objektif olarak hiçbir zaman gerçekleşmediği ileri sürülüyorsa idare m.40 yönünden değerlendirme yapabilir.

    Ancak bu yetki sınırsız değildir.

    Danıştay 10. Dairenin 26.06.2025 tarihli, E.2022/7637, K.2025/3313 sayılı kararında son derece önemli bir ilke ortaya konulmuştur: “Hukuki şartların oluşmadığından” söz edilebilmesi için engel oluşturan maddi veya hukuki olgunun, vatandaşlığa alınma işleminin tesis edildiği tarihte veya daha önce mevcut olması gerekir. Vatandaşlığın kazanılmasından sonra gerçekleşen ve önceki dönemle bağlantısı bulunmayan yeni olgular, geçmişte vatandaşlık şartlarının oluşmadığını tek başına göstermez. [Y1]

    Bu karar doğrudan ekspertiz bedelinin yeniden belirlenmesine ilişkin bir dava değildir. Bununla birlikte “şartların vatandaşlığa alınma tarihi itibarıyla değerlendirilmesi” ilkesi, geçmiş yatırım dosyalarının bugün yeniden incelenmesinde son derece önemlidir.

    5. İdare Yıllar Sonra Yeniden Ekspertiz İsteyebilir mi?

    Kısa cevap: Evet, dosyanın yeniden araştırılması kapsamında yeni bir değerleme veya bilirkişi incelemesine başvurulması hukuken mümkündür. Ancak yeni raporun neyi ispatladığı ayrıca tartışılmalıdır.

    5901 sayılı Kanun m.38, vatandaşlık işlemlerine ilişkin inceleme ve araştırmalarda kamu kurum ve kuruluşlarının gerekli bilgi ve belgeleri vermesini düzenlemektedir. Uygulama Yönetmeliği m.57/2 de vatandaşlığın kazanılmasına ilişkin yalan beyan veya gizleme iddiasının herhangi bir şekilde öğrenilmesi halinde Bakanlık tarafından araştırma ve soruşturma yapılabileceğini veya yaptırılabileceğini düzenlemektedir. [M2] [M4]

    Nitekim 2026 yılındaki güncel soruşturmalarda eski dosyaların yalnızca ilk ekspertiz raporları üzerinden incelenmediği; Tapu ve Kadastro kayıtları, yeni bilirkişi raporları, MASAK verileri, banka hareketleri ve diğer delillerin birlikte değerlendirildiği Başsavcılık açıklamalarında açıkça görülmektedir. [H1] [H2] [H8]

    Ancak burada iki ayrı soru birbirine karıştırılmamalıdır:

    Birinci soru: İdare veya soruşturma makamı yeni bir bilirkişi/değerleme çalışması yaptırabilir mi?
    Cevap: Evet.

    İkinci soru: 2026 yılında taşınmazın bugünkü değerinin düşük çıkması, 2019, 2020 veya 2021 yılında vatandaşlık için gerekli değerin bulunmadığını tek başına kanıtlar mı?
    Cevap: Hayır.

    Hukuken araştırılması gereken husus, taşınmazın vatandaşlığa esas alınan tarihteki gerçek değeri ve o tarihte yürürlükte bulunan yatırım şartlarının gerçekleşip gerçekleşmediğidir.

    Danıştay 10. Dairenin yukarıda belirtilen 2025 tarihli kararı da hukuki şartların kural olarak vatandaşlığa alınma tarihindeki maddi ve hukuki durum üzerinden değerlendirilmesi gerektiğini ortaya koymaktadır. [Y1]

    Dolayısıyla 2026 yılında hazırlanan bir bilirkişi raporunun hukuken anlamlı olabilmesi için, uyuşmazlığın niteliğine göre 2026 piyasa fiyatını değil, geçmiş işlem tarihindeki değeri geriye dönük olarak incelemesi gerekebilir.

    6. Eski Ekspertiz Raporu ile Yeni Bilirkişi Raporu Farklıysa Hangisi Geçerlidir?

    Bu konuda “yeni rapor eski raporu kendiliğinden hükümsüz kılar” şeklinde genel bir kural yoktur.

    Bir vatandaşlık dosyasındaki gerçek yatırımın değerlendirilmesinde yalnızca tek ekspertiz raporuna bakılması yerine aşağıdaki deliller birlikte incelenmelidir:

    Eski SPK lisanslı değerleme raporu; tapudaki resmi satış bedeli; satıcı ve alıcı arasındaki satış sözleşmesi; banka dekontları; SWIFT belgeleri; döviz alım belgesi; satıcının hesabına fiilen giren para; paranın daha sonra yatırımcıya dönüp dönmediği; yatırımcı hesabına satıştan hemen önce üçüncü kişiler tarafından para aktarılıp aktarılmadığı; taşınmazın işlem tarihindeki emsal satışları; aynı projede aynı dönemde gerçekleşen bağımsız satışlar; vergi ve tapu kayıtları; uygunluk belgesi; yatırımcının işlemdeki iyi niyeti ve bilgisi.

    Danıştay 10. Dairenin 12.12.2024 tarihli, E.2020/5861, K.2024/6304 sayılı kararında da vatandaşlık amacıyla kullanılan gayrimenkul işlemlerinde değerleme raporu, tapuda gösterilen satış bedeli ve bu bedelin sonradan değiştirilmek istenmesi tartışılmıştır. Karar doğrudan 2026 iptal soruşturmalarını konu almamakla birlikte, vatandaşlık gayrimenkul işlemlerinde değerleme raporu ile resmi senetteki bedelin birbirinden bağımsız değerlendirme unsurları olduğunu göstermesi bakımından önem taşımaktadır. [Y2]

    7. Yatırımcı Gerçekte Gerekli Parayı Ödediyse Fakat Ekspertiz Raporunda Sorun Varsa Ne Olur?

    Bu durum, bedelin gerçekte hiç ödenmediği bir dosyayla aynı değildir.

    Örneğin ilgili dönemde 250.000 USD şartı yürürlükteyken yatırımcı gerçekte 300.000 USD ödemiş, bu para kendi kaynağından banka yoluyla satıcıya ulaşmış, taşınmaz işlem tarihinde gerçekten 300.000 USD değerinde olmuş fakat değerleme şirketinin raporunda usule ilişkin bir problem ortaya çıkmışsa; yatırım şartının maddi olarak bulunup bulunmadığı ayrıca araştırılmalıdır.

    Buna karşılık taşınmaz gerçekte 100.000 USD değerinde olduğu halde yalnızca kağıt üzerinde 250.000 USD veya 400.000 USD değerinde gösterilmişse; ya da yatırımcı tarafından ödendiği gösterilen para gerçekte satıcı veya aracı tarafından yatırımcıya önceden verilmiş ve daha sonra geri dönmüşse; dosyanın hukuki niteliği tamamen değişebilir.

    2026 soruşturmalarında da savcılık makamlarının özellikle gerçeğe aykırı yüksek ekspertiz, görünüşte banka hareketleri ve gerçekte gerçekleşmediği ileri sürülen döviz girişleri üzerinde durduğu görülmektedir. [H1] [H2] [H4] [H8]

    8. Hangi Tarihte Ne Kadar Gayrimenkul Yatırımı Gerekiyordu?

    Dosya incelenirken bugünkü 400.000 USD sınırını geçmiş bütün dosyalara uygulamak hukuken doğru değildir. Her dosya kendi işlem tarihindeki mevzuata göre incelenmelidir.

    Dönem Gayrimenkul yatırım eşiği
    12.01.2017 – 18.09.2018 1.000.000 USD
    19.09.2018 sonrası ilgili eski dönem 250.000 USD
    13.06.2022 ve sonrası 400.000 USD

    TKGM’nin 01.06.2022 tarihli geçiş talimatına göre, 250.000 USD uygulamasından 400.000 USD uygulamasına geçişte 12.06.2022 saat 24.00’a kadar yapılan belirli başvurular için eski sınır korunmuş; 13.06.2022 sonrasında ise kural olarak 400.000 USD sistemi uygulanmaya başlanmıştır. [T1] [T2]

    9. İdare Eksik Kalan Hususu Sonradan Tamamlattırabilir mi?

    Evet, fakat burada “eksik belge” ile “eksik yatırım” kesinlikle birbirinden ayrılmalıdır.

    5901 sayılı Kanunun 39. maddesinin başlığı “Maddi hataların düzeltilmesi ve tamamlama”dır. Maddeye göre, Kanun kapsamında alınan kararlarda maddi hata veya eksiklik bulunduğunun sonradan anlaşılması halinde, “dayanağına uygun şekilde” Genel Müdürlük tarafından düzeltme veya tamamlama kararı alınabilir. [M5]

    Uygulama Yönetmeliği m.65 de düzeltme veya tamamlama mekanizmasını özellikle kararlarda yer alan kişi bilgilerinin dayanağına uygun şekilde düzeltilmesi ve eksik bilgilerin tamamlanması bağlamında düzenlemektedir. [M6]

    Bu hükümler, “2019 yılında yapılması gereken 250.000 USD yatırım gerçekte 150.000 USD idi; 2026 yılında 100.000 USD daha yatırıp eski vatandaşlığı geçmişe dönük olarak hukuka uygun hale getirelim” şeklinde genel bir tamamlama yetkisi olarak yorumlanamaz.

    Eksiklik türü Sonradan giderilme ihtimali Hukuki değerlendirme
    Mevcut ödemenin dekontunun dosyada bulunmaması Mümkün olabilir Yeni belgeyle geçmişte gerçekten gerçekleşmiş ödeme ispatlanmaktadır.
    Vekalet, kimlik veya şekli belge eksikliği Somut düzenlemeye göre tamamlanabilir Maddi yatırım şartından farklıdır.
    Gerçekte 250.000/400.000 USD ödendiği halde ödeme zincirinin yeterince belgelenmemesi İspat meselesidir Banka ve satıcı kayıtlarıyla geçmiş maddi olgu ispatlanabilir.
    Taşınmazın işlem tarihinde gerekli değeri gerçekte taşımaması Sonradan belge sunmakla geçmişe dönük oluşmaz TVK m.40 bakımından karar tarihindeki hukuki şartların bulunup bulunmadığı gündeme gelir.
    Gerçekte gerekli tutarın hiç ödenmemiş olması Sonradan ödeme yapılması ayrı bir olgudur Sonradan yapılan ödeme, geçmiş işlem tarihinde var olmayan ödemeyi geriye dönük olarak yaratmaz.

    10. TKGM Daha Önce Eksikliklerin Tamamlanmasına İzin Verdi mi?

    Evet. TKGM’nin 01.06.2022 tarihli geçiş talimatı bu ayrımı somut biçimde göstermektedir.

    Talimat uyarınca, 250.000 USD şartının sağlandığı ve vatandaşlık taahhüdünün alındığı bazı devam eden işlemlerde, diğer eksikliklerin 13.06.2022 tarihinden sonra tamamlanması halinde dosyanın eski 250.000 USD sınırı üzerinden sonuçlandırılabileceği belirtilmiştir. [T2]

    Aynı talimatta değeri belirleyen belgeler olan döviz alım belgesi, değerleme raporu ve dekont yönünden de ayrı kurallar getirilmiştir. Dolayısıyla TKGM uygulaması dahi yatırım tutarının maddi olarak var olması ile buna ilişkin belgesel/şekli eksikliğin aynı şey olmadığını göstermektedir.

    Güncel TKGM kılavuzunda da vatandaşlık için kullanılan taşınmazların gerekli yatırım tutarını karşılamaması halinde kalan miktarın satış vaadi sözleşmesiyle tamamlanamayacağı belirtilmektedir. TKGM’nin Your Key Türkiye sayfası da yatırım için eksik kalan kısmın 01.02.2023 tarihinden sonra satış vaadi sözleşmesi ile tamamlanmasının mümkün olmadığını açıkça belirtmektedir. [T3] [T4]

    11. Eksik Yatırım Bugün Tamamlanırsa Eski Vatandaşlık Kurtarılabilir mi?

    Genel ve güvenli cevap: Geçmişte hiç gerçekleşmemiş maddi yatırım şartının bugün para eklenmesiyle geçmişe dönük olarak var olmuş kabul edilmesi gerektiğine ilişkin genel bir hukuki kural yoktur.

    Burada belirleyici tarih, yatırımın ve vatandaşlık kararının hukuken gerçekleşmesi gereken tarihtir.

    Danıştay 10. Dairenin E.2022/7637, K.2025/3313 sayılı kararında da TVK m.40 bakımından şartların vatandaşlığa alınma tarihi itibarıyla değerlendirilmesi gerektiği belirtilmektedir. [Y1]

    Bu nedenle iki senaryo ayrılmalıdır:

    Senaryo A: Para o tarihte gerçekten ödenmiştir, yatırım şartı maddi olarak gerçekleşmiştir fakat dosyada bunu gösteren belgeler eksik veya hatalıdır. Burada yeni belgeler eski tarihte gerçekleşmiş bir olgunun ispatına hizmet edebilir.

    Senaryo B: Para o tarihte gerçekte hiç ödenmemiştir veya taşınmaz gerekli gerçek değeri taşımamaktadır. Yıllar sonra yapılan yeni ödeme, geçmişte bulunmayan maddi olguyu kendiliğinden geçmişe taşımaz.

    12. Günümüzde TTB Nedir ve Neden Önemlidir?

    Güncel TKGM sisteminde vatandaşlık amacıyla taşınmaz ediniminde Taşınmaz Edinim Sureti ile Vatandaşlık Kazanımına Esas Tutar Tespit Belgesi (TTB) kullanılmaktadır.

    2024/4 sayılı Genelge ve eki kılavuza göre vatandaşlığa esas yatırım tutarının belirlenmesinde resmi senette beyan edilen satış bedeli veya satış vaadi bedeli ile bedel transferleri/ödemeleri ayrı ayrı ilgili dönemde aranan yatırım tutarını sağlamalı ve bu değerler TTB ile teyit edilmelidir. [T3] [T5]

    Bu sistem geçmiş yıllardaki her vatandaşlık dosyasının bugün 2024/4 Genelge hükümlerine göre yeniden kurulacağı anlamına gelmez. Geçmiş dosyanın esas hukuki şartı, işlem tarihinde yürürlükte bulunan mevzuat üzerinden değerlendirilmelidir.

    13. Askerliğini Yapan Bir Kişinin Vatandaşlığı İptal Edilebilir mi?

    Evet. Askerlik hizmetini yapmış olmak, tek başına vatandaşlığın iptalini veya vatandaşlık kararının geri alınmasını engelleyen bir kanuni bağışıklık oluşturmaz.

    Fakat askerlik hizmetinin hukuki sonucu açısından iptal ile geri alma yine ayrılmalıdır.

    Uygulama Yönetmeliği m.58/1’e göre, vatandaşlık kazanma tarihinden vatandaşlığın iptal edildiği tarihe kadar kişinin Türk vatandaşı sıfatıyla gerçekleştirdiği işlemler iptal kararından etkilenmez. [M4]

    Bu hüküm nedeniyle, TVK m.31 anlamında ileriye etkili iptal halinde kişinin geçmişte Türk vatandaşı olarak tamamladığı askerlik hizmetinin sırf vatandaşlığı sonradan iptal edildi diye tarihsel olarak hiç yapılmamış sayılması gerektiğine ilişkin bir düzenleme bulunmamaktadır.

    Millî Savunma Bakanlığının güncel açıklamasında da Türk vatandaşlığını kaybettikten sonra yeniden vatandaşlığa alınan kişinin askerlik kaydının yeniden canlandırılacağı ve askerlik işlemlerinin vatandaşlığı kaybettiği tarihteki durum ve statüsüne göre kaldığı yerden devam edeceği; önceki askerlik safahatının dikkate alınacağı belirtilmektedir. [A1] [A2]

    TVK m.40 kapsamındaki geri alma ise ilk vatandaşlık kararını geçmişe etkili biçimde hükümsüz hale getirdiğinden teorik ve idari sonuçları daha karmaşıktır. Bu nedenle askerlik yapmış veya bedelli/dövizle askerlik işlemi gerçekleştirmiş kişilerde vatandaşlığın hangi hukuki yolla sona erdirildiği ayrıca incelenmelidir.

    14. Vatandaşlığı İptal Edilen Yatırımcının Eşine Ne Olur?

    TVK m.32 açık biçimde, iptal kararının ilgili kişiye bağlı olarak Türk vatandaşlığını kazanan eş ve çocuklar hakkında da uygulanacağını düzenlemektedir. [M1]

    Buradaki anahtar kavram “ilgili kişiye bağlı olarak vatandaşlığı kazanmak”tır.

    Yatırımcı ile aynı dosyada, yatırımcıya bağlı olarak vatandaşlık kazanan eş m.32 kapsamındadır.

    Buna karşılık Uygulama Yönetmeliği m.58/2’de özel bir istisna bulunmaktadır: Evlenme yoluyla sonradan Türk vatandaşlığını kazanan eş, yatırımcının vatandaşlığının iptalinden etkilenmez. [M4]

    Dolayısıyla her eş bakımından “yatırımcıyla birlikte vatandaşlığı gider” şeklinde sonuç çıkarmak hukuken hatalıdır. Vatandaşlığın hangi hukuki sebebe dayanarak ve hangi tarihte kazanıldığı nüfus kayıtlarından ve vatandaşlık kararından tespit edilmelidir.

    15. Çocukların Vatandaşlığı Ne Olur?

    Çocuklar bakımından dosya daha da dikkatli incelenmelidir.

    TVK m.32 uyarınca yatırımcıya bağlı olarak vatandaşlık kazanan çocuklar kural olarak iptal kararından etkilenir.

    Ancak Uygulama Yönetmeliği m.58/2 çok önemli bir istisna getirmektedir:

    Vatandaşlığı sonradan iptal edilen kişinin Türk vatandaşlığını kazandıktan sonra doğan çocuğuna iptal kararı tesir etmez. [M4]

    16. 2026 Soruşturmasındaki “55 Çocuk” Neden Özel Olarak Önemli?

    İçişleri Bakanlığının 21 Eylül 2026 açıklamasında, soruşturma kapsamındaki 1.070 kişinin 1.015’inin karar tarihinde, 55 çocuğun ise karar tarihinden sonra Türk vatandaşlığını kazandığı belirtilmiştir. [H1] [H3] [H6]

    Fakat burada son derece önemli bir hukuki ayrım vardır:

    “Karar tarihinden sonra vatandaşlık kazanmış olmak” ile “ebeveyn Türk vatandaşlığını kazandıktan sonra doğmuş olmak” aynı şey değildir.

    Yönetmelik m.58/2’nin açık koruması, vatandaşlık kazanıldıktan sonra doğan çocuğa ilişkindir.

    Bu nedenle kamuoyuna açıklanan 55 çocuğun tamamının m.58/2 kapsamına girdiği veya tamamının vatandaşlığının sona ereceği bugün için söylenemez.

    Her çocuk yönünden en az şu tarihler ayrı ayrı tespit edilmelidir: doğum tarihi, ana yatırımcının vatandaşlık tarihi, çocuğun vatandaşlık kazanma tarihi, çocuğun vatandaşlığı hangi hukuki nedenle kazandığı ve ebeveyn hakkındaki işlemin TVK m.31 anlamında iptal mi yoksa TVK m.40 anlamında geri alma mı olduğu.

    17. Çocuk Vatansız Kalacaksa Sonuç Değişir mi?

    Vatansızlığın önlenmesi, vatandaşlık hukukunun önemli ilkelerinden biridir. Bununla birlikte TVK m.31’de yalan beyan veya önemli hususların gizlenmesine bağlı iptal bakımından kanun açık bir iptal mekanizması öngörmektedir.

    Doktrinde vatandaşlığın iptali, geri alma, hukuki güvenlik, ölçülülük ve vatansızlığın önlenmesi bakımından önemli tartışmalar bulunmaktadır. Özellikle Çiçek Özgür’ün 11 Haziran 2026 tarihinde Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisinde yayımlanan “Yatırım Yoluyla Kazanılan Türk Vatandaşlığının İptali ve Geri Alınması” başlıklı çalışması, yatırım vatandaşlığı özelinde TVK m.31 ile m.40 arasındaki ayrımı ayrıntılı biçimde ele almaktadır. [D1]

    Aygün ve Uslu Yiğit’in Mart 2026 tarihli çalışması da yatırım yoluyla vatandaşlık rejimindeki hukuki belirsizlikleri ve uygulamadaki sorunları ayrıntılı olarak değerlendirmektedir. [D2]

    18. Bir İnşaat Şirketi Hakkında Soruşturma Varsa O Şirketten Ev Alan Herkesin Vatandaşlığı İptal Edilir mi?

    Hayır.

    Bir şirketin, yöneticisinin, değerleme uzmanının veya satış aracısının ceza soruşturmasında yer alması ile o şirketten taşınmaz alan bütün yatırımcıların bireysel vatandaşlık dosyalarının hukuka aykırı olması aynı şey değildir.

    İdarenin her yatırımcı bakımından şu sorulara cevap vermesi gerekir:

    Yatırımcının satın aldığı somut taşınmaz soruşturmaya konu satışlardan biri midir? Taşınmaz işlem tarihinde gerekli gerçek değeri taşıyor muydu? Yatırımcı gerekli tutarı gerçekten kendi malvarlığından ödedi mi? Para satıcıya gerçekten ulaştı mı? Para yatırımcıya geri döndü mü? Ekspertiz raporu gerçeğe uygun muydu? Yatırımcının rapordaki olası usulsüzlükten bilgisi veya katılımı var mıydı? Uygunluk belgesinin iptal edilmesinin somut gerekçesi nedir?

    Şirket bazında toplu şüphe ile kişi bazında vatandaşlık şartlarının gerçekleşip gerçekleşmediği birbirinden ayrılmalıdır.

    19. 2026 Birinci Dalga: Babacan İnşaat Bağlantılı Soruşturma

    4 Ağustos 2026 tarihinde Adalet Bakanlığı tarafından yapılan açıklamada düşük bedelli gayrimenkullerin sahte ekspertiz raporlarıyla yüksek gösterilmesi ve muvazaalı satış işlemleri üzerinden vatandaşlık kazandırıldığı iddiasıyla soruşturma yürütüldüğü; 687 kişinin vatandaşlığının iptali için yasal süreç başlatıldığı açıklanmıştır. [H9]

    7 Ağustos 2026 tarihinde Anadolu Ajansının haberine göre gözaltına alınan 80 şüpheliden 32’si tutuklanmış, 48 kişi hakkında adli kontrol uygulanmıştır. İlk açıklamada ayrıca yaklaşık 2,5 milyar TL tutarında dövizin ülkeye girmediği iddiası, 1.045 taşınmaza ve çeşitli diğer malvarlığı değerlerine el koyma tedbirleri kamuoyuna yansımıştır. [H10] [H11] [H12]

    21 Eylül 2026 tarihli ikinci dalga açıklamasında ilk dalga açıkça “Babacan İnşaat bağlantılı işlemler” şeklinde tanımlanmıştır. [H2] [H7]

    20. Babacan Bağlantılı Hangi Şirketlere Kayyum Atandığı Açıklandı?

    İlk operasyon haberlerinde 7 şirkete el konulduğu bildirilmiştir. Daha sonra Babacan GYO’nun kendi kurumsal internet sitesinde yayımlanan açıklamada, İstanbul Cumhuriyet Başsavcılığının 2026/132798 sayılı soruşturması ve İstanbul 11. Sulh Ceza Hakimliğinin kararı kapsamında aşağıdaki 12 şirket yönünden TMSF’nin kayyum olarak atandığı açıklanmıştır. [K1]

    No Babacan GYO’nun kurumsal açıklamasında belirtilen şirket
    1 B Grup Yapı Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ
    2 Babacan Grup Yatırım İnşaat Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ
    3 Babacan Gayrimenkul Enerji ve Turizm Sanayi Ticaret AŞ
    4 Babacan Girişim Lojistik Hizmetleri Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ
    5 BBC Enerji Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ
    6 Investment Global Zenith Gayrimenkul Sanayi Ticaret AŞ
    7 Batures Yönetim Turizm İşletme Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ
    8 Metares Bilişim ve Dijital Ticaret AŞ*
    9 EFCE Lojistik Hizmetleri Ticaret AŞ
    10 BBCN Yapı Gayrimenkul Geliştirme AŞ
    11 Babacan Gayrimenkul Yatırım Ortaklığı AŞ
    12 BCN Global Gayrimenkul Ticaret AŞ

    *Şirketin kurumsal açıklamasında şirket unvanı yazımında bir imla farklılığı görülmektedir. Ticaret sicili kaydı esas alınmadan kesin unvan değerlendirmesi yapılmamalıdır.

    Kurumsal açıklamada kayyum atamasının CMK m.133, 7539 sayılı Kanunla yapılan değişiklik ve 7145 sayılı Kanunun geçici hükümleri kapsamında gerçekleştirildiği; TMSF Fon Kurulunun 05.08.2026 tarihli 2026/508 ve 10.08.2026 tarihli 2026/523 sayılı kararlarıyla yeni yönetim kurullarının oluşturulduğu belirtilmektedir. [K1]

    21. 2026 İkinci Dalga: Resmen Adı Açıklanan Şirketler Hangileri?

    21 Eylül 2026 tarihli resmi açıklamaları aktaran haberlerde ikinci dalgada aşağıdaki üç yapı açıkça isimlendirilmiştir:

    Şirket / yapı Kamuya açık durum Kaynak
    Gül İnşaat AŞ İkinci dalgada satışlarının incelendiği açıkça belirtilmiştir. Adalet Bakanı açıklaması; TRT Haber, Habertürk, AA ve diğer haber kaynakları
    Beyaz İnşaat İkinci dalgada satışlarının incelendiği açıkça belirtilmiştir. Adalet Bakanı açıklaması; TRT Haber, Habertürk, AA ve diğer haber kaynakları
    LİV İnşaat / LİV Yapı İkinci dalgada satışlarının incelendiği açıkça belirtilmiştir. Adalet Bakanı açıklaması; TRT Haber, Habertürk, AA ve diğer haber kaynakları

    Bu şirketlerin soruşturmada adının geçmesi, şirketler veya bunların yöneticileri hakkında kesinleşmiş bir mahkumiyet bulunduğu anlamına gelmediği gibi, şirketlerin gerçekleştirdiği bütün projelerin veya bütün satışların soruşturmaya konu olduğu anlamına da gelmemektedir. [H1] [H2] [H7]

    22. Basında Yayımlanan Şüpheli Listelerinde Geçen Diğer Şirket Unvanları

    Takvim tarafından 21 Eylül 2026 tarihinde yayımlanan ve haber kuruluşunun “ulaştığını” belirttiği şüpheli listesinde, soruşturmayla bağlantılı olarak aşağıdaki şirket unvanları da yer almıştır. Bu bölüm resmi ve eksiksiz savcılık şirket listesi olarak değerlendirilmemelidir; yalnızca kamuoyuna yansıyan haber verisini göstermektedir. [H13]

    Basına yansıyan şirket/unvan Kaynak niteliği
    Gül İnşaat Proje AŞ Basında yayımlanan şüpheli listesi
    Gül İnşaat AŞ Resmi açıklamalarda da adı geçen yapı
    Gül Yapı İnşaat Turizm Petrol Ürünleri ve Dış Ticaret AŞ Basında yayımlanan şüpheli listesi
    Gül İnşaat Turizm ve Ticaret AŞ Basında yayımlanan şüpheli listesi
    LİV Yapı Gayrimenkul Yatırım Basında yayımlanan şüpheli listesi
    Beyaz İnşaat Petrol Ürünleri Turizm Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ Basında yayımlanan şüpheli listesi
    2K Yapı İnşaat Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ Basında yayımlanan şüpheli listesi

    Özellikle “Beyaz İnşaat” isminde piyasada farklı tüzel kişilik ve ticari yapılar bulunabildiğinden yalnızca ticari isim benzerliğinden hareketle başka bir şirket veya projeyi soruşturmayla ilişkilendirmek doğru değildir. Patronlar Dünyası tarafından yapılan araştırmada da soruşturma haberindeki unvanın Beyaz İnşaat Petrol Ürünleri Turizm Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ olduğu özellikle belirtilmiştir. [H14]

    23. Soruşturulan Projelerin Tam Listesi Var mı?

    28 Eylül 2026 itibarıyla savcılık veya ilgili Bakanlık tarafından yayımlanmış, 274 muvazaalı olduğu belirtilen satışın hangi projelerdeki hangi bağımsız bölümlere ait olduğunu tek tek gösteren kamuya açık ve doğrulanmış tam bir proje listesi bulunmamaktadır.

    Bu husus son derece önemlidir.

    İnternette, sosyal medya gruplarında ve WhatsApp gruplarında Gül, LİV, Beyaz ve Babacan bağlantılı çok sayıda proje adı paylaşılmaktadır. Ancak bir projenin söz konusu şirketlerden birinin portföyünde bulunması, o projenin vatandaşlık soruşturmasındaki 274 satıştan birini içerdiği anlamına gelmez.

    Patronlar Dünyası’nın 21-22 Eylül 2026 tarihli araştırmasında da 274 satışın Gül, LİV ve Beyaz arasında nasıl dağıldığının ve hangi projelerde gerçekleştirildiğinin henüz kamuoyuna açıklanmadığı özellikle belirtilmiştir. [H14]

    24. Piyasada Adı Dolaşan Projeler: Doğru Liste Nasıl Okunmalı?

    Aşağıdaki tablo “soruşturulan projeler listesi” değildir. Bu projeler, soruşturmada adı geçen şirketlerin kendi kurumsal sitelerinde veya güvenilir kurumsal kaynaklarda yer alan proje portföylerinden derlenmiştir. Amaç, piyasada dolaşan proje isimlerinin hangi şirket portföyüne dayandığını göstermek ve doğrulanmamış bir projeye suç isnadı yapılmasını önlemektir.

    Şirket / grup Kamuya açık portföyde görülen proje örnekleri Soruşturma bakımından durum
    Gül İnşaat Otoport, Metroport, Avangart, Eyüppark, Avcılar Park, Gül Express, Gülpark Yaşam, Güneşli Park Gardenya, Rose Marine Butik, Gül Parkyuvam, Güneşli Park, İş Batı, Rose Marine, Skyport, Kavaklı Konakları, Loca, Yedimavi, Gülpark 59, Terrace Garden, Eyüp Palas, Tempoint Şirket portföyüdür. Bu projelerin tamamının veya herhangi birinin 274 satış içinde bulunduğu kamuya açık resmi bir listeyle henüz doğrulanmamıştır.
    LİV Yapı Yedi Mavi, Avangart İstanbul, LİV Büyükçekmece, LİV Marmara, LİV Marine Villa, Otoport, Kalekent; ayrıca kurumsal sitede LİV Bahçeşehir ve Rose Marine isimleri görülmektedir. Portföy bilgisidir; soruşturma projesi olduğu anlamına gelmez.
    Beyaz İnşaat Beyaz Residence, Beyaz Kent, Beyaz City, White Corner, BeyCity, White Court, Beyaz Konaklar, Bakırköy Konakları, Beyaz Center Residence, Beyaz Tower, White Home, Şehr-i Bahar 2, Beyaz Vadi Residence, Beyaz Vadi Konakları Şirketin kamuya açık proje portföyüdür; projelerin soruşturmaya dahil olduğu sonucu çıkarılamaz.
    Babacan bağlantılı portföy Babacan Central, Babacan Lagoon, Babacan Port Royal, Vista Life; kurumsal sitede ayrıca Babacan Atakent Halkalı, Babacan GOP Residence/AVM/Ofis, Babacan Botanist Başakşehir ve diğer projeler yer almaktadır. İlk dalga “Babacan İnşaat bağlantılı işlemler” olarak açıklanmıştır; ancak kamuya açık resmi açıklama 687 işlemin hangi projelere dağıldığını tek tek göstermemektedir.

    Portföy kaynakları: Gül İnşaat resmi proje sayfası [K2], LİV Yapı resmi proje sayfası [K3], Beyaz İnşaat resmi kurumsal/proje sayfaları [K4], Babacan GYO kurumsal açıklaması ve portföyü [K1].

    25. Bir Projenin Adının Bu Tabloda Bulunması Ne Anlama Gelir?

    Tek başına hiçbir soruşturma sonucu doğurmaz.

    Bu listedeki proje isimleri şirketlerin kamuya açık portföylerinden alınmıştır.

    Dolayısıyla örneğin Rose Marine, Kalekent, Yedi Mavi, Skyport, Otoport, Beyaz Residence veya Babacan Port Royal gibi bir projeden taşınmaz alınmış olması, o taşınmazın soruşturma konusu 274 veya 687 işlemden biri olduğunu göstermez.

    Bunun anlaşılabilmesi için yatırımcının ada, parsel, bağımsız bölüm, satış tarihi, satıcı tüzel kişilik, değerleme şirketi, değerleme uzmanı, uygunluk belgesi ve ödeme zinciri üzerinden dosyasının bireysel olarak eşleştirilmesi gerekir.

    26. 30 Şirkete Kayyum Atandı: Bu 30 Şirketin Tam Listesi Açıklandı mı?

    İkinci dalga soruşturmayla ilgili Başsavcılık açıklamasında 30 anonim şirkete el konulduğu ve kayyum atandığı kamuoyuna açıklanmıştır. [H1] [H8]

    Ancak 28 Eylül 2026 itibarıyla incelediğimiz kamuya açık resmi açıklamalarda bu 30 anonim şirketin tamamının ticaret unvanlarının tek tek sıralandığı eksiksiz resmi bir liste yer almamaktadır.

    Bu nedenle sosyal medyada dolaşan farklı şirket listeleri, resmi savcılık veya hakimlik kararı görülmeden “30 şirketin resmi listesi” şeklinde yayımlanmamalıdır.

    27. Vatandaşlık Soruşturmasında Hangi Suçlar Gündeme Geliyor?

    21 ve 25 Eylül 2026 tarihli Başsavcılık açıklamalarını aktaran haberlerde soruşturmanın çeşitli şüpheliler yönünden şu suç tipleri çerçevesinde yürütüldüğü belirtilmiştir:

    Suç işlemek amacıyla örgüt kurma/yönetme/üyelik, göçmen kaçakçılığı, kamu kurum ve kuruluşlarının zararına dolandırıcılık, resmi belgede sahtecilik, özel belgede sahtecilik ve resmi belgenin düzenlenmesinde yalan beyan. [H1] [H8]

    Bu suçların her yatırımcıya veya her şirket çalışanına otomatik olarak isnat edildiği sonucu çıkarılmamalıdır. Ceza sorumluluğu şahsidir ve her şüpheli bakımından suçun maddi ve manevi unsurlarının ayrıca ispatlanması gerekir.

    28. Hakkında Ceza Soruşturması Açılması Vatandaşlığın İptal Edildiği Anlamına Gelir mi?

    Hayır.

    Ceza soruşturması ile vatandaşlık statüsünü sona erdiren idari işlem farklı hukuki süreçlerdir.

    Bununla birlikte yurt dışında bulunan ve kendisine herhangi bir tebligat ulaşmayan yatırımcı bakımından aynı proje veya satış zinciri hakkında ceza soruşturmasının başlaması, vatandaşlık dosyasının da idari incelemeye alınmış olabileceğine ilişkin önemli bir risk göstergesi olabilir.

    Kesin durumun anlaşılabilmesi için ceza soruşturması, yatırım uygunluk belgesi, TKGM dosyası ve Nüfus ve Vatandaşlık İşleri Genel Müdürlüğündeki statü ayrı ayrı kontrol edilmelidir.

    29. Vatandaşlık İptali veya Geri Alma Kararına Dava Açılabilir mi?

    Evet. Anayasa m.66 uyarınca vatandaşlık kanunun gösterdiği şartlarla kazanılır ve ancak kanunda belirtilen hallerde kaybedilir; vatandaşlıktan çıkarma ile ilgili karar ve işlemlere karşı yargı yolu kapatılamaz. [M7]

    İşlemin hangi makam tarafından tesis edildiği görevli mahkemenin belirlenmesinde önemlidir.

    Cumhurbaşkanı kararına karşı açılacak iptal davalarında 2575 sayılı Danıştay Kanunu m.24 uyarınca Danıştay ilk derece mahkemesi olarak görevlidir. [M8]

    2577 sayılı İdari Yargılama Usulü Kanunu m.7 uyarınca özel bir süre öngörülmediği hallerde Danıştay ve idare mahkemelerinde genel dava açma süresi 60 gündür ve yazılı bildirimi izleyen günden itibaren işlemeye başlar. [M9]

    İYUK m.11 kapsamında dava açmadan önce işlemin kaldırılması, geri alınması veya değiştirilmesi için idari başvuru yapılması belirli şartlarla dava süresinin işlemesini durdurabilir. Bu başvurunun her somut dosyada stratejik olarak uygun olup olmadığı ayrıca değerlendirilmelidir. [M10]

    30. Dava Açılması Vatandaşlık İptalini Kendiliğinden Durdurur mu?

    Hayır.

    İYUK m.27 uyarınca idari dava açılması, dava konusu idari işlemin yürütülmesini kendiliğinden durdurmaz.

    Yürütmenin durdurulması için kural olarak idari işlemin açıkça hukuka aykırı olması ve uygulanması halinde telafisi güç veya imkansız zarar doğması koşullarının birlikte bulunması gerekir. [M11]

    Vatandaşlığın sona ermesinin pasaport, seyahat, ikamet, aile statüsü, çalışma, şirket ortaklığı ve diğer haklara etkileri nedeniyle yürütmenin durdurulması talebinin somut dosya özelinde ayrıntılı gerekçelendirilmesi önem taşır.

    31. Vatandaşlığı İptal Edilen Kişinin Taşınmazına Ne Olur?

    Vatandaşlığın sona ermesi, taşınmazın kendiliğinden ve aynı anda Hazineye geçtiği anlamına gelmez.

    TVK m.33, vatandaşlığı iptal edilen kişinin mallarının tasfiyesinin gerekli görüldüğü hallerde bu hususun iptal kararında belirtilmesini düzenlemektedir. Aynı maddede iptal kararına karşı yargı yoluna başvurulması halinde tasfiye işlemlerinin dava sonuna bırakılması öngörülmektedir. [M1]

    Bununla birlikte taşınmaz mülkiyetinin yabancılar hukuku bakımından korunup korunamayacağı; kişinin eski vatandaşlığı, taşınmazın bulunduğu bölge, Tapu Kanunu ve yabancıların taşınmaz edinimine ilişkin diğer kurallar üzerinden ayrıca incelenmelidir.

    32. “Ben Gerçekten 400.000 Dolar Ödedim” Demek Yeterli mi?

    Hayır. Fakat bu son derece önemli bir başlangıç noktasıdır.

    Bugünkü soruşturmalarda yalnızca tapuda yazan rakama değil, paranın ekonomik gerçekliğine bakıldığı anlaşılmaktadır.

    Bu nedenle yatırımcının yalnızca kendi hesabından çıkan parayı değil, mümkün olduğunca paranın kaynağını, transfer zincirini, satıcının hesabına varışını ve paranın daha sonra kendisine veya bağlantılı kişilere dönmediğini gösterebilmesi önem taşır.

    Özellikle uluslararası SWIFT kayıtları, banka hesap ekstreleri, döviz alım belgeleri, satıcı hesap kayıtları ve aynı dönemdeki emsal satışlar kritik delillerdir.

    33. Dosyası Riskli Olan Yatırımcı Hangi Belgeleri Toplamalı?

    İlk aşamada vatandaşlığa esas bütün taşınmazların tapu kayıtları, resmi senetler, satış veya satış vaadi sözleşmeleri, eski ekspertiz/değerleme raporları, uygunluk belgeleri, döviz alım belgeleri, banka dekontları, SWIFT kayıtları, ödeme talimatları, taşınmaz satış faturaları, sözleşmeler, yatırımcının paranın kaynağını gösteren banka kayıtları, vatandaşlık başvuru evrakı ve vatandaşlık kararına ilişkin belgeler birlikte incelenmelidir.

    Varsa ceza soruşturması dosyasındaki bilirkişi raporlarının, MASAK değerlendirmelerinin, taşınmaz listelerinin ve şüpheli ifadelerinin yatırımcıya özgülenebilen kısımları ayrıca değerlendirilmelidir.

    34. En Kritik Hukuki Savunma Nedir?

    Her dosyada savunma aynı olmayacaktır. Ancak özellikle şu hukuki ayrımlar belirleyicidir:

    Bir: İptal mi uygulanmaktadır, geri alma mı?

    İki: İdarenin ileri sürdüğü sorun yatırımcının yalan beyanı/gizlemesi midir, yoksa yatırım şartının objektif olarak gerçekleşmediği iddiası mıdır?

    Üç: Yeni bilirkişi raporu işlem tarihindeki değeri mi tespit etmektedir, yoksa bugünkü değer üzerinden geçmişe ilişkin sonuç mu çıkarmaktadır?

    Dört: Yatırım gerçekten eksik midir, yoksa yalnızca eski yatırımın ispatında belge eksikliği mi vardır?

    Beş: Yatırımcı gerçekten gerekli bedeli kendi kaynağından ödemiş midir?

    Altı: Taşınmaz vatandaşlık kararının verildiği tarihte gerekli gerçek piyasa değerini taşıyor muydu?

    Yedi: İdarenin kullandığı yeni delil vatandaşlık kararından önce mevcut olan bir olguyu mu ortaya çıkarmaktadır, yoksa vatandaşlık sonrasında ortaya çıkan yeni bir olgu mudur?

    Sekiz: Eş ve çocukların vatandaşlığı yatırımcıya bağlı mı kazanılmıştır, yoksa daha sonra bağımsız bir hukuki sebebe mi dayanmaktadır?

    35. Danıştay’ın 2025 Kararı Neden Bu Dosyalar İçin Çok Önemli?

    Danıştay 10. Dairenin 26.06.2025 tarihli E.2022/7637, K.2025/3313 sayılı kararı, yatırım yoluyla vatandaşlık kazanmış bir aile hakkındaki geri alma uyuşmazlığında verilmiştir.

    Kararın en önemli yönü, TVK m.40’taki “hukuki şartlar oluşmadan” kavramına zaman bakımından sınır çizmesidir.

    Danıştay’a göre, vatandaşlık kararının geri alınmasını sağlayacak engel halin vatandaşlığa alınma tarihinde veya öncesinde mevcut olması gerekir. Vatandaşlıktan sonra gerçekleşen ve geçmiş dönemle bağlantısı kurulamayan yeni maddi veya hukuki olaylar, başlangıçtaki şartların oluşmadığını tek başına göstermez. [Y1]

    Bu yaklaşım özellikle 2026 yılında sonradan hazırlanan bilirkişi raporlarının değerlendirilmesinde önemlidir: Yeni delil kullanılabilir; fakat yeni delilin ispat etmeye çalıştığı maddi olgu geçmişte mevcut olmalıdır.

    36. Sonuç: Her Soruşturma Dosyası Aynı Değildir

    2026 yılındaki operasyonlar yatırım yoluyla vatandaşlık dosyalarında çok ciddi bir idari ve cezai denetim döneminin başladığını göstermektedir.

    Ancak “aynı şirketten ev aldı”, “aynı projeden aldı”, “eski ekspertiz raporu yeniden inceleniyor” veya “şirket yöneticileri hakkında soruşturma var” gibi tek bir olgudan hareketle bütün yatırımcılar bakımından aynı hukuki sonuca varılması mümkün değildir.

    Hukuken belirleyici olan; kişinin kendi satış işlemi, kendi ödeme zinciri, kendi taşınmazının gerçek tarihi değeri, kendi uygunluk belgesi, kendi vatandaşlık kararı ve varsa kendi ceza soruşturması bağlantısıdır.

    Özellikle gerçek bedeli banka yoluyla ödemiş, yatırım tutarını karar tarihinde fiilen sağlamış ve üçüncü kişilerin yaptığı iddia edilen usulsüzlüklerden haberdar olmayan yatırımcıların dosyalarının, gerçekte yatırım yapmaksızın yalnızca görünüşte para hareketi oluşturulduğu ileri sürülen dosyalardan ayrı değerlendirilmesi gerekir.

    Aynı şekilde şekli veya ispatla ilgili belge eksikliği ile geçmişte hiç gerçekleşmemiş maddi yatırım eksikliği birbirinden ayrılmalıdır.

    37. Sık Sorulan Sorular

    İdare yeniden ekspertiz isteyebilir mi?

    Evet. Vatandaşlık dosyasının yeniden araştırılması sırasında yeni bilirkişi veya değerleme incelemesi yapılabilir. Ancak geçmiş yatırım şartı bakımından önemli olan, taşınmazın ilgili işlem tarihindeki değeridir; bugünkü piyasa değeri geçmişteki değerin doğrudan yerine geçirilemez.

    Yeni ekspertiz eski ekspertizi geçersiz kılar mı?

    Kendiliğinden hayır. Her iki raporun yöntemi, değerleme tarihi, emsal verileri ve diğer ödeme/tapu kayıtları birlikte değerlendirilmelidir.

    Eksik yatırım sonradan tamamlanabilir mi?

    Gerçekte geçmişte yapılmış yatırımın belgesel eksikliği ile geçmişte hiç yapılmamış yatırım birbirinden ayrılmalıdır. Sonradan yapılan ödeme, geçmişte var olmayan maddi yatırım şartını kendiliğinden geçmişe dönük oluşturmaz.

    5901 sayılı Kanun m.39’daki “tamamlama” eksik 100.000 doları tamamlama anlamına gelir mi?

    Hayır. Hüküm, alınan karardaki maddi hata veya eksikliğin dayanağına uygun biçimde düzeltilmesi veya tamamlanmasına ilişkindir. Eksik yatırım tutarını yıllar sonra tamamlayarak geçmiş vatandaşlık kararını geriye dönük olarak hukuka uygun hale getiren genel bir düzenleme değildir.

    Askerlik yapan kişinin vatandaşlığı iptal edilebilir mi?

    Evet. Askerlik yapılmış olması tek başına iptali veya geri almayı engellemez. Ancak m.31 kapsamındaki iptal ileriye etkili olduğundan vatandaşlık dönemindeki işlemler Yönetmelik m.58 uyarınca korunur. Geri alma bakımından ise ayrıca değerlendirme gerekir.

    Eşin vatandaşlığı da gider mi?

    Yatırımcıya bağlı olarak vatandaşlık kazanan eş m.32 kapsamındadır. Ancak evlenme yoluyla daha sonra bağımsız biçimde Türk vatandaşlığı kazanan eş, Yönetmelik m.58/2 gereğince iptalden etkilenmez.

    Vatandaşlıktan sonra doğan çocuğun vatandaşlığı iptal edilir mi?

    Yönetmelik m.58/2’ye göre yatırımcı Türk vatandaşlığını kazandıktan sonra doğan çocuk, yatırımcının vatandaşlığının m.31 kapsamında iptalinden etkilenmez.

    21 Eylül soruşturmasındaki 55 çocuğun vatandaşlığı korunuyor mu?

    55 çocuğun “karar tarihinden sonra vatandaşlık kazandığı” açıklanmıştır. Bunun “karardan sonra doğdukları” anlamına gelip gelmediği kamuya açıklanmamıştır. Her çocuk bakımından doğum ve vatandaşlık kazanma tarihleri ayrı incelenmelidir.

    Şirket soruşturuluyorsa o şirketten ev alan herkes riskte midir?

    Dosyanın idari incelemeye alınması ihtimali bulunabilir; ancak şirket soruşturması tek başına her alıcının vatandaşlığının hukuka aykırı olduğu anlamına gelmez.

    Gül, LİV ve Beyaz projelerinin hangileri soruşturuluyor?

    28 Eylül 2026 itibarıyla 274 işlemin hangi projelere dağıldığını gösteren doğrulanmış kamuya açık resmi proje listesi yayımlanmamıştır.

    Vatandaşlık iptal kararına karşı dava süresi nedir?

    Özel bir süre bulunmayan idari uyuşmazlıklarda İYUK m.7 uyarınca genel süre 60 gündür. Sürenin başlangıcı, işlemin niteliği ve tebliğ şekli somut dosyada ayrıca incelenmelidir.

    Dava açınca vatandaşlık kararı durur mu?

    Hayır. Dava açılması işlemin yürütülmesini kendiliğinden durdurmaz. İYUK m.27 şartlarının bulunması halinde yürütmenin durdurulması talep edilebilir.

    38. Kaynaklar ve Hukuki Dayanaklar

    Mevzuat ve Resmi Kaynaklar

    [M1] 5901 sayılı Türk Vatandaşlığı Kanunu m.31, m.32 ve m.33.

    [M2] 5901 sayılı Türk Vatandaşlığı Kanunu m.38, m.39 ve m.40.

    [M3] Türk Vatandaşlığı Kanununun Uygulanmasına İlişkin Yönetmelik m.66 – vatandaşlık kararının geri alınması ve ilk karar tarihinden itibaren hükümsüzlük.

    [M4] Türk Vatandaşlığı Kanununun Uygulanmasına İlişkin Yönetmelik m.57 ve m.58 – iptal araştırması, eş ve çocuklara etki, vatandaşlık dönemindeki işlemler ve sonradan doğan çocuk istisnası.

    [M5] 5901 sayılı Türk Vatandaşlığı Kanunu m.39 – maddi hataların düzeltilmesi ve tamamlama.

    [M6] Türk Vatandaşlığı Kanununun Uygulanmasına İlişkin Yönetmelik m.65 – düzeltme ve tamamlama.

    [M7] Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasası m.66 – vatandaşlığın kazanılması ve kaybının kanuniliği ile yargı yolu.

    [M8] 2575 sayılı Danıştay Kanunu m.24 – Cumhurbaşkanı kararlarına karşı Danıştayın ilk derece görevi.

    [M9] 2577 sayılı İYUK m.7 – genel 60 günlük idari dava açma süresi.

    [M10] 2577 sayılı İYUK m.11 – üst makama/idareye başvuru ve dava süresine etkisi.

    [M11] 2577 sayılı İYUK m.27 – yürütmenin durdurulması şartları.

    Tapu ve Kadastro Kaynakları

    [T1] Tapu ve Kadastro Genel Müdürlüğü – 250.000 USD uygulamasından 400.000 USD uygulamasına geçişe ilişkin sıkça sorulan sorular.

    [T2] TKGM Yabancı İşler Dairesi Başkanlığı, 01.06.2022 tarihli Türk Vatandaşlığı Kanununun Uygulanmasına İlişkin Yönetmelik Değişikliği Hakkında Talimat.

    [T3] TKGM, 2024/4 sayılı Türk Vatandaşlığı Kanununun Uygulanmasına İlişkin Yönetmelik Hakkında Genelge ve eki Kılavuz.

    [T4] Your Key Türkiye / TKGM, Vatandaşlık Kazanımı – daha önce alınmış taşınmazlar, 250.000/400.000 USD tarihleri ve eksik yatırımın satış vaadi ile tamamlanmasına ilişkin açıklamalar.

    [T5] TKGM – Taşınmaz Edinim Sureti ile Vatandaşlık Kazanımına Esas Tutar Tespit Belgesi (TTB) düzenlemeleri.

    Danıştay Kararları

    [Y1] Danıştay 10. Daire, 26.06.2025, E.2022/7637, K.2025/3313 – TVK m.40 kapsamında hukuki şartların vatandaşlığa alınma tarihi itibarıyla değerlendirilmesi.

    [Y2] Danıştay 10. Daire, 12.12.2024, E.2020/5861, K.2024/6304 – vatandaşlık amacıyla gayrimenkul ediniminde değerleme raporu ve tapudaki satış bedeline ilişkin uyuşmazlık.

    [Y3] Danıştay 10. Daire, 23.06.2025, E.2021/279, K.2025/3174 – vatandaşlık kararının geri alınmasının sebep ve hukuki şartlarına ilişkin değerlendirme.

    Askerlik Kaynakları

    [A1] T.C. Millî Savunma Bakanlığı Askeralma Genel Müdürlüğü – Vatandaşlık İşlemleri; Türk vatandaşlığını kaybedenler ve yeniden vatandaşlığa alınanlar.

    [A2] Askeralma Yönetmeliği m.90 ve MSB Sıkça Sorulan Sorular – önceki askerlik safahatının dikkate alınması.

    Akademik Kaynaklar

    [D1] Çiçek Özgür, “Yatırım Yoluyla Kazanılan Türk Vatandaşlığının İptali ve Geri Alınması”, Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, C.75, S.1, 2026, s.741-779.

    [D2] Mesut Aygün / Gülser Banu Uslu Yiğit, “Yabancıların Yatırım Yoluyla Türk Vatandaşlığı Kazanmalarının Hukuki Yönden Değerlendirilmesi ve Yeni Model Önerisi”, Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, C.34, S.1, 2026.

    [D3] Cemil Güner, “Türk Vatandaşlığının Kazanılması ve Kaybı Kararlarının Geri Alınması”, Milletlerarası Hukuk ve Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk Bülteni, C.37, S.2.

    [D4] Hümeyra Zeynep Erden, “Türk Vatandaşlığına Alınma Kararının İptalinde Süre”, Milletlerarası Hukuk ve Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk Bülteni, C.36, S.1.

    2026 Güncel Haber ve Soruşturma Kaynakları

    [H1] Anadolu Ajansı, 21.09.2026 – İstanbul merkezli “usulsüz vatandaşlık” operasyonunda 73 şüphelinin yakalanması; 1.070 kişi, 274 satış, MASAK ve bilirkişi incelemeleri.

    [H2] TRT Haber, 21.09.2026 – ikinci dalga operasyon; Babacan bağlantılı ilk dalga ile Gül İnşaat AŞ, Beyaz İnşaat ve LİV İnşaat üzerinden yürütülen ikinci dalgaya ilişkin açıklama.

    [H3] TRT Haber, 21.09.2026 – İçişleri Bakanlığının 6.134 kişi, 1.393 kişi, 1.070 kişi ve 55 çocuk hakkındaki açıklamasının aktarılması.

    [H4] Habertürk, 21.09.2026 – usulsüz vatandaşlık soruşturmasında ikinci dalga, 30 şirkete kayyum ve üç şirket üzerinden incelenen satışlar.

    [H5] Ekotürk, 21.09.2026 – gayrimenkul üzerinden usulsüz vatandaşlık soruşturması ve 3,5 milyar TL’yi aşan işlem büyüklüğü.

    [H6] Habertürk / Anadolu Ajansı, 21.09.2026 – İçişleri Bakanlığının 5.391 iptal, 743 geri alma ve toplam 6.134 kişi hakkındaki verileri.

    [H7] Anadolu Ajansı, 21.09.2026 – ikinci dalga soruşturma ve güncel operasyon ayrıntıları.

    [H8] Anadolu Ajansı, 25.09.2026 – 74 şüphelinin hakimlik işlemleri; 33 tutuklama, 20 konutu terk etmeme ve 21 diğer adli kontrol.

    [H9] T.C. Adalet Bakanlığı Basın ve Halkla İlişkiler Müşavirliği, 04.08.2026 – 687 kişinin vatandaşlığının iptali için yasal süreç başlatıldığına ilişkin Bakan açıklaması.

    [H10] Anadolu Ajansı, 07.08.2026 – ilk dalga soruşturmasında 80 şüpheliden 32’sinin tutuklanması.

    [H11] TRT Haber, 04.08.2026 – sahte ekspertiz iddiası, 687 vatandaşlık işlemi ve yaklaşık 2,5 milyar TL’lik işlem.

    [H12] Habertürk, 04.08.2026 – ilk dalga operasyon, 90 şüpheli hakkında gözaltı kararı ve 687 kişilik vatandaşlık süreci.

    [H13] Takvim, 21.09.2026 – haber kuruluşunun ulaştığını belirttiği şüpheli listesi ve listede yer alan şirket/unvan bağlantıları.

    [H14] Patronlar Dünyası, 21-22.09.2026 – Gül İnşaat, LİV Yapı ve Beyaz İnşaat’ın kurumsal ilişkileri ve proje portföyleri; 274 satışın şirket/proje dağılımının kamuoyuna açıklanmadığına ilişkin değerlendirme.

    [H15] DHA, 21.09.2026 – ikinci dalga operasyon, 1.070 vatandaşlık ve soruşturma verileri; DHA içeriği çeşitli haber kuruluşlarınca yeniden yayımlanmıştır.

    [H16] Yeni Asır / DHA, 21.09.2026 – ikinci dalga vatandaşlık soruşturması ve 1.070 kişi verisi.

    [H17] Haber3 / DHA, 21.09.2026 – 73 gözaltı, 1.070 kişi ve 72.250.000 USD tutarındaki işlemlere ilişkin haber.

    [H18] Memurlar.net, 21.09.2026 – İçişleri Bakanlığının 6.134 kişi ve 55 çocuk hakkındaki açıklamasının aktarılması.

    [H19] Yeni Birlik, 21.09.2026 – ikinci dalga operasyon ve 30 şirkete kayyum haberleri.

    [H20] CNN Türk kaynaklı haber akışı, 21.09.2026 – 1.070 kişinin vatandaşlık statüsüne ilişkin idari süreç ve 72.250.000 USD işlem tutarı.

    Şirketlerin Kendi Kurumsal Kaynakları

    [K1] Babacan GYO kurumsal internet sitesi – İstanbul Cumhuriyet Başsavcılığının 2026/132798 sayılı soruşturması kapsamında kayyum atandığı açıklanan 12 şirket ve Babacan proje portföyü.

    [K2] Gül İnşaat kurumsal internet sitesi – tamamlanan projeler ve şirket tarihçesi.

    [K3] LİV Yapı kurumsal internet sitesi – Yedi Mavi, Avangart İstanbul, LİV Büyükçekmece, LİV Marmara, LİV Marine Villa, Otoport, Kalekent ve diğer proje portföyü.

    [K4] Beyaz İnşaat kurumsal internet sitesi – şirket tarihçesi ve Beyaz Residence, Beyaz Kent, Beyaz City, White Corner, BeyCity, White Court, Beyaz Konaklar, Bakırköy Konakları, Beyaz Center ve diğer projeler.

    Hukuki Bilgilendirme ve Masumiyet Karinesi

    Bu yazı 28 Eylül 2026 tarihi itibarıyla kamuya açık mevzuat, mahkeme kararları, resmi açıklamalar, akademik çalışmalar ve haber kaynakları esas alınarak hazırlanmıştır.

    Soruşturmalarda adı geçen şirketler, yöneticiler, çalışanlar veya diğer kişiler hakkında soruşturma yürütülmesi, haklarında kesinleşmiş mahkumiyet kararı bulunduğu anlamına gelmez. Kesinleşmiş mahkeme kararı bulunmadıkça kişiler suçlu kabul edilemez.

    Aynı şekilde bir şirketin soruşturmada yer alması, o şirketin gerçekleştirdiği bütün projelerin, bütün taşınmazların veya bütün yabancı yatırımcı satışlarının usulsüz olduğu anlamına gelmez.

    Yatırım yoluyla kazanılmış Türk vatandaşlığı dosyalarında somut hukuki değerlendirme; vatandaşlık tarihi, taşınmazın işlem tarihindeki değeri, tapu kayıtları, ödeme belgeleri, ekspertiz raporları, uygunluk belgesi, banka hareketleri ve varsa soruşturma dosyasındaki yatırımcıya özgülenebilir deliller birlikte incelenerek yapılmalıdır.


    TD Hukuk ve Danışmanlık

    Av. Murat Can Dolğun
    İstanbul Barosu
    TD Hukuk ve Danışmanlık – İstanbul
    Telefon: +90 212 299 44 22
    Web: td-lawfirm.com

    Vatandaşlık iptali, vatandaşlık kararının geri alınması, gayrimenkul yatırımının yeniden incelenmesi ve bağlantılı ceza soruşturmaları hakkında hukuki inceleme yapılabilmesi için vatandaşlık dosyası ile taşınmaz, ekspertiz ve ödeme belgelerinin birlikte değerlendirilmesi gerekmektedir.

  • 1,070 PEOPLE FACING TURKISH CITIZENSHIP CANCELLATION PROCEEDINGS IN 2026:A COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL GUIDE FOR REAL ESTATE INVESTORS

    1,070 PEOPLE FACING TURKISH CITIZENSHIP CANCELLATION PROCEEDINGS IN 2026:A COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL GUIDE FOR REAL ESTATE INVESTORS

    Updated: 26 September 2026

    INTRODUCTION: WE HAD ALREADY WARNED ABOUT THE DEVELOPING CITIZENSHIP CANCELLATION ISSUE

    On 19 September 2026, we published a detailed legal analysis concerning the cancellation and withdrawal of Turkish citizenship acquired through investment.

    In that article, we examined false or allegedly inflated property valuation reports, sham real estate transactions, the legal position of good-faith investors, the distinction between cancellation under Article 31 of Turkish Citizenship Law No. 5901 and withdrawal under Article 40, and the judicial remedies available against citizenship-related administrative decisions.

    Our previous detailed analysis is available here:

    Only two days after that publication, a major new development substantially expanded the scope of the issue.

    On 21 September 2026, Turkish authorities announced a new investigation concerning real estate transactions through which 1,070 persons were stated to have acquired Turkish citizenship.

    According to the Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office, the investigation concerns allegations including sham property sales, financial transactions that did not reflect genuine investment payments, and property valuation reports allegedly showing values substantially higher than the actual value of the properties.

    Source:
    Anadolu Agency, 21 September 2026
    https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/gundem/istanbul-merkezli-usulsuz-vatandaslik-operasyonunda-73-zanli-yakalandi/4062988

    For investors potentially affected by this investigation, the most important question is now:

    “If I am one of the 1,070 people identified in this investigation, has my Turkish citizenship already been cancelled?”

    The answer requires a careful legal distinction.

    The public announcement did not state that all 1,070 persons had already received final individual decisions cancelling their Turkish citizenship.

    The Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office stated that the necessary administrative process had been initiated for the cancellation of citizenship considered to have been acquired irregularly.

    Source:
    https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/gundem/istanbul-merkezli-usulsuz-vatandaslik-operasyonunda-73-zanli-yakalandi/4062988

    This wording is legally significant.

    Being identified within a criminal investigation, being subjected to an administrative review, having an investment conformity determination reconsidered, receiving an individual administrative decision concerning citizenship, and challenging that decision before the administrative courts are separate legal stages.

    Accordingly, an investor who has been told that he or she is “among the 1,070 people” should not determine his or her legal status solely from general news reports.

    The individual citizenship file must be examined.

    I. WHAT EXACTLY IS THE 1,070-PERSON TURKISH CITIZENSHIP INVESTIGATION?

    The investigation is being conducted by the Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office.

    According to the official information reported by Anadolu Agency, the authorities evaluated Land Registry and Cadastre records, expert reports, MASAK financial analyses and other documents together.

    The Prosecutor’s Office stated that, in certain transactions:

    • the foreign currency required for Turkish citizenship had allegedly not genuinely entered Türkiye;
    • purchase and sale transactions had allegedly been structured using the financial resources of intermediary companies or sellers;
    • sham or collusive property transactions had allegedly been created;
    • and artificially high valuation reports had allegedly been prepared in relation to certain properties.

    Source:
    https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/gundem/istanbul-merkezli-usulsuz-vatandaslik-operasyonunda-73-zanli-yakalandi/4062988

    According to the same official statement, transactions totalling approximately USD 72.25 million were considered to have been carried out on a sham or collusive basis.

    The Minister of Justice also referred to transactions exceeding TRY 3.5 billion in the second phase of the investigation.

    Source:
    https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/gundem/istanbul-merkezli-usulsuz-vatandaslik-operasyonunda-73-zanli-yakalandi/4062988

    This demonstrates an important point:

    The current investigation is not limited to the question of whether a valuation report was accurate.

    For an affected investor, the legal review may require examination of:

    the title deed,

    the purchase agreement,

    the valuation report,

    the Certificate of Conformity,

    bank statements,

    SWIFT records,

    the source of the investment funds,

    the amount actually received by the seller,

    any subsequent repayment of funds,

    and the complete citizenship application file.

    The real economic and legal substance of each individual investment is therefore critical.

    II. THE 1,070 PEOPLE ARE NOT 1,070 PRINCIPAL INVESTORS

    One of the most important facts disclosed by the authorities concerns the composition of the 1,070-person group.

    According to the information released by the Ministry of Interior and reported by Anadolu Agency:

    263 persons are principal investors.

    807 persons are family members.

    This gives a total of 1,070 persons.

    The authorities further stated that 1,015 persons acquired Turkish citizenship at the time of the original citizenship decision, while 55 children acquired Turkish citizenship after that decision.

    Source:
    https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/gundem/istanbul-merkezli-usulsuz-vatandaslik-operasyonunda-73-zanli-yakalandi/4062988

    Accordingly, it would be inaccurate to describe the matter as involving “1,070 investors”.

    It concerns 263 principal investors together with 807 family members.

    This distinction has substantial legal importance because the status of the principal investor and the citizenship status of a spouse or child may require separate examination.

    III. HAS THE TURKISH CITIZENSHIP OF ALL 1,070 PEOPLE ALREADY BEEN CANCELLED?

    Based on the official information currently available, it would not be accurate to state that all 1,070 persons have already received final individual cancellation decisions.

    The wording publicly used by the authorities is that:

    the necessary administrative process for the cancellation of citizenship has been initiated.

    Source:
    https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/gundem/istanbul-merkezli-usulsuz-vatandaslik-operasyonunda-73-zanli-yakalandi/4062988

    This distinction should not be treated as a technicality.

    There may be several separate stages:

    1. Identification in the investigation.
    2. Administrative examination of the investment.
    3. Examination of the Certificate of Conformity.
    4. Examination of the citizenship file.
    5. Issuance of an individual administrative decision.
    6. Notification of that decision.
    7. Judicial review before the competent administrative court.

    Accordingly, a person who believes that he or she falls within the 1,070-person group should first determine the exact current stage of the individual file.

    IV. IS THERE AN OFFICIAL PUBLIC LIST OF THE 1,070 PEOPLE?

    This point requires particular caution.

    Various lists are currently circulating on social media and through private messaging groups, and some of these documents are being presented as lists of persons allegedly included in the 1,070-person investigation.

    However, in the official public statements referred to in this article, the authorities have not published a complete list containing the names of all 1,070 persons.

    The official announcements disclose the number of affected persons, the number of principal investors and family members, and general information concerning the investigation.

    They do not publish a complete official name list.

    Official source:
    https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/gundem/istanbul-merkezli-usulsuz-vatandaslik-operasyonunda-73-zanli-yakalandi/4062988

    Accordingly, lists circulating on social media should NOT be treated as an official confirmation that a particular person is or is not included in the investigation.

    The accuracy, completeness and source of such lists are not presently confirmed by the official announcements cited in this article.

    They may contain incomplete information, outdated information, spelling differences, duplicated names or persons who are not actually subject to an individual citizenship measure.

    For this reason, the existence of a person’s name on a social media list should be treated only as information requiring verification.

    Likewise, the absence of a name from an unofficial list does not prove that the person is outside the scope of the administrative investigation.

    The correct approach is to verify the individual’s position through official citizenship records, the relevant administrative file and, where necessary, the underlying investigation records.

    In short:

    A social media list is not an administrative decision.

    It is not an official citizenship record.

    It is not proof that citizenship has been cancelled.

    Each case must be verified individually.

    V. WHY THE ACTUAL BANK PAYMENT MAY BE ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUES

    One of the central allegations in the investigation concerns the reality of the investment payments.

    According to the Prosecutor’s Office, in certain transactions the required foreign currency allegedly did not genuinely enter Türkiye, and financial arrangements were allegedly created using resources belonging to sellers or intermediary entities.

    Source:
    https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/gundem/istanbul-merkezli-usulsuz-vatandaslik-operasyonunda-73-zanli-yakalandi/4062988

    This makes the actual movement of funds extremely important.

    A genuine investor may have:

    paid the full purchase price from his or her own bank account;

    used genuine personal or commercial funds;

    transferred the funds directly to the seller;

    received no undisclosed refund;

    genuinely acquired the property;

    and had no knowledge of or involvement in any allegedly irregular structure.

    That factual situation is materially different from a transaction in which the required investment capital was only made to appear to originate from the investor.

    Therefore, the analysis should not normally stop with one bank transfer receipt.

    The entire transaction may need to be reconstructed:

    source of funds
    → investor’s bank account
    → transfer to seller
    → receipt by seller
    → subsequent movement of funds.

    Complete bank statements, SWIFT documents and evidence of the source of funds may become highly important evidence.

    VI. “I DID NOT PREPARE THE VALUATION REPORT”

    This issue may be particularly important where Article 31 of Turkish Citizenship Law No. 5901 is relied upon.

    Article 31 concerns cancellation of the decision granting Turkish citizenship where citizenship was acquired as a result of a false statement by the person concerned or the concealment of material matters forming the basis of the acquisition.

    The Directorate General of Population and Citizenship Affairs similarly explains that an investigation is conducted and that citizenship may be cancelled where concealment of matters forming the basis of the acquisition is clearly established.

    Official source:
    T.C. Ministry of Interior
    Directorate General of Population and Citizenship Affairs
    https://www.nvi.gov.tr/kurumlar/nvi.gov.tr/mevzuat/nufusmevzuat/genelge/5901Sayili_Turk_Vatandasligi_Kanuna_Gore_Aciklama2009.pdf

    This distinction matters.

    An allegation that a valuation expert prepared a false or inaccurate valuation report does not, by itself, establish that the investor knew the report was false.

    Likewise, an allegation concerning acts by a seller, intermediary or third party does not, without further evidence, establish that every investor knowingly participated in those acts.

    Where Article 31 is relied upon, the following questions may therefore become important:

    What false statement did the investor personally make?

    What material fact did the investor conceal?

    Did the investor know that the valuation was allegedly inaccurate?

    Did the investor request that the stated value be increased?

    Did the investor receive any undisclosed return of the purchase price?

    Did the investor submit any document knowing that it was false?

    These questions concern the individual investor’s conduct.

    VII. GOOD FAITH IS IMPORTANT — BUT IT MAY NOT ANSWER EVERY LEGAL QUESTION

    A different legal issue arises under Article 40 of Turkish Citizenship Law No. 5901.

    Article 31 and Article 40 should not be treated as interchangeable provisions.

    Article 31 is primarily concerned with false statements or concealment attributable to the person concerned.

    Article 40 concerns the withdrawal of a citizenship decision where it is subsequently determined that the legal conditions for the decision were not satisfied.

    An investor may therefore have acted entirely in good faith.

    The investor may never have met the valuation expert.

    The investor may have relied upon the developer, advisers and official administrative documents.

    There may nevertheless be a separate legal question:

    Did the property genuinely satisfy the statutory investment requirement applicable at the relevant time?

    Accordingly, a complete defence should generally address two separate questions:

    1. Did the investor personally participate in any false statement, concealment or irregularity?
    2. Were the objective legal conditions for the acquisition of Turkish citizenship actually satisfied?

    We discussed the distinction between cancellation under Article 31 and withdrawal under Article 40 in greater detail in our previous article:

    VIII. THE HISTORICAL VALUE OF THE PROPERTY MAY BE CRITICAL

    Where the original valuation report is challenged, the relevant question is not necessarily:

    “What is this property worth today?”

    The relevant question may instead be:

    “What was the true market value of this property on the relevant investment date?”

    This distinction can be decisive.

    An allegedly inaccurate valuation report does not necessarily mean that the property itself was below the statutory investment threshold.

    A retrospective valuation may therefore become necessary.

    Such an assessment may consider:

    historical comparable sales;

    other units sold in the same development;

    floor area;

    floor level;

    location;

    view;

    state of completion;

    historical exchange rates;

    Land Registry data;

    and market conditions prevailing on the relevant date.

    The investment should be assessed under the factual conditions existing when it was made.

    IX. THE CURRENT USD 400,000 THRESHOLD SHOULD NOT SIMPLY BE APPLIED TO HISTORICAL INVESTMENTS

    The real estate investment threshold for Turkish citizenship has changed over time.

    Accordingly, an investment made under an earlier legal regime must be assessed under the rules applicable to that investment at the relevant time.

    The current USD 400,000 requirement should not simply be applied retrospectively to every historical citizenship file.

    The following dates may therefore be important:

    the property purchase date;

    the payment date;

    the valuation report date;

    the Certificate of Conformity date;

    the citizenship application date;

    and the citizenship decision date.

    The applicable legislation must then be determined according to the chronology of the individual case.

    X. WHY THE CERTIFICATE OF CONFORMITY MATTERS

    Citizenship by investment is not based solely upon a private declaration by the investor.

    The investment must pass through administrative procedures and the relevant competent authority issues a Certificate of Conformity where the statutory investment requirements are considered satisfied.

    The Directorate General of Population and Citizenship Affairs expressly regulates the role of the conformity determination in exceptional citizenship applications made by foreign investors.

    Official source:
    https://nvi.gov.tr/kurumlar/nvi.gov.tr/mevzuat/nufusmevzuat/talimat/yabanci-yatirimcilarin-istisnai-olarak-turk-vatandasligini-kazanmalarina-iliskin-usul-ve-esaslar.pdf

    The existence of a Certificate of Conformity does not necessarily mean that the citizenship decision can never subsequently be reviewed.

    However, it is legally significant that the investment was previously examined within an official administrative process.

    A later review must therefore consider both:

    the new evidence now relied upon by the authorities;

    and the earlier administrative determinations on which the investor relied.

    XI. FAMILY MEMBERS: WHAT HAPPENS TO SPOUSES AND CHILDREN?

    This question is particularly important because 807 of the 1,070 persons identified by the authorities are family members.

    Source:
    https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/gundem/istanbul-merkezli-usulsuz-vatandaslik-operasyonunda-73-zanli-yakalandi/4062988

    Under Turkish citizenship legislation, cancellation of a citizenship acquisition decision may also have consequences for spouses and children who acquired citizenship in connection with the principal applicant.

    The official guidance issued by the Directorate General of Population and Citizenship Affairs addresses the effects of cancellation upon persons who acquired citizenship through the person concerned.

    Official source:
    https://www.nvi.gov.tr/kurumlar/nvi.gov.tr/mevzuat/nufusmevzuat/genelge/5901Sayili_Turk_Vatandasligi_Kanuna_Gore_Aciklama2009.pdf

    However, each family member’s citizenship history should still be examined.

    This is particularly important because the Ministry stated that 55 children within the relevant group acquired citizenship after the original citizenship decision.

    Therefore, the precise date and legal basis on which each spouse or child became a Turkish citizen should be established individually.

    XII. WHAT HAPPENED AFTER THE 21 SEPTEMBER OPERATION?

    The criminal investigation remains active.

    On 25 September 2026, Anadolu Agency reported that judicial procedures concerning 74 detained suspects had been completed.

    Thirty-three suspects were remanded in custody.

    Twenty suspects were subjected to a judicial-control measure requiring them not to leave their residence.

    Source:
    Anadolu Agency, 25 September 2026
    https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/gundem/istanbul-merkezli-usulsuz-vatandaslik-operasyonunda-yakalanan-33-supheli-tutuklandi/4068739

    These are criminal-procedure measures.

    A remand decision is not a final criminal conviction.

    Likewise, criminal proceedings involving sellers, intermediaries, valuation professionals or other suspects are legally distinct from an administrative determination concerning the citizenship status of an individual investor.

    Evidence from the criminal investigation may be relevant to the citizenship proceedings.

    However, the legal position of each investor must still be individually assessed.

    XIII. ASSET MEASURES DO NOT MEAN THAT EVERY INVESTOR’S PROPERTY HAS BEEN SEIZED

    The authorities announced measures involving:

    2,011 properties;

    one hotel;

    86 motor vehicles;

    two yachts;

    42 bank accounts;

    and 30 companies.

    Source:
    https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/gundem/istanbul-merkezli-usulsuz-vatandaslik-operasyonunda-73-zanli-yakalandi/4062988

    These figures should not be misunderstood.

    They do not establish that the property of every person within the 1,070-person group has been seized.

    Whether a particular investor’s property is subject to a restriction, seizure, annotation or another measure must be checked through that person’s own official records.

    A criminal asset-protection measure and an administrative citizenship decision are separate legal matters.

    XIV. WHAT SHOULD AN INVESTOR DO IF HE OR SHE MAY BE AMONG THE 1,070 PEOPLE?

    The first task should be to establish the exact legal and administrative status of the individual case.

    Questions to be answered include:

    Am I actually included in the relevant investigation?

    Is my citizenship file merely under examination?

    Has any action been taken concerning my Certificate of Conformity?

    Has an individual citizenship decision been issued?

    If so, what is its legal basis?

    Has the decision been formally notified to me?

    What specific transaction or document is the administration relying upon?

    Was my payment genuine and traceable?

    Did my property satisfy the required investment value at the relevant historical date?

    Was I personally involved in any alleged valuation or financial irregularity?

    What is the separate citizenship status of my spouse and children?

    XV. DOCUMENTS THAT SHOULD BE PRESERVED AND REVIEWED

    Potentially affected investors should consider assembling the complete investment and citizenship record.

    Important documents may include:

    title deed records;

    property sale contracts;

    valuation reports;

    Certificate of Conformity;

    bank transfer receipts;

    complete bank account statements;

    SWIFT records;

    foreign exchange documents;

    invoices;

    proof of source of funds;

    communications with sellers or intermediaries;

    citizenship application documents;

    the citizenship decision;

    and citizenship records relating to spouses and children.

    Particular attention should be given to historical banking records because such documents can become more difficult to obtain with the passage of time.

    XVI. WHAT IF THE INVESTOR IS CURRENTLY OUTSIDE TÜRKİYE?

    A citizenship review should not automatically be equated with a criminal restriction on travel.

    Being identified within a citizenship-related investigation does not, by itself, establish the existence of:

    an arrest warrant;

    a detention order;

    a judicial-control measure;

    or another individual criminal restriction.

    Accordingly, an investor abroad should not assess the risks of travelling to Türkiye solely on the basis of having been told that he or she is “one of the 1,070”.

    The following matters should be separately verified:

    current citizenship status;

    any individual administrative citizenship decision;

    any criminal investigation concerning the investor;

    any arrest or judicial restriction;

    and the immigration consequences if Turkish citizenship has already been affected.

    XVII. CAN A CITIZENSHIP CANCELLATION OR WITHDRAWAL DECISION BE CHALLENGED?

    Yes.

    A citizenship cancellation or withdrawal decision constitutes an administrative act and is subject to judicial review under Turkish administrative law.

    The precise legal remedy, competent court, time limit and any application for a stay of execution must be assessed according to the individual decision and the authority that issued it.

    This is another reason why the legal basis of the decision must first be established.

    A decision based on Article 31 and a decision based on Article 40 raise different legal questions.

    They should not simply be described by the single English word “revocation” without identifying the Turkish-law mechanism actually being used.

    XVIII. THE CENTRAL QUESTION FOR THE 1,070 PEOPLE

    The central legal question is not merely:

    “Was there irregularity somewhere within the wider transaction structure?”

    The relevant questions are individual:

    Was this investor’s payment genuine?

    Where did the money originate?

    Did the seller actually receive the money?

    Was any amount returned?

    What was the property’s true value at the relevant historical date?

    Did the investor know about any alleged valuation irregularity?

    Did the investor make a false statement?

    Did the investor conceal any material fact?

    Were the objective statutory investment conditions actually satisfied?

    What did the competent public authorities determine when the Certificate of Conformity was originally issued?

    What new evidence is now relied upon to alter the earlier administrative position?

    CONCLUSION: “1,070 PEOPLE” DOES NOT MEAN 1,070 IDENTICAL CASES

    The investigation announced on 21 September 2026 is one of the most significant recent developments concerning Turkish citizenship acquired through real estate investment.

    According to the information released by the authorities, the relevant group consists of:

    263 principal investors;

    807 family members;

    1,070 persons in total.

    Source:
    https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/gundem/istanbul-merkezli-usulsuz-vatandaslik-operasyonunda-73-zanli-yakalandi/4062988

    However, a large-scale investigation does not transform hundreds of separate investments into one single legal case.

    Each investor’s position must be examined individually.

    The analysis should include:

    the legislation applicable on the investment date;

    the genuine movement of funds;

    the historical value of the property;

    the valuation report;

    the Certificate of Conformity;

    the investor’s own declarations and conduct;

    any alleged return or circular movement of funds;

    the legal position of spouses and children;

    and the precise factual and statutory grounds relied upon by the administration.

    The existence of an investigation involving third parties does not, by itself, determine whether a particular investor acquired Turkish citizenship unlawfully.

    Equally, good faith alone may not resolve every possible issue where the authorities allege that an objective statutory investment requirement was not satisfied.

    The correct legal method is therefore to reconstruct the individual investment and citizenship file, determine the statutory basis relied upon by the administration and test the allegations against the investor’s actual documents.

    For our earlier comprehensive legal analysis concerning Turkish citizenship acquired by investment, cancellation, withdrawal, alleged false valuation reports, sham transactions and good-faith investors, see:

    TD LAW FIRM

    TD Law Firm advises and represents foreign investors in matters concerning Turkish citizenship by investment, administrative review of citizenship files, cancellation and withdrawal proceedings, Certificate of Conformity disputes, real estate valuation issues, alleged sham transactions and related administrative litigation.

    In cases potentially connected with the 1,070-person investigation announced on 21 September 2026, the legal assessment should be based on the investor’s individual citizenship, property, valuation and banking records rather than general media reports or unverified lists circulating on social media.

    Av. Murat Can Dolğun
    Istanbul Bar Association – Registration No. 75860

    TD Law Firm

    Tel: +90 212 299 44 22
    WhatsApp: +90 507 475 44 22
    E-mail: av.muratcandolgun@gmail.com
    Website: https://dolgun.av.tr

    Address:
    Istanbul World Trade Center (İDTM)
    A2 Block, No: 206
    Bakırköy / Istanbul, Türkiye

    LEGAL NOTICE

    This article is provided for general legal information only and does not constitute individual legal advice or a guarantee of any particular outcome.

    The legal position of each investor must be assessed by reference to the individual administrative file, investment documents, banking records, citizenship records and the legislation applicable at the relevant time.

    In particular, names appearing on lists circulated through social media, messaging applications or other unofficial channels should not be regarded as official confirmation of inclusion in the 1,070-person investigation unless and until the individual position is verified through official records.

    SOURCES

    1. Anadolu Agency – 21 September 2026
      Istanbul-centred investigation concerning allegedly irregular acquisition of Turkish citizenship:
      https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/gundem/istanbul-merkezli-usulsuz-vatandaslik-operasyonunda-73-zanli-yakalandi/4062988
    2. Anadolu Agency – 25 September 2026
      33 suspects remanded in custody:
      https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/gundem/istanbul-merkezli-usulsuz-vatandaslik-operasyonunda-yakalanan-33-supheli-tutuklandi/4068739
    3. T.C. Ministry of Interior – Directorate General of Population and Citizenship Affairs
      Official guidance concerning Turkish Citizenship Law No. 5901:
      https://www.nvi.gov.tr/kurumlar/nvi.gov.tr/mevzuat/nufusmevzuat/genelge/5901Sayili_Turk_Vatandasligi_Kanuna_Gore_Aciklama2009.pdf
    4. T.C. Ministry of Interior – Directorate General of Population and Citizenship Affairs
      Procedures and Principles Regarding Exceptional Acquisition of Turkish Citizenship by Foreign Investors:
      https://nvi.gov.tr/kurumlar/nvi.gov.tr/mevzuat/nufusmevzuat/talimat/yabanci-yatirimcilarin-istisnai-olarak-turk-vatandasligini-kazanmalarina-iliskin-usul-ve-esaslar.pdf
    5. Previous detailed legal analysis – Av. Murat Can Dolğun
      https://dolgun.av.tr/2026/09/19/yatirim-yoluyla-turk-vatandasliginin-iptali-geri-alinmasi/
  • Military Service After Acquiring Turkish Citizenship: The 22-Year Rule, Exemption and Deferment (2026)

    Military Service After Acquiring Turkish Citizenship: The 22-Year Rule, Exemption and Deferment (2026)

    Last updated: 14 September 2026

    One of the most common questions asked by foreign nationals who acquire Turkish citizenship is whether they will be required to perform compulsory military service in Türkiye.

    This issue is particularly important for men who acquire Turkish citizenship through investment, marriage, long-term residence or a decision of the competent Turkish authorities.

    The short answer is:

    Men who acquire Turkish citizenship and are 22 years of age or older in the year in which they become Turkish citizens are, as a general rule, deemed to have completed their military service in Türkiye.

    Men who are 21 or younger in the year they acquire Turkish citizenship, however, may become subject to Turkish military service unless another exemption applies.

    The principal legal provision governing this issue is Article 43 of Military Recruitment Law No. 7179 (Askeralma Kanunu).

    Official text of Law No. 7179:
    https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2019/06/20190626-1.htm

    Official information published by the Turkish Ministry of National Defence:
    https://www.msb.gov.tr/Askeralma/icerik/vatandaslik-islemleri

    Does Everyone Who Acquires Turkish Citizenship Have to Perform Military Service?

    No.

    Under Article 43 of Military Recruitment Law No. 7179, the military service status of a person who subsequently acquires Turkish citizenship depends primarily on his age in the year citizenship is acquired and on other circumstances specified by law.

    Two categories are particularly important.

    A person may be deemed to have completed his military service if:

    1. he is 22 years of age or older in the year in which he acquires Turkish citizenship, or
    2. before acquiring Turkish citizenship, he completed military service in his country of origin or was legally deemed to have completed it and can provide the required evidence.

    Accordingly, a person does not necessarily need to have previously served in another country’s military in order to benefit from the 22-year rule.

    The Most Important Rule: How Is the Age of 22 Calculated?

    This is one of the most important practical points.

    For this purpose, the Turkish Ministry of National Defence does not calculate age according to whether the person’s birthday has already occurred on the exact date Turkish citizenship is acquired.

    Instead, the year of birth is used.

    According to the Ministry’s official guidance, the calculation is made by adding 22 to the person’s year of birth. The month and day of birth are not taken into consideration.

    Official MSB guidance:
    https://www.msb.gov.tr/Askeralma/icerik/vatandaslik-islemleri

    Example: A Man Born in 2004 Acquires Turkish Citizenship in 2026

    2004 + 22 = 2026.

    Therefore, a man born in 2004 who acquires Turkish citizenship at any time during 2026 falls within the 22-year rule.

    Subject to the specific exceptions provided by law, he will therefore be deemed to have completed his military service.

    It does not matter whether his actual birthday has occurred by the date on which Turkish citizenship is acquired.

    Example: A Man Born in 2005 Acquires Turkish Citizenship in 2026

    2005 + 22 = 2027.

    A man born in 2005 who acquires Turkish citizenship during 2026 therefore does not yet fall within the 22-year rule.

    Unless another exemption applies, he may consequently become subject to Turkish military service obligations.

    Do Turkish Citizenship by Investment Applicants Have to Perform Military Service?

    There is no separate military service regime specifically applicable to persons who acquire Turkish citizenship by investment.

    Citizenship by investment is a form of subsequent acquisition of Turkish citizenship under the exceptional citizenship provisions of Turkish nationality legislation.

    Therefore, Article 43 of Military Recruitment Law No. 7179 is also relevant to male foreign investors who acquire Turkish citizenship.

    For example:

    A man who acquires Turkish citizenship by investment at age 30: Generally deemed to have completed military service.

    At age 25: Generally deemed to have completed military service.

    At age 22: Generally deemed to have completed military service.

    At age 20: May be subject to military service unless another exemption applies.

    Whether citizenship was acquired through a qualifying real estate investment, bank deposit, investment fund or another qualifying investment route does not alter this basic military service rule.

    Official information concerning the acquisition of Turkish citizenship is available from the Turkish Directorate General of Population and Citizenship Affairs:

    Do I Need to Have Served in My Previous Country’s Military?

    Not necessarily.

    This is a frequent source of confusion.

    Article 43 provides for different circumstances under which a person may be deemed to have completed military service.

    A person who completed military service in his country of origin before becoming a Turkish citizen may rely on that service, subject to the documentary requirements.

    Separately, however, a person who has never performed military service in any country may still be deemed to have completed his Turkish military service if he was 22 or older in the year he acquired Turkish citizenship.

    The Turkish Ministry of National Defence provides an illustrative example in its official FAQ.

    A person born in 1997 who acquired Turkish citizenship on 26 June 2019 and had not performed military service in his former country was nevertheless exempt because he was considered 22 years old in the year in which he became a Turkish citizen.

    Official MSB FAQ:
    https://www.msb.gov.tr/Askeralma/SSS/2a08f056-2597-4652-9ae6-2d467ff0f75f

    What Happens If Turkish Citizenship Is Acquired Before the Age of 22?

    The position is different for men who are 21 or younger in the year they acquire Turkish citizenship.

    If they cannot establish that they had already performed, or were deemed to have performed, military service in their country of origin, they may become subject to the Turkish military service system.

    According to the Ministry of National Defence, their military service may, upon request, be deferred for two years from the date on which Turkish citizenship was acquired.

    Official source:
    https://www.msb.gov.tr/Askeralma/icerik/vatandaslik-islemleri

    This two-year period should not be confused with a permanent exemption.

    Once the deferment period expires, the person’s military status and recruitment procedures must be dealt with under the applicable legislation.

    When Does the Two-Year Military Service Deferment Begin?

    For persons who acquire Turkish citizenship subsequently and remain subject to military service, the special two-year deferment period runs from the date Turkish citizenship was acquired.

    For example, if an eligible person acquires Turkish citizenship on 15 June 2026, his military service may, upon request and provided that the legal requirements are satisfied, be deferred for two years from that date.

    At the end of the deferment period, the relevant military registration and examination procedures may become applicable.

    Does Military Service Completed Abroad Count in Türkiye?

    The timing of the foreign military service is important.

    Military Service Completed Before Acquiring Turkish Citizenship

    Under Article 43 of Law No. 7179, a person may be deemed to have completed his military service in Türkiye if, before acquiring Turkish citizenship, he performed military service in his country of origin or was legally deemed to have performed it and can provide the required documentation.

    The Ministry of National Defence also specifies documentary requirements for foreign military service records.

    Foreign-language documents may need to be translated into Turkish by a sworn translator and notarised.

    Official source:
    https://www.msb.gov.tr/Askeralma/icerik/vatandaslik-islemleri

    Military Service Completed Abroad After Acquiring Turkish Citizenship

    A different analysis applies if military service in another country is performed after Turkish citizenship has already been acquired.

    Being a dual citizen and performing military service in the other country does not necessarily mean that the Turkish military service obligation is automatically discharged.

    Applicable international agreements between Türkiye and the other state may also need to be examined.

    Article 45 of Law No. 7179 contains provisions relevant to the recognition of military service performed in another country.

    Therefore, the assumption that “I served in another country, so I am automatically exempt in Türkiye” should not be made without examining the individual’s circumstances.

    What About Dual Citizens?

    Dual citizenship does not, by itself, provide an exemption from Turkish military service.

    The following matters may need to be considered:

    • when Turkish citizenship was acquired;
    • the person’s year of birth;
    • whether foreign military service was completed before or after Turkish citizenship was acquired;
    • the person’s country of residence;
    • whether an applicable international agreement exists; and
    • whether the individual qualifies for another deferment or military service procedure.

    Turkish citizens residing abroad may also be eligible for specific deferment arrangements or foreign-currency military service (dövizle askerlik) if the statutory requirements are satisfied.

    Can Someone Who Is Deemed to Have Completed Military Service Volunteer to Serve Later?

    As a general rule, no.

    The Ministry of National Defence states that persons who are deemed to have completed military service because they were 22 or older in the year in which they acquired Turkish citizenship are not subsequently enlisted merely because they request to serve.

    This status is therefore not the same as paid military service or a temporary deferment. It is a statutory status under which the person is deemed to have completed military service.

    Are Women Who Acquire Turkish Citizenship Subject to Compulsory Military Service?

    No.

    Law No. 7179 regulates compulsory military service for male Turkish citizens.

    Accordingly, a woman who subsequently acquires Turkish citizenship does not become subject to compulsory military service merely as a consequence of acquiring Turkish citizenship.

    Does the Same 22-Year Rule Apply to Citizenship Acquired Through Descent?

    Not necessarily.

    This is an important exception.

    Article 43 of Military Recruitment Law No. 7179 specifically excludes certain persons who subsequently acquire Turkish citizenship on the basis of descent (soybağı) from the special rules contained in that provision.

    Therefore, acquiring citizenship through investment, marriage or a decision of the competent authority should not automatically be treated in the same way as a citizenship case based on descent.

    The legal basis on which Turkish citizenship was acquired should always be examined.

    What If a Former Turkish Citizen Reacquires Turkish Citizenship?

    This is another situation requiring separate analysis.

    A person who was previously a Turkish citizen, lost Turkish citizenship and subsequently reacquires it should not automatically be treated in the same manner as a foreign national acquiring Turkish citizenship for the first time.

    The person’s previous Turkish military service status may remain relevant.

    Consequently, a former Turkish citizen who reacquires Turkish citizenship at the age of 30 cannot safely assume that he is exempt merely because he is now older than 22.

    The previous citizenship and military service records should be examined.

    What About the Children of a Person Who Acquires Turkish Citizenship?

    The child’s date of birth and the legal basis on which the child acquired Turkish citizenship are important.

    There may be a legal distinction between children who already existed when their foreign parent acquired Turkish citizenship and children born after the parent became a Turkish citizen.

    Male children born after a parent has acquired Turkish citizenship may generally be treated, for military service purposes, in the same manner as Turkish citizens by birth, depending on the circumstances.

    For family citizenship applications, the military status of male children should therefore be examined separately rather than assuming that the principal applicant’s exemption automatically extends to them.

    How Can I Check My Military Service Status After Becoming a Turkish Citizen?

    Once Turkish citizenship has been registered and a Turkish ID number has been issued, military service information can generally be checked through the Ministry of National Defence services available on e-Devlet (e-Government Gateway).

    Official e-Devlet service:
    https://www.turkiye.gov.tr/mill-savunma-askerligim

    The Ministry of National Defence also allows various military recruitment procedures and document requests to be carried out electronically.

    However, administrative or registration discrepancies can occur.

    For example, a person may appear as subject to military service even though he should be deemed to have completed it under Article 43, or foreign military service documentation may not yet have been reflected in the relevant records.

    In such cases, an application may need to be submitted to the competent military recruitment office for correction of the record.

    Practical 2026 Age Table

    For persons acquiring Turkish citizenship during 2026:

    Born in 2004 or earlier: Generally within the 22-year rule and deemed to have completed military service, subject to the statutory exceptions.

    Born in 2005: Considered below the 22-year threshold for this purpose in 2026. Military service obligations may arise unless another exemption applies.

    Born in 2006: Below the 22-year threshold. Military service obligations may arise.

    The critical point is that the year of birth, rather than the exact birthday, is used for this calculation.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Do I have to perform military service after becoming a Turkish citizen?

    If you are a man who subsequently acquires Turkish citizenship and you are 22 or older in the year citizenship is acquired, you will generally be deemed to have completed military service, subject to the exceptions provided by law.

    I became a Turkish citizen at 30. Do I have to serve in the Turkish military?

    If you acquired Turkish citizenship for the first time at age 30 and your case does not fall within one of the special categories, such as certain descent-based cases, you will generally be deemed to have completed military service under Article 43.

    I am 22, but my birthday has not happened yet. Am I exempt?

    The calculation is based on the year of birth rather than whether your birthday has occurred. The Ministry’s guidance calculates the relevant year by adding 22 to the year of birth.

    I acquired Turkish citizenship by investment. Do I have to perform military service?

    There is no separate military service rule for citizenship by investment. The general rules applicable to persons who subsequently acquire Turkish citizenship apply.

    Can I obtain Turkish citizenship without completing military service first?

    Yes. Performing Turkish military service is not a general prerequisite for acquiring Turkish citizenship. The person’s military status is determined separately following the acquisition of citizenship.

    I completed military service in my home country. Do I have to serve again in Türkiye?

    If you completed military service in your country of origin before acquiring Turkish citizenship, Article 43 may allow you to be deemed to have completed your military service in Türkiye, provided the relevant requirements and documentary conditions are satisfied.

    Is there a two-year deferment after acquiring Turkish citizenship?

    Eligible persons who remain subject to military service may request a two-year deferment calculated from the date Turkish citizenship was acquired.

    I acquired citizenship after the age of 22, but e-Devlet still shows a military service obligation. What should I do?

    The citizenship acquisition date, year of birth, legal basis for acquiring citizenship and existing military records should be reviewed. If the registration does not correspond with the person’s legal status, an application for correction may be required.

    Conclusion

    For foreign nationals who subsequently acquire Turkish citizenship, 22 is the key age for determining military service status.

    However, the calculation is not based simply on the person’s exact age on the date citizenship is granted.

    Under the Ministry of National Defence’s application of Article 43, the year of birth is decisive.

    For example, a man born in 2004 who subsequently acquires Turkish citizenship at any time in 2026 will generally fall within the 22-year rule and be deemed to have completed his military service.

    For those who acquire citizenship at 21 or younger, military service obligations may arise. A two-year deferment, previous military service abroad, dual citizenship, education and other circumstances may affect the final position.

    Cases involving citizenship through descent, reacquisition of Turkish citizenship, foreign military service or family citizenship applications require particular attention and should not be assessed solely on the person’s current age.

    Legal Assistance from TD Law Firm & Consultancy

    Military service issues following the acquisition of Turkish citizenship can require an individual legal assessment. The date and legal basis of citizenship acquisition, year of birth, previous nationality, military service completed abroad, dual citizenship and existing records held by the Turkish authorities may all affect the outcome.

    TD Law Firm & Consultancy provides legal services concerning Turkish citizenship and foreigners’ law, including the determination of military service status following naturalisation, military service exemptions and deferments, correction of inaccurate military records, applications before the competent military recruitment authorities and the assessment of military service previously completed abroad.

    In particular, foreign nationals who acquire Turkish citizenship by investment are advised to verify their military service status after completion of the citizenship process.

    Where e-Devlet or military recruitment records do not correspond with the person’s legal status, the matter can be reviewed and the appropriate administrative applications can be made.

    Contact TD Law Firm & Consultancy

    For legal assistance regarding Turkish citizenship, military service exemption, military service deferment, citizenship by investment or military registration issues, you may contact:

    TD Law Firm & Consultancy
    Attorney Murat Can Dolğun – Istanbul Bar Association, Registration No. 75860

    Address: Istanbul World Trade Center (IDTM), A2 Block, No. 206, Bakırköy, Istanbul, Türkiye
    Telephone: +90 212 299 44 22
    Mobile / WhatsApp: +90 507 475 44 22
    Email: av.muratcandolgun@gmail.com
    Website: dolgun.av.tr

    When contacting our office, providing your date of birth, date of acquisition of Turkish citizenship, previous nationality and information concerning any military service completed abroad will assist with the preliminary assessment of your case.

    Each case must be assessed according to its individual circumstances. No exemption, deferment or particular administrative outcome can be guaranteed without reviewing the person’s citizenship and military service records.

    Summary

    Men who subsequently acquire Turkish citizenship and are 22 or older in the year citizenship is acquired are generally deemed to have completed military service under Article 43 of Military Recruitment Law No. 7179. The calculation is based on the year of birth rather than the exact birthday. Men who are 21 or younger may become subject to military service, although a two-year deferment may be available upon request. The same general framework applies to citizenship by investment, while citizenship through descent, reacquisition of Turkish citizenship and military service completed abroad require separate consideration.